 |
Trucking Industry |
|
| OSHA Standards |
|
|
|
OSHA regulations govern the safety and health of the workers
and the responsibilities of employers to ensure their safety at the warehouse,
dock, construction site, and in other places truckers go to deliver and pick up
loads throughout the country. While OSHA does not regulate self-employed
truckers, it does regulate workplaces to which the truckers deliver goods and
the workers which receive those goods.
The trucking industry is addressed in
specific standards for recordkeeping and the general industry. This page highlights OSHA standards, directives
(instructions for compliance officers), standard interpretations (official
letters of interpretation of the standards), and whistleblower protection may be
applicable to a trucker depending on the location, activity, type of material
handled and industry.
OSHA
Section 5(a)(1) of the OSH Act, often referred to as the General Duty
Clause, requires employers to "furnish to each of his employees employment and a
place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or
are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees". Section
5(a)(2) requires employers to "comply with occupational safety and health
standards promulgated under this Act".
| Note:
Twenty-four states, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands have
OSHA-approved
State Plans and have adopted their own standards and enforcement policies. For the most part, these States adopt standards that are
identical to Federal OSHA. However, some States have adopted different standards applicable to this topic or may have different enforcement
policies. |
Section 4(b)1
OSHA is preempted by
Section 4(b)1 of the OSH Act from enforcing its regulations if
a working condition is regulated by another Federal agency.
For example:
- While traveling on public highways, the Department of
Transportation (DOT) has jurisdiction. However, while loading
and unloading trucks, OSHA regulations govern the safety and
health of the workers and the responsibilities of employers to
ensure their safety at the warehouse, at the dock, at the rig,
at the construction site, at the airport terminal and in all
places truckers go to deliver and pick up loads.
- While operating at an airport, if there is an operational
plan negotiated between the carrier and the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) that covers a working condition, then the
FAA has jurisdiction.
- Due to the DOT brake regulation, OSHA does not cite for
failure to chock trailer wheels if the vehicle is otherwise
adequately secured. DOT's regulation preempts enforcement and
DOT has jurisdiction. However, if the vehicle is an intrastate
truck, OSHA has jurisdiction. Only another Federal agency may
preempt OSHA's jurisdiction.
Frequently Cited Standards
The following standards, in order, were the most
frequently cited by Federal OSHA from October 2005 through September 2006, in
Motor Freight Transportation and Warehousing Industry Group (SIC
code 42).
-
1910.178, Powered industrial trucks [related topic
page]
-
1910.1200, Hazard communication [related
topic page]
-
1910.305, Wiring methods, components, and equipment for
general use [related
topic page]
-
1910.37, Maintenance, safeguards, and operational features for
exit routes
-
1910.303, General requirements (electrical) [related topic
page]
-
1910.157, Portable fire extinguishers
-
1910.132, General requirements (personal protective equipment) [related topic
page]
-
1910.23, Guarding floor and wall openings and holes [related
topic page]
-
1910.147, The control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout) [related topic
page]
-
1910.134, Respiratory protection [related topic
page]
Other Highlighted Standards
-
1904, Recording and reporting occupational injuries and illness
General Industry (29
CFR 1910)
Directives
-
Compliance Assistance for the Powered Industrial Truck Operator
Training Standards. CPL 02-02-028 [CPL 2-1.28A], (2000,
November 30). Provides compliance
assistance for the revised powered industrial truck operator
training standard.
-
Chocking of Tractor Trailer under the Powered Industrial Truck
Standard. CPL 02-01-030 [CPL 2-1.30], (1999, October 20). Establishes policy to ensure proper
enforcement of
29 CFR 1910.178(k)(1) and
1910.178(m)(7).
-
Inspection procedures for the Hazardous Waste Operations and
Emergency Response Standard, 29 CFR 1910.120 and 1926.65,
Paragraph (q): Emergency Response to Hazardous Substance Releases.
CPL 02-02-059 [CPL 2-2.59A], (1998, April 24). Clarifies the differences between releases that may be
incidental or require an emergency response depending on the
circumstances, and gives as an example an accidental spill on a
motor carrier.
-
Inspection Procedures for the Hazard Communication Standard.
CPL 02-02-038 [CPL 2-2.38D], (1998, March 20).
Additional information is provided in an 87 KB
PPT*,
31 slides.
-
1910.147, The Control of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout) -
Inspection Procedures and Interpretive Guidance. STD
01-05-019 [STD 1-7.3], (1990, September 11). References Powered Industrial Trucks
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(4),
including lockout/tagout requirements.
-
29 CFR 1910.178(k)(1) and (m)(7), Mechanical Means to Secure
Trucks or Trailers to a Loading Dock. STD 01-11-007 [STD 1-11.7],
(1981, August 5). Allows the use of a
mechanical means to secure trucks or trailers to a loading dock in
situations in which they provide the equivalent protection of
wheel chocks.
- Search all available directives.
Standard Interpretations
-
Review of Policy on Section 4(b)(1) of the Act. (1989, July
10). Discusses the scope
of
Section 4(b)1; that is, if the other agency's regulation (or
the lack of one) does not cover the hazard in question, then the OSH
Act's requirements are not preempted. The terms "working conditions"
and "gap theory," are discussed. For example, if the Office of Motor
Carrier Safety (OMCS) has a regulation addressing a certain working
condition (or hazard), then OSHA would be preempted from applying
its standards to that hazard.
Highway Driving
Loading and Unloading
-
Host employers may require site-specific forklift training of
visiting workers. (1999, October 28). Determines that employers are entitled to require that
employees who operate power pallet jacks have a training
beyond that required by the regulation and that they be trained
specifically in the equipment and conditions at its worksite.
-
Applicability of the HCS to diesel exhaust emissions and diesel
fuel. (1998, December 22). Indicates that diesel exhaust
emissions are not covered by the HCS. Diesel fuel however is
covered by the HCS and any known hazards associated with this fuel
must be reported on the material safety data sheet, including the
hazards associated with the combustion of the fuel. Vehicle
operators would not be covered while operating a motor vehicle,
however operators would be covered while performing terminal
operations.
-
Trailer trucks must be restrained/chocked during forklift dock
operations. (1998, March 4). Discusses trailer creep and
trailer pull away which have long been recognized as a problem in dock
operations. Trailers must be properly chocked to prevent movement,
If restraint systems are not used,
-
Letter concerning OSHA Instruction STD 1-11.7. (1981,
September 3). Determines that trucks and trailers may be
secured to the dock in lieu of chocks or blocks during loading or
unloading operations when using powered industrial trucks.
-
Wire rope were used as a bull wire. (1976, August 20).
Discusses Rigging Equipment for Material Handling, Wire Rope,
29 CFR 1926.251(c)(3), which states that: "Wire rope shall not be secured by
knots, except on haul back lines on scrapers." In addition, if
this wire rope is used as a bull wire, then
29 CFR 1926.251(c)(4)(iii)
requires that the eyes in bull wires shall not be formed by knots
or wire rope clips. The above standards recognize the hazard of
tying knots in wire ropes used for hoisting, lowering, or pulling
loads.
Transporting Hazardous Material
-
Clarification of systems for electronic access to MSDSs.
(1999, February 18). Provides an explanation
of the Hazard Communication Standard related to MSDSs. The mobile
worksite provision allows employees who travel between worksites
during the work shift to phone-in for hazard information. In this
situation, employees have access to the MSDSs prior to leaving the
worksite and upon returning. The telephone system, therefore, is
seen as an emergency arrangement.
-
Vehicle operations on hazardous waste sites. (1992, April 2).
Indicates that most of the responsibility for regulation of
over-the-road vehicle operations belongs to the Department of
Transportation. However, if the employer gives the truck driver
responsibility to respond to emergency spills of hazardous
substances or directs the driver to drive onto hazardous waste
sites, then the driver is covered by OSHA's Hazardous Waste
Operations and Emergency Response standard.
-
Emergency response in the trucking industry. (1991, April
3). Determines that each container of hazardous chemicals must be
labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous
chemical, an appropriate hazard warning, and the name and address
of the chemical manufacturer, importer, or other responsible
party.
-
Training requirements for drivers hauling hazardous waste.
(1991, June 7). Indicates that the training under
29 CFR
1910.120(q)(6) depends on the duties and functions to be performed
by the truck driver. If the truck driver is expected to stop
dangerous leaks and clean up the spills, then training at the
hazardous materials technician or hazardous materials specialist
level is appropriate.
- Search all available
standard interpretations.
Whistleblower Protection
Section 405 of the
Surface Transportation
Assistance Act (STAA) provides protection from reprisal by
employers for truckers and certain other employees in the trucking
industry involved in activity related to interstate commercial
motor vehicle safety and health. Secretary of Labor's Order No.
9-83 (48 FR 35736, August 5, 1983) delegated authority to the
Assistant Secretary of OSH to investigate and issue findings and
preliminary orders under Section 405. The Office of Investigative
Assistance has a
Whistleblower Program.
Employees who believe they have been discriminated against for
exercising their rights under Section 405 can file a complaint
with OSHA within 180 days of the incident. The Secretary will
investigate the complaint and, within 60 days after it was filed,
issue findings as to whether there is a reason to believe Section
405 has been violated.
If the Secretary finds that a complaint has merit, he/she also
will issue an order requiring, where appropriate, abatement of the
violation, reinstatement with back pay and related compensation,
payment of compensatory damages, and the payment of the employee's
expenses in bringing the complaint. Either the employee or
employer may object to the findings. If no objection is filed
within 30 days, the finding and order are final. If a timely filed
objection is made, however, the objecting party is entitled to a
hearing on the objection before an Administrative Law Judge of the
Department of Labor.
Within 120 days of the hearing, the Secretary will issue a final
order. A party aggrieved by the final order may seek judicial
review in a court of appeals within 60 days of the final order.
The following activities that may be performed by truckers and
certain employees involved in inter-state commercial motor vehicle
operation are protected under Section 405:
- Filing of safety or health complaints with OSHA or another
regulatory agency relating to a violation of a commercial motor
vehicle safety rule, regulation, standard, or order.
- Instituting or causing to be instituted any proceedings
relating to a violation of a commercial motor vehicle safety
rule, regulation, standard, or order.
- Testifying in any such proceedings relating to the above
items.
- Refusing to operate a vehicle when such operation
constitutes a violation of any Federal rules, regulations,
standards or orders applicable to commercial motor vehicle
safety or health; or because of the employee's reasonable
apprehension of serious injury to himself or the public due to
the unsafe condition of the equipment.
- Complaints under Section 405 are filed in the same manner as
complaints under
11(c). The filing period for Section 405 is 180
days from the alleged discrimination, rather than 30 days as
under Section
11(c).
*These files are provided for downloading. |
|
|
|