- Standard Number:
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
May 3, 1990
Mr. John A. Pompei Administrator Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Division Department of Insurance and Finance 21 Labor and Industries Building Salem, Oregon 97310
Dear Mr. Pompei:
This is a interim response to your inquiry to Mr. James Lake concerning the intent of "advance first-aid" mentioned in section 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(vi) of the Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response standard.
In order to address your concerns, we are in the process of gathering information on advanced first-aid courses from the Red Cross and Department of Transportation. We expect to provide you with a full response shortly.
Thank you for your patience.
Patricia K. Clark Director Designate Directorate of Compliance Programs
February 28, 1990
MEMORANDUM FOR: PATRICIA CLARK, Director
THRU: LEO CAREY Director Office of Field Programs
FROM: JAMES W. LAKE Regional Administrator Region X
SUBJECT: Request for Interpretation, Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response
Attached is a copy of a letter we received from OR-OSHA wherein they request an interpretation of the first aid requirements for emergency response at 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(vi).
We have reviewed this request and have determined that the issues in question go beyond the scope of the discussion contained in the preamble to the final rule of March 6, 1989. As such, this matter is being referred to your office for a response. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if further information is needed.
February 14, 1990
James W Lake Regional Administrator Occupational Safety and Health Administration 909 First Ave Seattle WA 98174
Subject: Request for Rule Interpretation Hazardous Waste and Emergency Response
Dear Mr. Lake:
In developing our question and answers manual for the hazardous waste and emergency response rules, our Technical Services Section received the following question:
What is meant by the statement, "Advance first-aid support personnel, as a minimum, shall also stand by with medical equipment and transportation capability."? 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(vi)
We formulated the following response:
"Advance first-aid" means Advanced Life Support (ALS) certification level (ALS certified equals (1) EMT-3 or higher). "Medical equipment" and "transportation capability" means those specifically required as outlined by ALS. Private ambulance providers are required to have ALS certification training. Law enforcement personnel are not required to have ALS training; however, ALS must be made available. Public highway workers or municipal waste treatment workers who discover a release are not required to have ALS certification. However, incident commanders at emergency responses must require an ALS provider to stand by at the scene.
However, emergency responders have requested that we revise our response:
"Advance first-aid" means advanced first-aid as certified by the American Red Cross. The rules require these personnel to be standing by with medical equipment and transportation capability at hazardous materials incidents. This means that a Basic Life Support (BLS) ambulance is required; and, it must be staffed by a minimum of two personnel who are certified at EMT-1 or higher.
The responders argue that the revised interpretation is achievable in Oregon and that our initial interpretation is not. Does this revision meet the intent of the OSHA rules? If not, what would meet the intent of the rules? Page 9309 of the March 6, 1989, Federal Register is vague in defining what advance first-aid is for emergency response operations.
Additionally, it has come to our attention that federal OSHA will be issuing formal clarifications on the large quantity generator exemption and other issues. Your timely response on the advance first aid question and the impending clarifications would be greatly appreciated.
John A. Pompei Administrator Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division (503) 378-3272
cc: Richard Terrill, Region X OSHA Steve Beech