Powered by GoogleTranslate

Violation Detail

Standard Cited: 6A0001 General Duty Clause

Inspection Nr: 305826133

Citation: 01001

Citation Type: Serious

Abatement Status: X

Initial Penalty: $2,000.00

Current Penalty:

Issuance Date: 05/25/2004

Nr Instances: 1

Nr Exposed: 16

Abatement Date: 07/13/2004

Gravity: 02

Report ID: 0257210

Contest Date: 06/21/2004

Final Order: 04/21/2005

Related Event Code (REC): C

Emphasis:


Penalty and Failure to Abate Event History
Type Latest Event Event Date Penalty Abatement Due Date Citation Type Failure to Abate Inspection
Penalty J: ALJ Decision 04/21/2005 07/13/2004 Serious  
Penalty Z: Issued 05/25/2004 $2,000.00 07/13/2004 Serious  

Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 001 Hazard: CHEMICAL

Section 6(a) of the Puerto Rico Occupational Safety and Health Act: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: Seccion 6(a) de la Ley de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo de Puerto Rico: El patrono no proveyo empleo y un sitio de empleo libre de riesgos reconocidos que esten causando o que puedan causar muerte o dano fisico a los empleados, por cuanto empleados estaban expuestos a: At "Departamento de Salud", employees of the Environmental Health Local Office, Environmental Health Regional Office and Community Health Program Office, were exposed to inadequate handling of emergencies such as fires, chemical spills, natural disasters, etc. On March 12, 2004 a sphygmomanometer was broken accidentally and the mercury inside it was spilled on the floor of a room used by employees to store equipment, educative materials and as a lunchroom. The room was closed and the mercury remains in the floor for about six days, before the employees were removed from the area. On March 24, 2004 the spill was apparently cleaned. On April 1, 2004 some wipes were taken that demonstrated the presence of mercury in different areas of the Environmental Health Local Office and the room of the spill. On April 6, 2004 others wipes were taken and an 8 hour Time Weighted Average air sampling for the areas. The wipes demonstrated the presence of 1,400 ug mercury and the air sampling was 0.0720 mg/m3, demonstrated the improper cleaning of the area. The Department did not have an emergency action plan for situations like this one or other emergencies or fires. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to develop and implement an emergency action plan, train employees in emergency action procedures and evacuation and review periodically the plan. In addition, the employer must assure that the areas were clean of mercury presence before the employees return to work in the offices, because mercury can absorb by the skin and cause skin irritation due to contact. En el Departamento de Salud, empleados de la Oficina Local de Salud Ambiental, Oficina Regional de Salud Ambiental y Oficina Programa Salud Comunitaria fueron expuestos a manejo inadecuado de emergencias tales como fuego, derrames de productos quimicos, desastres naturales, etc. El dia 12 de marzo de 2004, un esfigmomanometro fue roto accidentalmente y el mercurio dentro se derramo en el piso de un cuarto utilizado por los empleados para almacenar equipo, material educativo y como comedor. El cuarto fue cerrado y el mercurio permanecio en el piso cerca de 6 dias, antes de que los empleados fueran removidos del area. El dia 24 de marzo de 2004 el derrame aparentemente fue limpiado. El dia 1 de abril de 2004 algunos "wipes" fueron tomados que demostraron la presencia de mercurio en diferentes areas de la Oficina Local de Salud Ambiental y en el cuarto del derrame. El dia 6 de abril de 2004, otros "wipes" fueron y un muestreo de aire para ocho horas para las areas. Los "wipes" demostraron presencia de 1,400 ug de mercurio y el muestreo de aire detecto presencia de 0.720 mg/m3 demostro la limpieza inapropiada del area. El Departamento no tenia un plan de accion de emergencias para situaciones como esta u otras emergencias o fuego. Entre otros metodos, un metodo de correccion factible y aceptable para corregir este riesgo es desarrollar e implantar un plan de accion de emergencia, adiestrar a los empleados en procedimientos de accion de emergencias y desalojo y revisar periodicamente el plan. Ademas, el patrono debe asegurarseque las areas sean limpiadas de la presencia de mercurio antes de que los empleados regresen a trabajar a sus oficinas, debido a que el mercurio puede ser absorbido a traves de la piel y causa irrtiacion de la piel debido a contacto.n

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close