Powered by GoogleTranslate

Violation Detail

Standard Cited: 5A0001 OSH Act General Duty Paragraph

Inspection Nr: 314659285

Citation: 01001

Citation Type: Serious

Abatement Status: X

Initial Penalty: $375.00

Current Penalty: $262.00

Issuance Date: 11/15/2010

Nr Instances: 2

Nr Exposed: 2

Abatement Date: 02/15/2011

Gravity: 05

Report ID: 0830500

Contest Date:

Final Order:

Related Event Code (REC):

Emphasis:


Penalty and Failure to Abate Event History
Type Latest Event Event Date Penalty Abatement Due Date Citation Type Failure to Abate Inspection
Penalty P: Petition to Mod Abatement 02/04/2011 $262.00 02/15/2011 Serious  
Penalty I: Informal Settlement 12/09/2010 $262.00 01/15/2011 Serious  
Penalty Z: Issued 11/15/2010 $375.00 11/25/2010 Serious  

Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 001 Hazard: BURNS

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical hazards, including severe burns, to employees in that employees were exposed to dust explosion, deflagration, or other fire hazards: (a)Snyder and Counts Feed, Seed and Supply Co., Inc. at 265 Ranney St., Craig, CO 81625: On or about September 16, 2010, and at times prior thereto, a bagger in the production area was not equipped with explosion protection systems. This condition exposed the employees to dust explosion, deflagration, or other fire hazards. (b)Snyder and Counts Feed, Seed and Supply Co., Inc. at 265 Ranney St., Craig, CO 81625: On or about September 16, 2010, and at times prior thereto, the cyclones were not equipped with explosion protection systems. This condition exposed the employees to dust explosion, deflagration, or other fire hazards. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to perform the following: Among other feasible abatement methods to correct this hazard is to vent the baggers to a safe, outside location away from platforms, means of egress, or other potentially occupied areas. See NFPA 68, Standard on Explosion Protection by Deflagration Venting, for information on determining the appropriate explosion venting area and arrangement. Other feasible means of abatement include: suppression, containment, or inerting systems as described in NFPA 69, Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems. Among other feasible abatement methods to correct this hazard is to install spark detectors and abort gates, a dust collector suppression system, a spark detection and extinguishing system, and/or other automatic spark detection and fire suppression system in the ductworks feeding into the cyclones. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 61, Sections 6.1 and 6.2 apply in this instance. NFPA 69 is a supporting document of how to apply protection systems. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement-Certification Letter").-Certification

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close