Powered by GoogleTranslate

Violation Detail

Standard Cited: 30223 A General Duty Clause

This violation item has been deleted.

Inspection Nr: 311480388

Citation: 01001

Citation Type: Serious

Abatement Status: W

Initial Penalty: $1,050.00

Current Penalty: $1,050.00

Issuance Date: 09/27/2011

Nr Instances: 21

Nr Exposed: 21

Abatement Date: 10/17/2011

Gravity: 05

Report ID: 0155010

Contest Date:

Final Order:

Related Event Code (REC):

Emphasis:

Substance: 9020

Substance: 1591


Penalty and Failure to Abate Event History
Type Latest Event Event Date Penalty Abatement Due Date Citation Type Failure to Abate Inspection
Penalty D: Govt Dismissed 10/01/2011 $1,050.00 10/17/2011 Serious  
Penalty Z: Issued 09/27/2011 $1,050.00 10/17/2011 Serious  

Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 001 Hazard: CHEMICAL

21 VSA Title 23, Chapter 3, Sub-chapter5, Section 223 (a)(1) Of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that they were exposed to demolition dust containing hazardous chemicals. Feasible and resonable means of abatement is to: 1) complete a hazard assessment of the work place to determine what hazards are present. 2) make sure contractor was taking the steps necessary to safeguard the health and safety of employees. 3) no employees allowed in area where demolition operations are being performed and could adversely effect employees health,(ANZI Standard Ref.A10-6).4) suppress and minimize dust with wetting agents or sweeping compounds, long established in the demolition industry. Utilize efficient and effective dust collecting methods. Locate pollutant sources as far away as possible from supply ducts and areas occupied by workers. Supply and exhaust systems may have to be shut down or isolated during activity. Pressure differentials utilized to prevent contaminated air from entering clean areas. LOCATION: Thayer Building, North Street, Burlington VIOLATION: On April 1, 2011, CSHO noted the employer did not take necessary precautions to prevent the exposure of employees to hazardous dust from the demolition of a building adjacent to employees work area. The work area was in a construction zone.

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close