Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 19100212 A01 General requirements for all machines.
Inspection Nr: 1016219.015
Citation: 01001
Citation Type: Serious
Abatement Status: Abatement Completed
Initial Penalty: $38,500.00
Current Penalty: $7,000.00
Issuance Date: 04/14/2015
Nr Instances: 16
Nr Exposed: 50
Abatement Date: 12/16/2015
Gravity: 10
Report ID: 0524700
Contest Date: 04/29/2015
Final Order: 12/28/2015
Related Event Code (REC): C
Emphasis:
Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Penalty | F: Formal Settlement | 12/28/2015 | $7,000.00 | 12/16/2015 | Serious | |
Penalty | C: Contested | 05/01/2015 | $38,500.00 | 04/30/2015 | Repeat | |
Penalty | Z: Issued | 04/14/2015 | $38,500.00 | 04/30/2015 | Repeat |
Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 001 Hazard:
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) On or about January 13, 2015, the automated/robot ladle associated with Production Cell #1 was not equipped with guarding to protect employees from pinch points and molten aluminum metal hazards. Employees that access the hazard area were exposed to the pinch points of the moving ladle, molten aluminum metal, and a pinch point created between a scrap bin located below the ladle and devices as they rotate to the pouring station. b) On or about January 13, 2015, the employer did not assure that a pinch point created when Production Cell #1 devices approach the catcher station, was adequately guarded. Employees pulling parts and/or operating the production cell were exposed to being caught between devices and the catcher table. c) On or about January 13, 2015, the employer did not assure that pinch points, created when Production Cell #1 devices tilt to the horizontal position, were guarded. Employees accessing the production cell?s turn table were exposed to crush/caught-by hazards as the device tilted. d) On or about January 13, 2015, the employer did not assure that pinch points, created when molds on production Cell #1 automatically close, were guarded. Employees accessing the hazard area to remove parts or flashing or used compressed air in the mold were exposed to crushing and amputation injuries. e) On or about January 13, 2015, the automated/robot ladles associated with Production Cell #2 were not equipped with guarding to protect employees from pinch points and molten aluminum metal hazards. Employees that access the hazard area were exposed to the pinch points of the moving ladles, molten aluminum metal, and a pinch point created between a scrap bin located below the ladles and devices as they rotate to the pouring stations. f) On or about January 13, 2015, the employer did not assure that a pinch point, created when Production Cell #2 devices approach the catcher station, was adequately guarded. Employees pulling parts and/or operating the production cell were exposed to being caught between devices and the catcher table. g) On or about February 5, 2015, the employer did not assure that pinch points, created when Production Cell #2 devices tilt to the horizontal position, were guarded. Employees accessing the production cell?s turn table were exposed to crush/caught-by hazards as the device tilted. h) On or about February 5, 2015, the employer did not assure that pinch points, created when molds on production Cell #2 automatically close, were guarded. Employees accessing the hazard area to remove parts or flashing or used compressed air in the mold were exposed to crushing and amputation injuries. i) On or about February 5, 2015, the automated/robot ladle associated with Production Cell #3 was not equipped with guarding to protect employees from pinch points and molten aluminum metal hazards. Employees that access the hazard area are exposed to the pinch points of the moving ladle and molten aluminum metal. j) On or about February 5, 2015, the employer did not assure that a pinch point created when Production Cell #3 devices approach the catcher station, was adequately guarded. Employees pulling parts and/or operating the production cell were exposed to being caught between devices and the catcher table. k) On or about February 5, 2015, the employer did not assure that pinch points, created when Production Cell #3 devices tilt to the horizontal position, were guarded. Employees accessing the production cell?s turn table were exposed to crush/caught-by hazards as the device tilted. l) On or about February 5, 2015, the employer did not assure that pinch points, created when molds on production Cell #3 automatically close, were guarded. Employees accessing the hazard area to remove parts or flashing, spray the mold with insulator, or use compressed air in the mold were exposed to crushing and amputation injuries. m) On or about February 5, 2015, the automated/robot ladle associated with Production Cell #4 was not equipped with guarding to protect employees from pinch points and molten aluminum metal hazards. Employees that access the hazard area were exposed to molten aluminum metal and a pinch point created between a barrier around the crucible and devices as they rotate to the pouring station. n) On or about January 5, 2015, the employer did not assure that a pinch point created when Production Cell #4 devices approach the catcher station, was adequately guarded. Employees pulling parts and/or operating the production cell were exposed to being caught between devices and the catcher table. o) On or about January 5, 2015, the employer did not assure that pinch points, created when Production Cell #4 devices tilt to the horizontal position, were guarded. Employees accessing the production cell?s turn table were exposed to crush/caught-by hazards as the device tilted. p) On or about January 5, 2015, the employer did not assure that pinch points, created when molds on production Cell #4 automatically close, were guarded. Employees accessing the hazard area to remove parts or flashing, spray the mold with insulator, or use compressed air in the mold were exposed to crushing and amputation injuries. Reliable Castings Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.212(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 914354, citation number 2, item number 5 and was affirmed as a final order on December 24, 2014 with respect to a workplace located at 1521 W. Michigan Street in Sidney, Ohio.