Powered by GoogleTranslate

Violation Detail

Standard Cited: 5A0001 OSH Act General Duty Paragraph

Inspection Nr: 910396.015

Citation: 01001

Citation Type: Serious

Abatement Status: Abatement Completed

Initial Penalty: $5,000.00

Current Penalty: $2,500.00

Issuance Date: 12/02/2013

Nr Instances: 1

Nr Exposed: 20

Abatement Date: 10/30/2015

Gravity: 5

Report ID: 0524700

Contest Date:

Final Order: 12/18/2013

Related Event Code (REC):

Emphasis:

Substance: E101


Penalty and Failure to Abate Event History
Type Latest Event Event Date Penalty Abatement Due Date Citation Type Failure to Abate Inspection
Penalty P: Petition to Mod Abatement $2,500.00 06/30/2015 Serious  
Penalty P: Petition to Mod Abatement $2,500.00 10/30/2015 Serious  
Penalty P: Petition to Mod Abatement $2,500.00 12/30/2014 Serious  
Penalty I: Informal Settlement 12/18/2013 $2,500.00 09/24/2014 Serious  
Penalty Z: Issued 12/02/2013 $5,000.00 12/24/2013 Serious  

Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 001 Hazard:

OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to combustible straw dust deflagration and other fire hazards while working at or near a dust collector and associated upstream equipment which were not adequately designed to prevent or minimize employee exposure in the event of a deflagration or other fire event: (a) American Excelsior, Norwalk, Ohio: On or about June 6, 2013, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from straw dust explosion and deflagration hazards. (1) Employees were exposed to hazards from a dust collector located outdoors and immediately adjacent to the truck loading operation. Explosion relief vents on the dust collector were directed directly towards employees loading trucks with straw and straw dust. (2) The dust collection system did not have deflagration isolation for upstream processes. The dust collection system lacked controls to prevent fire and pressure wave from moving upstream into the production building exposing employees to fire and explosion hazards. Among other methods, a feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard would be to follow the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) NFPA 654 Standard for the Prevention of Fire and Dust Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing, and Handling of Combustible Particulate Solids, 2013 edition, Sections 7.1.4.1, 7.1.6, and 7.1.7, NFPA 61 Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Dust Explosions in Agricultural and Food Processing Facilities, 2013 edition, Sections 6.1, A6.1, and 6.3, NFPA 68 Standard on Explosion Protection by Deflagration Venting, 2007 edition, Sections 4.2.1.3, 5.2.3.3, 6.6.1, and 7.4.4. Specifically, (1) Re-direct the explosion vents so that they do not discharge into employee occupied areas per guidance in NFPA 68, install venting with listed dust retention and flame-arresting devices per NFPA 68, or install chemical deflagration suppression in accordance with NFPA 69; AND (2) install an active or passive deflagration propagation isolation device between the dust collector and the outer wall of the building to protect the upstream production equipment.

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close