Powered by GoogleTranslate

Violation Detail

Standard Cited: 5A0001 OSH Act General Duty Paragraph

Inspection Nr: 314234238

Citation: 01001

Citation Type: Serious

Abatement Status: W

Initial Penalty: $4,200.00

Current Penalty: $333.00

Issuance Date: 08/17/2011

Nr Instances: 1

Nr Exposed: 2

Abatement Date: 08/30/2011

Gravity: 10

Report ID: 0317000

Contest Date: 10/26/2011

Final Order: 02/24/2012

Related Event Code (REC):

Emphasis:


Failure to Abate
Activity Nr Issuance Penalty Contest Final Order
315820472 01/14/2013 $1,320.00

Penalty and Failure to Abate Event History
Type Latest Event Event Date Penalty Abatement Due Date Citation Type Failure to Abate Inspection
Penalty F: Formal Settlement 02/24/2012 $333.00 08/30/2011 Serious  
Penalty Z: Issued 08/17/2011 $4,200.00 08/30/2011 Serious  

Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 001 Hazard: UNAPEQUIP

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to laceration hazards: a) Bravo Marble and Granite: The employer did not ensure that the saw blade was replaced as necessary to prevent continuing breakage exposing employees to laceration hazards. The individual acting as a supervisor on site operated an Express 3200 water fed automated bridge saw to cut granite stone slabs. Two teeth and a portion of a third tooth on the saw blade were missing and the supervisor continued to use the blade to cut the granite stone slabs. Another employee's hands were placed in immediate proximity of the saw blade while it was operating. On or about May 2, 2011. Among other methods, feasible means of abatement were to: a) Comply with the requirements of Marble Technical Institute of America Module, Safety in the Stone Business including the requirements of Section VII (Equipment Operations Procedures), Part A (Saws), "Never use a damaged blade. If the blade is cracked, the core excessively worn, warped or out of round, segments are missing or the arbor hole is worn or damaged, the blade is unsafe to use". b) Institute an inspection process which requires employees to inspect the automated bridge saw blade prior to use at the beginning of each work shift and provide employees with procedures for replacement of the blade as necessary. NOTE: DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT OF THIS CONDITION IS REQUIRED.

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close