Powered by GoogleTranslate

Violation Detail

Standard Cited: 5A0001 OSH Act General Duty Paragraph

Inspection Nr: 110365285

Citation: 01001A

Citation Type: Serious

Abatement Status: X

Initial Penalty: $1,925.00

Current Penalty: $1,060.00

Issuance Date: 08/27/1992

Nr Instances: 1

Nr Exposed: 2

Abatement Date: 10/26/1992

Gravity: 05

Report ID: 0636900

Contest Date:

Final Order:

Related Event Code (REC):

Emphasis:


Penalty and Failure to Abate Event History
Type Latest Event Event Date Penalty Abatement Due Date Citation Type Failure to Abate Inspection
Penalty I: Informal Settlement 09/22/1992 $1,060.00 10/26/1992 Serious  
Penalty Z: Issued 08/27/1992 $1,925.00 09/29/1992 Serious  

Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 001A Hazard: CHEMICAL

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for illness. The employer is not limited to abatement methods suggested by OSHA, i.e., methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. Other methods of abatement may be equally or more appropriate. Ultimate responsibility for determining the most appropriate abate- ment method rests with the employer, given its superior knowledge of the specific conditions on its worksite. The violation(s) described in this citation are alleged to have occurred on or about the day(s) the inspection was made unless other- wise indicated within the description given below each violation. a. Painters applying clearcoat in the spray bake booths at this facility were exposed to excessive levels of 1, 6- Hexamethylene diisocyanate homopolymer. Eight short term exposure samples taken indicated exposure levels ranging from 1.47 mg/m3 to 9.80 mg/m3 during separate intervals of 15 minutes or less. Among other methods, some feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard are: 1. Upgrade engineering controls to provide a more even distribution of airflow throughout the booth. 2. Product substitutes which do not contain isocyanates. Abatement Schedule Step 1 - Effective respiratory protection shall be provided to and used by exposed employees as an interium protective measure until feasible engineering and/or administrative controls can be implemented or whenever such controls fail to reduce employee exposure to within permissible exposure limits. Step 2 - A written detailed plan of abatement shall be submitted to the Area Director outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measures to control employee exposures to hazardous substances as referenced in this cita- tion. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the dates required by this citation: (1) Evaluation of engineering/administrative control options; (2) Selection of optimum control method and completion of design; (3) Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures; (4) Testing and acceptance or modification/redesign of controls; Step 3 - Completed implementation of feasible engineering and/or 0 administrative controls.

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close