Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 5A0001 OSH Act General Duty Paragraph
This violation item has been deleted.
Inspection Nr: 110424835
Citation: 01002
Citation Type: Serious
Abatement Status: X
Initial Penalty: $1,000.00
Current Penalty:
Issuance Date: 02/28/1991
Nr Instances: 3
Nr Exposed: 13
Abatement Date: 06/06/1991
Gravity: 10
Report ID: 0625700
Contest Date: 03/27/1991
Final Order: 03/15/1993
Related Event Code (REC):
Emphasis:
| Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penalty | D: Govt Dismissed | 03/15/1993 | 06/06/1991 | Serious | ||
| Penalty | Z: Issued | 02/28/1991 | $1,000.00 | 06/06/1991 | Serious |
Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 002 Hazard: CHEMICAL
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of inhalation of toxic chemicals, such as Hydrogen Sulfide: a) The employer did not provide an adequate toxic vapor detection system in the Hydrocracker Unit (HCLA) in that only one hydrogen sulfide sensor was provided in the Operating Unit. NOTE: Among other methods, a feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this problem is: Installation of properly designed fixed vapor detection system with sensors located where the potential for a toxic material leak exists from a specific piece of equipment, such as, a compressor or pump to alert the responsible operating personnel when a hazardous condition exists.
Translate