2. Range and Detection Limit
1.1.1 This method describes the sampling of hydrogen peroxide using TiOSO4 and the analysis of hydrogen peroxide by differential pulse
1.2 Advantages and Disadvantages
1.2.1 The analytical method is simple and specific.
1.3 Principle (7.4)
1.2.2 The TiOSO4 complex is stable for over seven weeks.
(See the H2O2 backup report).
1.2.3 The collection of hydrogen peroxide can be monitored by observing the clear TiOSO4 solution change to a yellow color when the TiOSO4-H2O2 complex forms.
1.2.4 The method has better sensitivity than the calorimetric method
(7.1) and has fewer interferences (see H2O2 backup report).
1.3.1 The sample is collected using a midget fritted-glass bubbler containing 15 mL TiOSO4.
1.3.2 The sample is analyzed for H2O2 by differential pulse polarography at a dropping mercury electrode. The current (in
µA) of known standards are plotted against the concentrations of the standards to quantitate the H2O2.
2.1 The detection limit is 0.10 ppm for a 100 L air Sample. The working analytical range is 5 to 100
3. Precision and Accuracy
3.1 Eighteen samples were spiked at three levels corresponding to levels of 1/2, 1, and 2 times the PEL. The CV1,
(pooled) for the three levels is 0.0261.
4.1 Very high levels of strong oxidants and reductants will interfere with the analysis. See the H2O2 backup report.
6. Analytical Procedure
5.1.1. An air sampling pump capable of operating at sampling rate of 1.0
L/min. The pump must be properly calibrated so that the
volume of air sampled can be determined accurately from the flow rate and time.
5.1.2 Midget fritted-glass bubbler.
5.1.3 0.00115 M TiOSO4 collection solution.
5.2.1 Sampling is done in accordance with current instructions contained in OSHA directives to the industrial hygienist.
5.2.2 The sample is collected in a midget fritted-glass bubbler containing 10 to 15 mL of 0.00115
M TiOSO4 solution (6.2.3) using a flow rate of 1.0 liter per minute. A 100 liter air sample is recommended.
5.2.3 Ship to the laboratory as soon as possible. Do not use metal capliners in the vial caps and tape the lids shut. Send one blank with every 10 samples.
6.1.1 25-mL Class A burette with Teflon stopcock.
6.2 Reagents - All chemicals should be ACS reagent grade or equivalent, and the dilution water must be deionized.
6.1.2 Glass volumetric pipettes.
6.1.3 Micropipettes with tips.
6.1.4 125-mL Erlenmeyer flask.
6.1.5 Polargraphic analyzer - model 374 or 384 manufactured by Princeton Applied
Research (PAR) or equivalent.
6.1.6 Static mercury drop electrode - PAR 303 or- equivalent.
6.1.7 15-mL glass or polyethylene polargraphic cells.
6.1.8 Nitrogen purification apparatus.
6.2.1 0.0575 M Titanium Oxysulfate: Add 4.6 g TiOSO4, 20 g (NH4)2SO4 and 100 mL concentrated H2SO4 to a 500 mL beaker. See precautions in 6.3.1. Heat gradually for several
minutes until the chemicals are dissolved. Cool the mixture to room temperature and pour carefully into about 350 mL deionized water in a 500 mL volumetric flask. Filter the solution through an HA filter to remove any particulates, and dilute to 500 mL. The solution should be stable for 6 months.
6.2.2 0.00575 N Titanium 0xysulfate: Take a 1-10 dilution of the 0.0575
M TiOSO4 stock solution by adding 10 mL of the stock solution
(6.2.1) to a 100 mL volumetric flask and diluting to volume with deionized water. This solution should be made fresh monthly.
6.2.3 0.00575 M Titanium 0xysulfate: Take a 1:50 dilution of the stock TiOSO4 solution
(6.2.1) by adding 2 mL of the stock to a 100 mL volumetric flask and diluting to volume with deionized water. This solution should be made fresh monthly.
6.2.4 Supporting electrolyte: Add 53 g (NH4)2SO4, 38 g EDTA, and 75 mL of 28.8%
(NH4)OH to about 500 mL deionized water in a 1000 mL volumetric flask. Let cool, then dilute to 1000 mL with D.I. water.
6.2.5 4 N Sulfuric Acid: Slowly add 112 mL H2SO4 to about 500 mL deionized water in a 1 L volumetric flask, stir and let cool. See precautions in 6.3.1. Dilute to 1 L with deionized water.
6.2.6 Starch indicator solution: To 5 g starch add a little cold water and grind in a mortar to a thin paste. Scrape into
1 L of boiling distilled water, stir, and let the covered solution settle overnight. Decant the clear supernate into a brown bottle and preserve with 4 g zinc chloride.
6.2.7 0.1 M Sodium Thiosulfate: Add 24.82 g Na2S2O3·H20 to about 500 mL deioized water in a 1000 mL volumetric flask and let dissolve. Dilute to volume deionized water. Add two or three mL chloroform to minimize bacterial decomposition.
6.2.8 1 M Ammonium Molybdate: Add 20.6 g (NH4)6Mo7O24 to about 50 mL deionized water in a 100 mL volumetric flask and dissolve. Dilute to volume with deionized water. Store in glass.
6.2.9 1 M Potassium Iodide: Add 33.2 g of KI crystals to 100 mL deionized water, dissolve, and dilute to 1 L. Store in a brown bottle.
6.3.1 When handling mercury, hydrogen peroxide, or sulfuric acid, gloves and safety glasses must be worn. Extreme care must be observed to avoid splashing or spilling on skin. Add sulfuric acid to water very carefully and never add water to sulfuric acid. Sulfuric acid gives off a great deal of heat when added to water and can splatter or boil violently. To prevent tile heat from shattering the volumetric flask, place the flask in a cool water bath and add the sulfuric acid a little at a time.
6.4 Sample Preparation
6.3.2 Refer to the polarographic instruction manual for instrumental safety precautions
(7.2, section I-1, and 7.3 section I-1).
6.4.1 Open the collection vial and measure the sample volume using a graduated cylinder. Take an aliquot of sample and transfer to a 15 mL
polarographic cell. The sample aliquot size will depend on the intensity of the color of the collecting solution. If the sample is very yellow, use a 1 mL aliquot of sample and add 4.0 mL of the 0.00115 N TiOSO4
(6.2.4) If the sample is colorless, use a 5 mL aliquot.
6.5 Standard Preparation
6.4.2 Add 5 mL of the supporting electrolyte (6.2.4) to give a total volume of 10 mL and analyze by differential pulse polarography.
6.5.1 A hydrogen peroxide stock solution is prepared by placing 2 mL of 30% H2O2 in a 500
mL volumetric flask and diluting to volume with deionized water. This is approximately 1200 µg/mL H2O2.
6.5.2 A hydrogen peroxide standard solution is prepared by placing 1 mL of the H2O2 stock
(6.5) in a 100 mL
volumetric flask and diluting to volume with deionized water. This is approximately 12
6.5.3 Prepare a series of standards in the analytical range of 6 to 48
µg by adding the following serial dilutions. Add to the polarographic cell the appropriate
aliquot of the H2O2 standard solution (6.5.2) and aliquots of deionized
water using the calibrated nicropipettes. Add 1 mL of the 0.00575 M TiOSO4
(6.2.2) and 5 mL of the supporting electrolyte (6.2.4) to make a total volume of 10
6.6.1 Turn on the polarograph, Model 384 and 303 and allow to warm up for at least 30
6.6.2 Analyze the standards and samples by differential
pulse polarography using the following instrumental conditions:
This method is stored as Method No. 2 in the PAR, Model 384.
6.6.3 Prepare the samples and working standard solutions as described in sections
6.6.4 Purge each standard and sample for 5 minutes pre-purified nitrogen.
6.6.5 Analyze the reagent blank, standards, and the samples. A standard
should be re-analyzed after every 4 or 5 samples.
6.6.6 Record the peak current and potential for each
standard and sample in the laboratory notebook. The differential pulse
polarogram of hydrogen peroxide gives a peak at approximately -0.940 V.
6.6.7 If any of the samples have enough hydrogen peroxide to be over the
PEL, the 1200 µg/mL stock (6.5.1) must be standardized against the 0.1 H
sodium thiosulfate (6.2.7) before a standard curve is prepared. See 6.6.9 through
6.6.8 Use any available least square regression program to plot a calibration curve of
peak current vs. concentration (ppm, ppb, or total µg) of the standards.
6.6.9 To standardize the H2O2 stock solution, transfer the
following solutions to a 125 mL Erlenmeyer flask.
1. 10 mL stock 1200 µg/mL H2O2 (6.5.1)
2. 10 mL 2N H2SO4 (6.2.5)
3. 6 mL 1N KI (6.2.9)
4. 3 drops 1N (NH4)6Mo7O24
5. 20 mL D.I. water
6.6.10 The Solution is titrated to a very faint yellow with 0.1
N Na2S2O3 (6.2.7) and then 1 mL starch solution
(6.2.6) is added to produce a blue color. The titration is continued until the solution becomes colorless.
6.6.11 The total amount of Na2S2O3
required to reach the endpoint is determined (about 10 mL) and recorded.
6.6.12 Calculate the concentration of the 1200 µg/mL H2O2
stock, the 12 µg/mL standard, and the actual concentrations of the standards to be
used in the standard curve.
6.7.1 Subtract the initial volume of sodium thiosulfate from the volume at the endpoint. This is the total
volume of Na2S2O3 used.
2 S2O3= + H202 + 2 H+ -----> S4O6
= + 2 H20
M Na2S2O3 × V Na2S2O3
= 2 × M H2O2 × V H2O2
0.1 × mL Na2S2O3 used = M H2O2
× 2 × 10 mL, and:
mmoles H202 = mmoles Na2S2O3
× 1/2 then:
mg H2O2 = mmoles Na2S2O3
1/2 × 34
= mmoles Na2S2O3
6.7.2 The weight of H2O2 in a sample aliquot is determined
from the calibration curve. The total weight of H2O2
is calculated front the equation:
µg H2O2 = (aliq. µg - blank aliq.)(sample vol. mL)
(sample aliquot vol, mL)
6.7.3 The concentration of H2O2 is calculated in
µg/L, converted to mg/m3, and then to ppm.
µg H202/liters sampled = mg/m3 and;
ppm H2O2 = mg/m3 × 24.45/34 = mg/m3
× 0.719 ppm
7.1 Hydrogen Peroxide Colorimetric Method, Method No: VI-6, Last Revised on
January 26, 1978.
7.2 Instruction Manuals Polarographic Analyzer, Model 374 and Hanging
Mercury Drop Electrode Model 303, Princeton Applied Research, Princeton,
7.3 Polarographic Instruction Manual, Model 384, Princeton, NJ.
7.4 Boto, K.G., and Williams, L.F.G., Analytical Chimica Acta, Vol. 85,
pp 179-183 (1976).
Backup Data Report
Substance: Hydrogen Peroxide
OSHA-PEL. 1.0 ppm = TWA
Chemical used for validation: Hydrogen Peroxide. Analytical Reagent. 30 S.
The general procedure used is described in the OSHA Sampling and
Analytical Method (SAM) for hydrogen peroxide. Instrumental analysis was done by Carl Cook (See
Reference 8.1). This method replaces the colorimetric method (8.2).
The analysis of hydrogen peroxide is by differential pulse polarography (DPP). see
reference 8.1. 5.0 mL of the supporting electrolyte and 5.0 ML of the sample or standard solution is placed in a 10
mL sample cell. The sample or standard must be in 5.0 mL 0.00115 M TiOSO4. This
gives a much sharper and larger peak than 4 or less mL of the 0.00115 M TiOSO4
as can be seen from the diagram below.
Hydrogen peroxide was generated by adding 25 ML of 30 % hydrogen
peroxide to a flask and heating the flask while bubbling N2 through the solution at a rate of
1 LPM. The hydrogen peroxide was collected in 15 mL of TiOSO4
in a midget fretted glass bubbler.
4. Collection Efficiency
Hydrogen peroxide was generated for 40 minutes, and while the 1st
impinger collected 500 µg/mL H202 (about 60 times the
PEL), the 2nd impinger showed no hydrogen peroxide collected. This means at levels below 60
times the PEL there is 100 % collection efficiency.
5. Storage Stability
To assess the stability of hydrogen peroxide in TiOSO4, a time study was conducted at the
0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 PEL level.
On 1/9/84, 24 samples were prepared for analysis over a two mouth period to determine the storage stability.
Assuming that 100 L of air were taken in 15 mL TiOSO4, there would be 75
µg H202 found in a sample at 1/2 the PEL. 150 µg at
the PEL, and 300 µg at 2 times the PEL. Eight samples were prepared at each level and contained 15 mL of 0.00115 M TiOSO4,
plus the spiked H202 concentration. Table I gives
the results of the stability study.
Table I Stability Study Data
From the results it can be seen that hydrogen peroxide is stable in TiOSO4
for 51 days, or almost 2 months. One problem that was noticed was that although the hydrogen
peroxide-TiOSO4 complex is stable for two months, the TiOSO4
stock solution (0.05775 M) and subsequent diluted solutions of the 0.05775
M TiOSO4 stock solution are not stable. A comparison of the 0.05775
M QC stock solution and the 0.05775 M Laboratory stock solution showed
significant differences. The QC stock was 12 months old and the lab stock was 3
months old. When analyzed by the calorimetric method, samples spiked with
96 µg in the QC Stock showed 80 µg, whereas samples spiked with 96 µg and
collected in the lab stock showed 96 µg. The standards were made using the lab
stock TiOSO4. When the samples were analyzed by DPP, all the
samples showed 96 µg. This is due either to the fact that the QC stock solution is 9
months older than the lab stock solution or differences in solution preparation. This points out another problem with the
colorimetric analysis. The results indicate that age and/or makeup of the TiOSO4
solutions are not as important when the DPP method is used.
Table II shows the effects of different interferents on the analysis of hydrogen peroxide. 96
µg of hydrogen peroxide was placed in a 10 mL sample cell along with different levels of
interferent. From Table II it can be seen that the only serious
interferent with the DPP method is KMnO4 which will also prevent the analysis of hydrogen peroxide using a calorimetric method.
Additionally KI does not effect the analysis of hydrogen peroxide by DPP but does
prevent the analysis or hydrogen peroxide using the colorimetric method.
Table II Effect of Interferent on the Analysis of Hydrogen Peroxide
|µg H202 Added
|| H202/Interferent ratio
||Peak location (V)
||0.4 ppm SnCl2
||20 ppm KClO4
||0.2 ppm KMnO4*
||0.8 ppm NH2OH HCl
||2860 ppm Na2S2OH·HCl
||10 ppm Cr2O3
||33200 ppm KI*
||20 ppm K2S2O8
*These were highly colored and would not allow analysis by the
7. Precision and Accuracy
The last day of a study was on day 51, the results from day 51 are tabulated below.
|# of Samples Analyzed
The CV1 [pooled] for the three sets of samples was 0.0261. Six
samples for each of the three different concentration ranges were used.
Below are typical polarograms of 120 µg and 75 µg H202
respectively in a 10-mL sample cell.
1. Hydrogen Peroxide in Workplace Atmospheres, Method No: ID-126-SG.
2. Hydrogen Peroxide Colorimetric Method, Method No: VI-6, Last Revised
on January 26, 1978.