Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 5A0001 OSH Act General Duty Paragraph
Inspection Nr: 1227576.015
Citation: 01001
Citation Type: Serious
Abatement Status: Abatement Completed
Initial Penalty: $8,963.00
Current Penalty: $5,986.00
Issuance Date: 10/13/2017
Nr Instances: 7
Nr Exposed: 7
Abatement Date: 11/17/2017
Gravity: 5
Report ID: 0215800
Contest Date: 10/30/2017
Final Order: 03/08/2018
Related Event Code (REC):
Emphasis:
Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Penalty | F: Formal Settlement | 03/08/2018 | $5,986.00 | 11/17/2017 | Serious | |
Penalty | C: Contested | 11/02/2017 | $8,963.00 | 11/17/2017 | Serious | |
Penalty | Z: Issued | 10/13/2017 | $8,963.00 | 11/17/2017 | Serious |
Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 001 Hazard:
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck by hazards: a) The following below-the-hook lifting devices were not inspected and/or had no rated load capacity markings: 1. Steel Storage off Machine Shop, on or about 5/9/17: A two ton spreader beam attached to a two ton CM Lodestar overhead hoist, used to lift steel bars, was not inspected. 2. Chip Room off Machine Shop, on or about 5/9/17: A Cecor spreader beam attached to a Dayton 1/2 ton chain hoist, used to dump chip containers, had no rated load capacity markings on it and had not been inspected. 3. Ammo, Cupping Area, on or about 5/9/17: A two ton C-hook below-the-hook lifting device attached to a Harrington two ton crane for lifting coils was not inspected. Among other methods, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct these hazards are to: 1. Inspect the lifting devices in accordance with ASME B30.20-2010, Section 20-1.3. 2. Mark the rated load capacity on the device in accordance with ASME B30.20-2010, Section 20-1.2.1. b) The following overhead hoists did not have the rated load capacity markings on the hoist: 1. Bluing Room, on or about 5/9/17: A David Brown overhead hoist, used to lift baskets of parts at the dip tanks, had no rated load capacity markings on it. 2. BB Grinder Area, on or about 5/9/17: A CM Lodestar 1/2 ton hoist, used to lift containers of BB's, was not clearly marked as to its rated load capacity. Among other methods, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct these hazards are to: 1. Mark the rated load capacity on the hoist in accordance with ASME B30.16-2007, Section 16-1.1. c) The following bridge crane structure had no rated load capacity markings and the hoist was underrated for what the monorail was rated for: 1. Ammo Pellet Header Dept., on or about 5/9/17: CM Lodestar overhead hoist attached to a bridge rail system, used to pick up bins of scrap metal, did not have the rated load capacity markings on it. 2. BB Grinder Area, on or about 5/9/17: A CM Lodestar 1/2 ton hoist, used to lift containers of BB's, was mounted to a monorail rated for one ton. Among other methods, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct these hazards are to: 1. Re-rate the monorail systems to match the rating of the hoist in accordance with ASME B30.11-2010, Section 11-1.1. 2. Mark the rated load capacity markings on the bridge crane in accordance with ASME B30.11-2010, Section 11-1.1. Abatement documentation must be submitted for these items.