Powered by GoogleTranslate

Violation Detail

Standard Cited: 5A0001 OSH Act General Duty Paragraph

Inspection Nr: 110141009

Citation: 01002

Citation Type: Serious

Abatement Status: X

Initial Penalty: $1,500.00

Current Penalty: $1,275.00

Issuance Date: 03/11/1997

Nr Instances: 1

Nr Exposed: 11

Abatement Date: 10/01/1997

Gravity: 01

Report ID: 0419700

Contest Date:

Final Order:

Related Event Code (REC): A

Emphasis:


Penalty and Failure to Abate Event History
Type Latest Event Event Date Penalty Abatement Due Date Citation Type Failure to Abate Inspection
Penalty I: Informal Settlement 04/02/1997 $1,275.00 10/01/1997 Serious  
Penalty Z: Issued 03/11/1997 $1,500.00 04/14/1997 Serious  

Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 002 Hazard: ELECTRIC

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of structural fires: a.On or about October 9, 1996, the electrical systems on the Norton Creek Farm were not maintained in a safe and proper operational condition: 1.Temporary wiring was used in place of permanent wiring: A.In House Number Three, a flat orange extension cord was used to provide power to the fill line motor and switches. B.Throughout the farm, orange extension cords were used in place of permanent wiring to provide power to the fill line switches. 2.Electrical cords were not protected from damage: A.Throughout the farm, orange extension cords used to provide power to the feed line auger motors, were not protected from damage caused by the chickens pecking at the cords, damaging the exterior casing of the power lines. B.Throughout the farm, the nonmetallic-sheathed cables were not protected from damage. The nonmetallic-sheathed cables did not follow the surfaces closely and were not enclosed in conduit. 3.In House Number Three, temporary wiring was stapled to the rafters of the structure. The flat orange extension cord supplying power to the fill line had been stapled to the structure. 4.Power cords were improperly spliced together. In House Number Four, the orange extension cord wired into the 48-inch wall fan had a spliced area where the tape was coming off, exposing the inner electrical wires. 5.Throughout the farm, the nonmetallic-sheathed cable, Romex style power lines, were not supported every 4 feet. The cables were connected to the support poles in the houses. The support poles were approximately 12 feet apart. The distance between poles 2 and 4 was approximately 24 feet because the third pole on each side of the house had been removed to allow access inside the house to cleaning equipment. 6.Throughout the farm, there were junction boxes and receptacles found without face plates, opened, exposing the interior wires, such as but notlimited to the fill line receptacles in House Number Three, and south feed line in House Number Four. Among other methods, one feasible means of abatement would be to provide electrical installations which are incompliance with the National Electrical code.rical

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close