Alert: Due to routine maintenance on the OSHA website, some pages are temporarily unavailable.
To report an emergency, file a complaint with OSHA or ask a safety and health question, call 1-800-321-6742 (OSHA).

  • Record Type:
    OSHA Instruction
  • Current Directive Number:
    CPL 02-00-035
  • Old Directive Number:
    CPL 2.35 CH-19
  • Title:
    Changes to the Regulatory and General Industry Standard Alleged Violation...
  • Information Date:
  • Standard Number:
Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-19 NOV 18, 1991 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

Subject: Changes to the Regulatory and General Industry Standard Alleged Violation Elements (SAVEs) Manual

A. PURPOSE. This instruction transmits revised and new pages to the Regulatory and General Industry SAVEs Manual for "Occupational Exposures to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories."

B. SCOPE. This instruction applies OSHA-wide.

C. ACTION. Regional Administrators and Area Directors shall ensure that all compliance personnel:

1. Make the following page changes to the Regulatory and General Industry (SAVEs) Manual:
REMOVE PAGE INSERT PAGES

677 677 through 678
679 through 694
2. File a copy of this transmittal sheet behind OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-18 in the appropriate OSHA Directive System binder.

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-19 November 18, 1991 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

D. BACKGROUND. Final rule and regulations for 29 CFR 1910.1450, Occupational Exposures to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories, were published in the Federal Register, Vol.55, No.21, on January 31, 1990.

E. STATE PLAN STATES. Regional Administrators shall advise State designees of the action required by this instruction and encourage their participation in the SAVEs program.

Patricia K. Clark, Director Directorate of Compliance Programs

DISTRIBUTION: National, Regional, and Area Offices Compliance Officers State Designees Area Office Clericals 11(c)/405 Programs NIOSH Regional Program Directors

2

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-10 June 23, 1986 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

1 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:

(a) (LOCATION)(IDENTIFY EMPLOYEES, DEFICIENCIES AND CHEMICAL/PRODUCT)

2 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(iii): Employee training did not include the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including specific procedures the employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals:

(a) (LOCATION)(IDENTIFY EMPLOYEES, DEFICIENCIES AND CHEMICAL/PRODUCT)

3 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(iv): Employee training did not include the details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labeling system and the material safety data sheet, and how employees can obtain and use appropriate hazard information:

(a) (LOCATION)(IDENTIFY EMPLOYEES, DEFICIENCIES AND CHEMICAL/PRODUCT)

4 29 CFR 1910.1200(i)(12): Information which this section requires the chemical manufacturer, importer or employer to make available was not disclosed to the Assistant Secretary upon request:

(a) (LOCATION)(IDENTIFY CHEMICAL/PRODUCT)(SPECIFY WHAT INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED)

677

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-19 November 18, 1991 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

1 29 CFR 1910.1450(c): The employer did not ensure that laboratory employees' exposures to OSHA regulated substances did not exceed the permissible exposure limits specified in 29 CFR Part 1910, Subpart Z:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)
          NOTE 1:   This SAVE must be grouped with the
                    appropriate overexposure and/or engineering
                    SAVE in Subpart Z along with the required
                    abatement steps.
          NOTE 2:   Where appropriate respirators were not
                    provided or were used improperly, the
                    appropriate SAVEs from 29 CFR 1910.1450 (i)
                    and 29 CFR 1910.134 must also be grouped to
                    help support this SAVE.

2 29 CFR 1910.1450(d)(1): The employer did not measure the laboratory employee's exposure to a substance regulated by a standard which required monitoring when there was reason to believe that exposure levels for that substance routinely exceeded the action level (or in the absence of an action level, the PEL):

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)
NOTE: This SAVE must be grouped with the appropriate monitoring SAVEs in Subpart Z.

678

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-10 June 23, 1986 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

1 29 CFR 1910.1450(d)(2): When the initial monitoring of laboratory employee's exposure to a substance regulated by a standard as by 29 CFR 1910.1450(d)(1) disclosed employee exposure over the action level (or in the absence of an action level, the PEL), the employer did not immediately comply with the exposure monitoring provisions of the relevant standard:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)
          NOTE 1:   This SAVE must be grouped with the
                    appropriate monitoring SAVEs in Subpart Z.
          NOTE 2:   29 CFR 1910.1450(d)(3) Monitoring may be
                    terminated in accordance with the relevant
                    standard.

2 29 CFR 1910.1450(d)(4): The employer did not within 15 working days after the receipt of any monitoring results of laboratory employees' exposures to any substance regulated by a standard, notify the employee's of these results in writing either individually or by posting results in an appropriate location that was accessible to employees:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

3 29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(1): Where hazardous chemicals were used in the workplace, the employer did not develop and carry out the provisions of a written Chemical Hygiene Plan which was capable of protecting employees from health hazards associated with hazardous chemicals and which was capable of keeping exposures below the limits specified in 29 CFR 1910. 1450(c):

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)
          NOTE 1:   Appendix A of this section is non-mandatory
                    but provides guidance to assist employers in
                    the development of the Chemical Hygiene Plan.
NOTE 2: Cite this standard when no plan exists.

679

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-10 June 23, 1986 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

1 29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(1)(i): Where hazardous chemicals were used in the workplace, the employer did not develop and carry out the provisions of a written Chemical Hygiene Plan which were capable of protecting employees from health hazards associated with hazardous chemicals:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS) 2 29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(1)(ii): Where hazardous chemicals were used in the workplace, the employer did not develop and carry out the provisions of a written Chemical Hygiene Plan which were capable of keeping exposures below the limits specified in 29 CFR 1910.1450(c):
(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

3 29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(2): The employer's Chemical Hygiene Plan was not readily available to employees, or employee representatives:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

4 29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(3): The employer's Chemical Hygiene Plan did not indicate specific measures that the employer would take to ensure laboratory employee protection:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

5 29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(3)(i): The employer's Chemical Hygiene Plan did not include the standard operating procedures relevant to safety and health considerations to be followed when laboratory work involved the use of hazardous chemicals:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

680

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-10 June 23, 1986 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

OPTION 1 1 29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(3)(ii): The Chemical Hygiene Plan did not include the criteria that the employer would use to determine and implement control measures to reduce employee exposure to hazardous chemicals including engineering controls, the use of personal protective equipment and hygiene practices:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

OPTION 2 2 29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(3)(ii): The employer's Chemical Hygiene Plan did not give particular attention to the selection of control measures for chemicals known to be extremely hazardous:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

3 29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(3)(iii): The employer's Chemical Hygiene Plan did not include a requirement that fume hoods and other protective equipment functioned properly and did not include specific measures that would be taken to ensure proper and adequate performance of such equipment:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

4 29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(3)(iv): The employer's Chemical Hygiene Plan did not include provisions for employee information and training as prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1450(f):

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

681

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-10 June 23, 1986 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

1 29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(3)(v): The employer's Chemical Hygiene Plan did not specify the circumstances under which a particular laboratory operation, procedure or activity would require prior approval from the employer or employer's designee before implementation:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

2 29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(3)(vi): The employer's Chemical Hygiene Plan did not include provisions for medical consultation and medical examinations in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1450 (g):

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

3 29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(3)(vii): The employer's Chemical Hygiene Plan did not include the designation of personnel responsible for implementation of the Chemical Hygiene Plan, including the assignment of a Chemical Hygiene Officer; and when appropriate, establishment of a Chemical Hygiene Committee:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

OPTION 1 4 29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(3)(viii): The employer's Chemical Hygiene Plan did not provide for additional employee protection for work with particularly hazardous substances, such as "select carcinogens," reproductive toxins and substances which have a high degree of acute toxicity:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

682

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-10 June 23, 1986 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

OPTION 2 1 29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(3)(viii): The employer's Chemical Hygiene Plan did not include provisions for work with particularly hazardous substances giving specific consideration to the following ____________:

NOTE: Insert the appropriate language (A)-(D) to complete this SAVE.
(A) Establishment of a designated area:
(B) Use of containment devices, such as fume hoods or glove boxes:
(C) Procedures for safe removal of contaminated waste:
(D) Decontamination procedures:
(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)
NOTE: Cite Option 1 when all these requirements are not met.

2 29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(4): The employer did not review and evaluate the effectiveness of the Chemical Hygiene Plan at least annually and update it as necessary:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

683

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-10 June 23, 1986 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

1 29 CFR 1910.1450(f)(1): The employer did not provide laboratory employees with information and training to ensure that they were apprised of the hazards of chemicals present in their work area:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

2 29 CFR 1910.1450(f)(2): The employer did not provide laboratory employees with information and training at the time of their initial assignment to a work area where hazardous chemicals were present and/or prior to assignments involving new exposure situations:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

OPTION 1 3 29 CFR 1910.1450(f)(3)(i): The employer did not inform laboratory employees were not informed of the contents of this standard and its appendices:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

OPTION 2 4 29 CFR 1910.1450(f)(3)(i): The employer did not make the contents of this standard and its appendices available to the laboratory employees:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

684

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-10 June 23, 1986 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

1 29 CFR 1910.1450(f)(3)(ii): The employer did nor inform laboratory employees of the location and availability of the Chemical Hygiene Plan:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

2 29 CFR 1910.1450(f)(3)(iii): The employer did not inform laboratory employees of the permissible exposure limits for OSHA regulated substances or recommended exposure limits for other hazardous chemicals where there was no applicable OSHA standard:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

3 29 CFR 1910.1450(f)(3)(iv): The employer did not inform laboratory employees of signs and symptoms associated with exposure to hazardous chemicals used in the laboratory:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

4 29 CFR 1910.1450(f)(3)(v): The employer did not inform laboratory employees of the location and availability of known reference material on the hazards, safe handling, storage and disposal of hazardous chemicals found in the laboratory including, but not limited to, Material Safety Data Sheets received from the chemical supplier:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)
NOTE: You may check 29 CFR 1910.120 for additional violations to group with and support this requirement.

685

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-10 June 23, 1986 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

1 29 CFR 1910.1450(f)(4)(i)(A): Employee training did not include methods and observations that could be used to detect the presence or release of a hazardous chemical:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)
          NOTE 1:   Methods and observations may include
                    monitoring conducted by the employer,
                    continuous monitoring devices, visual
                    appearance or odor of hazardous chemicals
                    when released.
          NOTE 2:   29 CFR 1910.1450(f)(4)(i)(B) is covered by 29
                    CFR 1910.1450(f)(1).

2 29 CFR 1910.1450(f)(4)(i)(C): Employee training did not include the measures employees could take to protect themselves from the physical and health hazards of chemicals in the work area, including specific procedures implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS)
NOTE: Specific procedures shall include appropriate work practices, emergency procedures, and personal protective equipment to be used.

3 29 CFR 1910.1450(f)(4)(ii): The laboratory employee was not trained on the applicable details of the employer's written Chemical Hygiene Plan:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS)

686

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-10 June 23, 1986 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

1 29 CFR 1910.1450(g)(1): An employee who worked with a hazardous chemical was not provided an opportunity to receive a follow-up examination which the examining physician had determined to be necessary under the circumstances described in 29 CFR 1910.1450(g)(1), paragraphs (i), (ii), and (iii):

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

2 29 CFR 1910.1450(g)(1)(i): Employees who had developed signs or symptoms associated with a hazardous chemical to which the employee could have been exposed in the laboratory, were not provided an opportunity to receive an appropriate medical examination:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

3 29 CFR 1910.1450(g)(1)(ii): Where laboratory exposure monitoring had revealed an exposure level routinely above the action level (or in the absence of an action level, the PEL) for an OSHA regulated substance for which there are exposure monitoring medical surveillance requirements, but medical surveillance was not eastablished for the affected laboratory employees, as prescribed by the particular standard:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)
NOTE: This SAVE must be grouped with the appropriate medical surveillance SAVEs in Subpart Z.

687

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-10 June 23, 1986 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

1 29 CFR 1910.1450(g)(1)(iii): A spill, leak, explosion or other occurrence resulting in the likelihood of a hazardous exposure had occurred, but the affected laboratory employees were not provided an opportunity for a medical consultation for the purpose of determining the need for a medical examination:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

OPTION 1 2 29 CFR 1910.1450(g)(2): All medical examinations and consultations for laboratory employees exposed to hazardous chemicals were not performed by or under the direct supervision of a licensed physician:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

OPTION 2 3 29 CFR 1910.1450(g)(2): All medical examinations and consultations for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals were not provided without cost to the employee and without loss of pay:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

OPTION 3 4 29 CFR 1910.1450(g)(2): All medical examinations and consultations for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals were not provided at a reasonable time and place:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

688

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-10 June 23, 1986 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

1 29 CFR 1910.1450(g)(3)(i): The employer did not provide to the physician the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) to which the employee could have been exposed:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

2 29 CFR 1910.1450(g)(3)ii): The employer did not provide to the physician a description of the conditions under which the exposure to the employee occurred including quantitative exposure data:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

3 29 CFR 1910.1450(g)(3)(iii): The employer did not provide to the physician a description of the signs and symptoms of exposure that the employee was experiencing:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

4 29 CFR 1910.1450(g)(4)(i): For an examination or consultation required under this standard, the employer did not obtain a written opinion from the examining physician:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

689

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-10 June 23, 1986 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

1 29 CFR 1910.1450(g)(4)(i)(A): For an examination or consultation required under this standard, the employer did not obtain a written opinion from the examining physician which indicated whether further medical follow-up was needed:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)
NOTE: Cite only when there was a deficiency and the employer had failed to properly instruct the physician on the content of the written opinion or where the employer knew or should have known that the physician was not complying with such instructions.

2 29 CFR 1910.1450(g)(4)(i)(B): For an examination or consultation required under this standard, the employer did not obtain a written opinion from the examining physician which included the results of the medical examination and any associated tests.

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)
NOTE: Cite only when there was a deficiency and the employer had failed to properly instruct the physician on the content of the written opinion or where the employer knew or should have known that the physician was not complying with such instructions.

690

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-10 June 23, 1986 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

1 29 CFR 1910.1450(g)(4)(i)(C): For an examination or consultation required under this standard, the employer did not obtain a written opinion from the examining physician which identified a medical condition revealed in the course of the examination, that could have placed the employee at increased risk as a result of exposure to a hazardous chemical found in the workplace:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)
NOTE: Cite only when there was a deficiency and the employer had failed to properly instruct the physician on the content of the written opinion or where the employer knew or should have known that the physician was not complying with such instructions.

2 29 CFR 1910.1450(g)(4)(i)(D): For an examination or consultation required under this standard, the employer did not obtain a written opinion from the examining physician which included a statement that the employee had been informed by the physician of the results of the consultation or medical examination and of any medical condition that could require further examination or treatment:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)
NOTE: Cite only when there was a deficiency and the employer had failed to properly instruct the physician on the content of the written opinion or where the employer knew or should have known that the physician was not complying with such instructions.

3 29 CFR 1910.1450(g)(4)(ii): The physician's written opinion revealed specific findings of diagnoses unrelated to the occupational exposure of the employee:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

691

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-10 June 23, 1986 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

1 29 CFR 1910.1450(h)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that labels on incoming containers of hazardous chemicals were not removed or defaced:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

2 29 CFR 1910.1450(h)(1)(ii): The employer did not maintain the material safety data sheets that were received with incoming shipments of hazardous chemicals, and ensure that they were readily accessible to laboratory employees:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

OPTION 1 3 29 CFR 1910.1450(h)(2)(i): The composition of the chemical substance produced exclusively for the laboratory's use was known, but the employer did not determine if it was a hazardous chemical as defined in 29 CFR 1910.1450(b):

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS) (DESCRIBE HAZARD(S) WHERE NECESSARY)

OPTION 2 4 29 CFR 1910.1450(h)(2)(i): A chemical substance developed and produced exclusively for the laboratory's use was determined to be hazardous, but the employer did not provide appropriate training as required by 29 CFR 1910.1450(f):

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)
NOTE: Group with the appropriate 1910.1450(f) SAVEs if training was provided but was deficient.

692

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-10 June 23, 1986 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

1 29 CFR 1910.1450(h)(2)(ii): When a chemical substance had been developed in the laboratory as a by-product but the composition was not known, the employer did not implement the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1450(e):

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)
NOTE: Group with the appropriate 29 CFR 1910.1450(e) SAVEs if some but not all of the requirements of this section were implemented.

2 29 CFR 1910.1450(h)(2)(iii): A chemical substance developed in the laboratory was produced for another user outside of the laboratory, but the employer did not comply with the Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200) including the requirements for preparation of material safety data sheets and labeling:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

OPTION 1 3 29 CFR 1910. 1450(i): Where the use of respirators was necessary to maintain exposure below permissible exposure limits, but the employer did not provide, at no cost to the employee, the proper respiratory equipment:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

693

OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-10 June 23, 1986 Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance

OPTION 2 1 29 CFR 1910.1450(i): The use of respirators was necessary to maintain exposure below permissible exposure limits, but the respirators were not selected and used in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.134:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)
NOTE: This SAVE should be grouped with the appropriate SAVE for 29 CFR 1910.1450(c).

2 29 CFR 1910.1450(j)(1): Where the employer did not establish and maintain for each laboratory employee an accurate record of measurements taken to monitor employee exposures and any medical consultation and examinations including tests or written opinions required by this standard:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)

3 29 CFR 1910.1450(j)(2): The employer did not ensure that records of measurements taken to monitor laboratory employee exposures and any medical consultation and examinations were kept, transferred and made available in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.20:

(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)
694


Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.