Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 5A0001 OSH Act General Duty Paragraph
Inspection Nr: 314703695
Citation: 01001
Citation Type: Serious
Abatement Status: X
Initial Penalty: $4,500.00
Current Penalty: $3,375.00
Issuance Date: 04/08/2011
Nr Instances: 1
Nr Exposed: 1
Abatement Date: 04/20/2011
Gravity: 05
Report ID: 0627510
Contest Date:
Final Order:
Related Event Code (REC):
Emphasis:
| Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penalty | I: Informal Settlement | 04/29/2011 | $3,375.00 | 04/20/2011 | Serious | |
| Penalty | Z: Issued | 04/08/2011 | $4,500.00 | 04/20/2011 | Serious |
Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 001 Hazard: UNCLASS
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the condition(s) listed below: Heart Land Drilling, Rig 2, Post Estate Well #85, Garza County, TX. For the period of time up to and including 10/20/10, a mud hose was being used in a condition such that the inner coils were visible. API Recommended Practice 54, Third Edition, August 1999, Reaffirmed, March 2007, titled Recommended Practice for Occupational Safety for Oil and Gas Well Drilling and Servicing Operations, stated in section 9.13.4 "In normal operations, pumps, piping, hoses, valves, and other fittings shall not be operated at pressures greater than their rated working pressure and shall be maintained in good operating condition." Feasible and acceptable abatement methods would include: Regular inspection and replacement of worn hoses.ement
Translate