- Standard Number:
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
March 13, 1984
Mr. W. William Ament
Organization Resources Counselors, Inc.
1625 I Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
Dear Mr. Ament:
This is in response to your letter of January 16 concerning OSHA Instruction CPL 2-2.35A, which provides internal Agency guidelines for enforcing 29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1) a provision of the occupational noise standard applying to general industry and maritime employment. 29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1) requires that feasible administrative or engineering controls be utilized to correct employee overexposure to noise.
The term "laboratory-based noise reduction" that is used at l.a. of Appendix A of CPL 2-2.35A means the noise attenuating effectiveness allotted to the hearing protectors using test data that has been obtained in a laboratory following ANSI S3.19-1974 or ANSI Z24.22-1957 procedures. A mathematical resolution of the laboratory test data is required to arrive at the noise attenuating effectiveness for a hearing protector. The method of resolving the data may be the one developed by the Environmental Protection Agency to provide what is termed the Noise Reduction Rating (NRR), or it may be one of the three developed by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). The NIOSH methods are described in the "List of Personal Hearing Protectors and Attenuation Data," HEW Publication No. (NIOSH) 76-120, 1975, pages 21-37.
The examples given on the enclosed page illustrate the application of a 50 percent safety factor to the "laboratory-based noise reduction" for a hearing protector.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide assistance in this matter. If we may serve you again in the future, we shall be glad to do so.
John B. Miles, Jr.
Directorate of Field Operations