|<< Back to Sampling and Analytical Methods
For problems with accessibility in using figures, illustrations and PDFs in this method, please contact the SLTC at (801) 233-4900.
These procedures were designed and tested for internal use by OSHA personnel. Mention of any company name or commercial product does not constitute endorsement by OSHA.
Aluminum Oxide in Workplace Atmospheres - (Inorganic Method #198sg)
Related Information: Chemical Sampling - Aluminum Oxide
|OSHA Standard:||10.0 mg/m3
|Collection Procedure:||A known volume of air is drawn through a 0.80 µm AA filter.
|Recommended Air Volume:||960 liters maximum
|Recommended Sampling Rate:||2.0 liters per minute
|Analytical Procedure:||The filter is digested with acids using a microwave and is analyzed
by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS).
|Quantitative Detection Limit:||0.025 ppm
Aluminum Oxide in Workplace Atmospheres
This method describes the collection on a 0.80 m AA filter and analysis using Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy of
Aluminum Oxide (Al203). The method measures the total
concentration of Al203 as aluminum.
Originally, aluminum oxide samples were collected on an AA filter, digested by acid digestion,
and analyzed by AAS. This procedure was abandoned when it was found to give low recoveries.
Prior to the use of this method, Al203 was collected on PVC filters, weighted, and sent to the lab
only if the sample weight allowed the sample to be over the standard. The filters were digested
using a borate fusion and analyzed by AAS. There is no significant difference between the means
of the found/theoretical values of the microwave and the borate fusion digestions at a 95%
confidence level (See Appendix I).
1.2. Uses (9.1.)
About 90% of aluminum oxide is used in the production of aluminum metal. The remainder is
used in applications such as flame retardant filters, preparation of aluminum compounds,
pigments, absorbants, catalysts, ceramics, refectories, and abrasives.
1.3. Physical Properties (9.2.)
2. Working Range and Detection Limit
|Physical Characteristics:||White powder, insoluble in water
|Specific Gravity:||3.4 - 4.0
|Melting Point:||2030 °C
2.1. The upper limit of sample analysis is based on the upper limit of linearity of the atomic absorption
analysis of aluminum which is 50 µg/mL (50 ppm). (9.3.)
2.2. The lower limit of sample analysis is based on the detection limit of 0.05 µg/mL. For a 50 mL
sample volume and a 100 liter air volume, the lower limit is 0.025 mg/m3.
3.1. Aluminum and salts of aluminum can cause an interference. If aluminum or its compounds are
present, they must be reported to the laboratory.
4. Advantages and Disadvantages
4.1. The method is less tedious than the borate fusion method.
5. Sampling Procedure
4.2. The sampling procedure uses AA filters as opposed to PVC filters and the weighing step is not necessary.
5.1. Apparatus - 0.80 µm AA filters, personal sampling pumps which are calibrated at the
recommended flow rate with an AA filter in line to an accuracy of ±10% at the 95% confidence limit.
6. Analytical Procedure
5.2. The AA filter is attached to a calibrated personal sampling pump and the sampling tube is placed
in the worker's breathing zone or in a area of, the workplace. At least 100 liters and no more than
960 liters of air should be drawn through the sampling tube at a rate of 2.0 liters/minute. (9.5.)
5.3. After the desired sampling period is completed, the filter is removed from the pump. The filter is
properly identified and sealed with an OSHA Form 21, and then shipped to the laboratory for analysis.
5.4. With each batch of up to 20 samples, a blank filter which has had no air drawn through it, is
submitted for analysis. The blank filter should be from the same lot of filters as those used for sampling.
5.5. It is very important that when aluminum or salts of aluminum are known to be present in the
workplace atmosphere, they should be listed.
6.1. Apparatus - Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer and appropriate volumetric glassware for
dilutions and standard preparation.
7. Standard Preparation
6.2. Reagents - All reagents used should be ACS analyzed reagent grade or better.
6.2.1. Deionized water with a specific conductance of 10 µmho/cm or less for preparation of
standards, samples, dilutions, and other solutions which will be used in the analysis.
6.3. Safety Precautions
6.2.2. Potassium Chloride (KCl).
6.2.3. Potassium Chloride, 5000 ppm solution. Add 9.54 grams of potassium chloride to a 1000 mL
volumetric flask and dilute to volume with deionized water.
6.2.4. Acid Digestion Solution. Make the acid digestion solution by adding Sulfuric, Phosphoric, and
Nitric Acids in a 2:2:1 ratio.
6.2.5. Aluminum Stack Standard (1000 µg/mL CH3C00¯). Use 1000 ppm Aluminum Stock
Standard. Aluminum working standards are made by diluting the stock solution with
deionized water and by adding enough KCl solution to prepare the standards in 1000 ppm KCl.
6.3.1. Care should be exercised when using laboratory glassware. Chipped pipettes, volumetric
flasks, beakers, or any glassware with sharp edges exposed should not be used to avoid the
possibility of cuts, abrasions, and lost samples.
6.3.2. Pipetting should never be done by mouth - a bulb should always be used.
7.1. Working standards are prepared in the analytical range of 0.5 µg/mL to 50 µg/mL from dilutions
of the 1000 µg/mL stock solutions. These standard solutions should be prepared in 1000 ppm KCl.
8. Sample Preparation
8.1. If the air volume is greater than or equal to 100 liters, moisten the filter with deionized water and
place the filter in the bottom of the Teflon microwave vessel. Pipette 5 mL of acid solution into
each vessel, and cap using the capping station. If the air volume is less than 100 liters use 2.5 mL acid solution.
9. Analysis (9.4.)
8.2. Place the reaction vessels, with tubes, into the microwave rack and close the door. Set the time
to 2 minutes per vessel. For example, if you use all 12 vessels, set the time to 24 minutes. Next
set the power to 50%. Start the microwave. After the digestion is over let the samples cool for about an hour.
8.3. Uncap the vessels using the capping station and pour the digested solutions into 50 mL
volumetric flasks. Rinse the vessels several times with deionized water and add the rinse
solutions to the volumetric flasks. Add 10 mL of the 5000 ppm KCl solution. If the air volume is
less than 100 liters, pour the digested solutions into 25 mL volumetric flasks and add 5 mL of the
5000 ppm KCl solution.
8.4. For general microwave instructions refer to the Microwave Bulk and Wipe Digestion Procedure.
9.1. For general instrument start up and operation, refer to the Atomic Absorption Standard Operating Procedure.
9.1.1. The normal instrument parameters are:
9.2.1. Absorbance standards are used to construct a standard curve using the OSHA Auto AA
Program. The sample results are obtained from a plot of absorbance vs. concentration. The
blank corrected sample values are then calculated using the Auto AA Program. Air
Concentration values are calculated by the computer, using a gravimetric factor of 1.8989.
9.3. Reporting Results for Compounds Determined by Atomic Absorption
9.3.1. Results are reported on the OSHA Form 91 in mg/m3 for Al203, using two significant figures.
9.3.2. The estimated detection limit calculated by the Auto AA Program is reported on the OSHA
Form 91 when no analyte is detected.
9.3.3. All data processor printouts and chart recorded chromatograms are filed in a central file
according to. laboratory sample identification.
9.3.4. Calculations are checked by a fellow chemist before the completed OSHA Form 91's are given to the supervisor.
Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Third Edition, 1978, Vol. 2, pg. 218.
The Condensed Chemical Dictionary, Tenth Edition, 1981, pg. 42.
10.3. Analytical Methods for Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry, Perkin-Elmer Corporation, 1975.
10.4. OSHA Sampling and Analytical Techniques Table, Industrial Hygienists Field Operations Manual,
OSHA Instruction CPL 2-2.20, April 2, 1979.
This Method Was Last Revised On August 11, 1988
COMPARISON OF MICROWAVE DIGESTION WITH BORATE FUSION
Degrees of Freedom = 22, alpha = 0.05, Critical Region = 2.074, t = 0.079
Using the t-test, it was found that there is no significant difference between the sample means at the 95%