Translate
Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 5A0001 OSH Act General Duty Paragraph
Inspection Nr: 100590306
Citation: 01002
Citation Type: Serious
Abatement Status: X
Initial Penalty: $2,000.00
Current Penalty: $1,635.00
Issuance Date: 12/20/1991
Nr Instances: 2
Nr Exposed: 6
Abatement Date: 01/24/1992
Gravity: 02
Report ID: 0316400
Contest Date: 01/14/1992
Final Order: 02/18/1993
Related Event Code (REC):
Emphasis:
| Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penalty | F: Formal Settlement | 02/18/1993 | $1,635.00 | 01/24/1992 | Serious | |
| Penalty | Z: Issued | 12/20/1991 | $2,000.00 | 01/24/1992 | Serious |
Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 002 Hazard: CRUSHING
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crushing: a. Maintenance Area of the Cargo Sucker - Crushing injuries due to the John Deere 350-C Dozer (Co. No. 158) did not have an operable back-up alarm, on or about August 7, 1991. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard would be to install an operable back-up alarm. b. Crushing injuries due to there not being a back-up alarm on on the Massey Ferguson 230 (#Q25300) at Line #1, Potroom which was used to move the fluoride bucket. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to install back-up alarms on equipment that has an obstructed view to the rear.