|
Disclaimer: The information contained in these
guidelines is intended for reference purposes only. It provides a
summary of information about chemicals that workers may be
exposed to in their workplaces. The information may be superseded by new developments in
the field of industrial hygiene. Readers are therefore advised to
regard these recomendations as general guidelines and to
determine whether new information is available.
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH GUIDELINE FOR WOOD DUST, WESTERN RED CEDAR
INTRODUCTION
This guideline summarizes pertinent information about western red
cedar dust for workers and employers as well as for physicians,
industrial hygienists, and other occupational safety and health
professionals who may need such information to conduct effective
occupational safety and health programs. Recommendations may be
superseded by new developments in these fields; readers are therefore
advised to regard these recommendations as general guidelines and to
determine whether new information is available.
SUBSTANCE IDENTIFICATION
* Formula
Not applicable.
* Structure
(For Structure, see paper copy)
* Synonyms
Finely divided wood particles, powdered wood, sawdust, wood
flour, softwood dust, wood dust
* Identifiers
1. CAS No.: Data not available.
2. RTECS No.: ZC9850000
3. Specific DOT number: None
4. Specific DOT label: None
* Appearance and odor
Western red cedar dust is any wood particle arising from the
processing or handling of western red cedar. This wood has a
very characteristic cedar smell.
CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
* Physical data
1. Molecular weight: Not applicable.
2. Boiling point: Not applicable.
3. Specific gravity: Not applicable.
4. Vapor density: Not applicable.
5. Melting point: Not applicable.
6. Vapor pressure: Not applicable.
7. Solubility: Not applicable.
8. Evaporation rate: Not applicable.
* Reactivity
1. Conditions contributing to instability: None reported.
2. Incompatibilities: None reported.
3. Hazardous decomposition products: None reported.
4. Special precautions: A severe explosion hazard may exist if a
wood dust cloud comes into contact with a source of ignition.
Partially burned or scorched wood dust is especially hazardous
if it is dispersed in air because of its explosivity.
* Flammability
The National Fire Protection Association has not assigned a
flammability rating to western red cedar dust. Other sources rate
western red cedar dust as a combustible solid when this substance
is exposed to heat or open flame.
1. Flash point: Not applicable.
2. Autoignition temperature: Data not available.
3. Flammable limits in air: Data not available.
4. Extinguishant: Use an extinguishant that is suitable for the
materials involved in the surrounding fire.
Fires involving western red cedar dust should be fought upwind
from the maximum distance possible. Isolate the hazard area and
deny access to unnecessary personnel. Firefighters should wear
a full set of protective clothing and self-contained breathing
apparatus when fighting fires involving western red cedar dust.
EXPOSURE LIMITS
* OSHA PEL
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has
established a permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 15 milligrams
per cubic meter (mg/m(3)) for the total dust and 5 mg/m(3) for
the respirable fraction of western red cedar dust (as a nuisance
dust).
* NIOSH REL
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
has established a recommended exposure limit (REL) for western
red cedar dust of 1 mg/m(3) of air, as a TWA for up to a 10-hour
workday and a 40-hour workweek [NIOSH 1992].
* ACGIH TLV
The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
(ACGIH) has assigned western red cedar dust (as a soft wood) a
threshold limit value (TLV) of 5 mg/m(3) as a TWA for a normal
8-hour workday and a 40-hour workweek and a short-term exposure
limit (STEL) of 10 mg/m(3) for periods not to exceed 15 minutes.
Exposures at the STEL concentration should not be repeated more
than four times a day and should be separated by intervals of at
least 60 minutes [ACGIH 1994, p. 36].
* Rationale for Limits
The NIOSH limit is based on the risk of pulmonary dysfunction
and other respiratory effects [NIOSH 1992].
The ACGIH limits are based on the apparent low risk of upper
respiratory tract effects [ACGIH 1991, p. 1729].
HEALTH HAZARD INFORMATION
* Routes of Exposure
Exposure to western red cedar dust can occur through inhalation,
ingestion, and eye or skin contact.
* Summary of toxicology
1. Effects on Animals: No information was available on the health
effects of western red cedar dust on experimental animals.
2. Effects on Humans: Exposure to western red cedar dust can result
in the development of rhinitis, dermatitis, and asthma [ACGIH
1991]. Although wood dusts have long been associated with nasal
cancer and pulmonary dysfunction, no reports in the available
literature specifically describe these conditions in relation to
exposure to western red cedar dust. It is believed that the
nasal cancer and more severe respiratory effects are associated
with exposure to dusts from the hardwoods such as beech, walnut,
and oak [ACGIH 1991].
* Signs and symptoms of exposure
1. Acute exposure: Acute exposure to western red cedar dust may
result in irritation of the eyes, skin, or respiratory tract.
2. Chronic exposure: Chronic exposure to western red cedar dust
may result in dermatitis, asthma, or respiratory system congestion.
EMERGENCY MEDICAL PROCEDURES
* Emergency medical procedures: [NIOSH to supply]
5. Rescue: Remove an incapacitated worker from further exposure
and implement appropriate emergency procedures (e.g., those
listed on the Material Safety Data Sheet required by OSHA's
Hazard Communication Standard [29 CFR 1910.1200]). All workers
should be familiar with emergency procedures, the location and
proper use of emergency equipment, and methods of protecting
themselves during rescue operations.
EXPOSURE SOURCES AND CONTROL METHODS
The following operations may involve western red cedar dust and lead
to worker exposures to this substance:
- The logging and initial processing of western red cedar wood
- The manufacture of western red cedar wood products
Methods that are effective in controlling worker exposures to western
red cedar dust, depending on the feasibility of implementation, are as
follows:
- Process enclosure
- Local exhaust ventilation
- General dilution ventilation
- Personal protective equipment
Workers responding to a release or potential release of a hazardous
substance must be protected as required by paragraph (q) of OSHA's
Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Standard [29 CFR
1910.120].
Good sources of information about control methods are as follows:
1. ACGIH [1992]. Industrial ventilation--a manual of recommended
practice. 21st ed. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of
Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
2. Burton DJ [1986]. Industrial ventilation--a self study companion.
Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists.
3. Alden JL, Kane JM [1982]. Design of industrial ventilation
systems. New York, NY: Industrial Press, Inc.
4. Wadden RA, Scheff PA [1987]. Engineering design for control of
workplace hazards. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
5. Plog BA [1988]. Fundamentals of industrial hygiene. Chicago,
IL: National Safety Council.
MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE
OSHA is currently developing requirements for medical surveillance.
When these requirements are promulgated, readers should refer to them
for additional information and to determine whether employers whose
employees are exposed to western red cedar dust are required to
implement medical surveillance procedures.
* Medical Screening
Workers who may be exposed to chemical hazards should be
monitored in a systematic program of medical surveillance that
is intended to prevent occupational injury and disease. The
program should include education of employers and workers about
work-related hazards, early detection of adverse health effects,
and referral of workers for diagnosis and treatment. The
occurrence of disease or other work-related adverse health
effects should prompt immediate evaluation of primary preventive
measures (e.g., industrial hygiene monitoring, engineering
controls, and personal protective equipment). A medical
surveillance program is intended to supplement, not replace, such
measures. To detect and control work-related health effects,
medical evaluations should be performed (1) before job
placement, (2) periodically during the term of employment, and
(3) at the time of job transfer or termination.
* Preplacement medical evaluation
Before a worker is placed in a job with a potential for exposure
to western red cedar dust, a licensed health care professional
should evaluate and document the worker's baseline health status
with thorough medical, environmental, and occupational
histories, a physical examination, and physiologic and
laboratory tests appropriate for the anticipated occupational
risks. These should concentrate on the function and integrity
of the skin and respiratory system [NIOSH 1994a]. Medical
surveillance for respiratory disease should be conducted using
the principles and methods recommended by the American Thoracic
Society.
A preplacement medical evaluation is recommended to assess
medical conditions that may be aggravated or may result in
increased risk when a worker is exposed to western red cedar
dust at or below the prescribed exposure limit. The health care
professional should consider the probable frequency, intensity,
and duration of exposure as well as the nature and degree of any
applicable medical condition. Such conditions (which should not
be regarded as absolute contraindications to job placement)
include a history and other findings consistent with diseases of
the skin or respiratory system [NIOSH 1994a].
* Periodic medical evaluations
Occupational health interviews and physical examinations should
be performed at regular intervals during the employment period,
as mandated by any applicable Federal, State, or local standard.
Where no standard exists and the hazard is minimal, evaluations
should be conducted every 3 to 5 years or as frequently as
recommended by an experienced occupational health physician.
Additional examinations may be necessary if a worker develops
symptoms attributable to western red cedar dust exposure. The
interviews, examinations, and medical screening tests should
focus on identifying the adverse effects of western red cedar
dust on the skin or respiratory system [NIOSH 1994a]. Current
health status should be compared with the baseline health status
of the individual worker or with expected values for a suitable
reference population.
* Termination medical evaluations
The medical, environmental, and occupational history interviews,
the physical examination, and selected physiologic or laboratory
tests that were conducted at the time of placement should be
repeated at the time of job transfer or termination to determine
the worker's medical status at the end of his or her employment.
Any changes in the worker's health status should be compared
with those expected for a suitable reference population.
* Biological monitoring
Biological monitoring involves sampling and analyzing body
tissues or fluids to provide an index of exposure to a toxic
substance or metabolite. No biological monitoring test
acceptable for routine use has yet been developed for western
red cedar dust.
WORKPLACE MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT
Determination of a worker's exposure to airborne western red cedar
dust is made using a tared low ash polyvinyl chloride filter (5
microns) preceded for respirable fraction sampling by a 10 mm nylon
cyclone. Samples are collected at a maximum flow rate of 1.7
liters/minute (respirable fraction) or 2.0 liters/minute (total dust)
until a maximum collection volume of 816 liters (respirable fraction)
or 960 liters (total dust) is reached. Analysis is conducted by
gravimetric methods. This method (for nuisance dusts) is described
in the OSHA Computerized Information System [OSHA 1994] and is fully
validated. NIOSH has published a similar method (Method No. 0500)
for the sampling and analysis of nuisance dusts [NIOSH 1994b].
PERSONAL HYGIENE PROCEDURES
If western red cedar dust contacts the skin, workers should flush the
affected areas with plenty of water, followed by washing with soap
and water.
Clothing contaminated with western red cedar dust should be removed
when convenient, and provisions should be made for the safe removal
of the dust from the clothing. Persons laundering the clothes should
be informed of the hazardous properties of western red cedar dust.
A worker who handles western red cedar dust should thoroughly wash
hands, forearms, and face with soap and water before eating, using
tobacco products, using toilet facilities, applying cosmetics, or
taking medication.
Workers should not eat, drink, use tobacco products, apply cosmetics,
or take medication in areas where western red cedar dust is
generated.
STORAGE
Western red cedar dust should be stored in a cool, dry,
well-ventilated area in tightly sealed containers that are labeled in
accordance with OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard [29 CFR
1910.1200]. Containers of western red cedar dust should be protected
from physical damage and should be stored separately from all sources
of ignition.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements for emergency
planning, reportable quantities of hazardous releases, community
right-to-know, and hazardous waste management may change over time.
Users are therefore advised to determine periodically whether new
information is available.
* Emergency planning requirements
Western red cedar dust is not subject to EPA emergency planning
requirements under the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
Act (SARA) (Title III) in 42 USC 11022.
* Reportable quantity requirements for hazardous releases
A hazardous substance release is defined by EPA as any spilling,
leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging,
injecting, escaping, leaching, dumping, or disposing into the
environment (including the abandonment or discarding of
contaminated containers) of hazardous substances. In the event
of a release that is above the reportable quantity for that
chemical, employers are required to notify the proper Federal,
State, and local authorities [40 CFR 355.40].
Employers are not required by the emergency release notification
provisions in 40 CFR Part 355.40 to notify the National Response
Center of an accidental release of western red cedar dust; there
is no reportable quantity for this substance.
* Community right-to-know requirements
Employers are not required by EPA in 40 CFR Part 372.30 to
submit a Toxic Chemical Release Inventory form (Form R) to EPA
reporting the amount of western red cedar dust emitted or
released from their facility annually.
* Hazardous waste management requirements
EPA considers a waste to be hazardous if it exhibits any of the
following characteristics: ignitability, corrosivity,
reactivity, or toxicity as defined in 40 CFR 261.21-261.24.
Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) [40 USC
6901 et seq.], EPA has specifically listed many chemical wastes
as hazardous. Although western red cedar dust is not
specifically listed as a hazardous waste under RCRA, EPA
requires employers to treat waste as hazardous if it exhibits
any of the characteristics discussed above.
Providing detailed information about the removal and disposal of
specific chemicals is beyond the scope of this guideline. The
U.S. Department of Transportation, EPA, and State and local
regulations should be followed to ensure that removal,
transport, and disposal of this substance are conducted in
accordance with existing regulations. To be certain that
chemical waste disposal meets EPA regulatory requirements,
employers should address any questions to the RCRA hotline at
(703) 412-9810 (in the Washington, D.C. area) or toll-free at
(800) 424-9346 (outside Washington, D.C.). In addition, relevant
State and local authorities should be contacted for information on
any requirements they may have for the waste removal and
disposal of this substance.
RESPIRATORY PROTECTION
* Conditions for respirator use
Good industrial hygiene practice requires that engineering
controls be used where feasible to reduce workplace
concentrations of hazardous materials to the prescribed exposure
limit. However, some situations may require the use of
respirators to control exposure. Respirators must be worn if
the ambient concentration of western red cedar dust exceeds
prescribed exposure limits. Respirators may be used (1) before
engineering controls have been installed, (2) during work
operations such as maintenance or repair activities that involve
unknown exposures, (3) during operations that require entry into
tanks or closed vessels, and (4) during emergencies. Workers
should only use respirators that have been approved by NIOSH and
the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA).
* Respiratory protection program
Employers should institute a complete respiratory protection
program that, at a minimum, complies with the requirements of
OSHA's Respiratory Protection Standard [29 CFR 1910.134]. Such
a program must include respirator selection, an evaluation of
the worker's ability to perform the work while wearing a
respirator, the regular training of personnel, respirator fit
testing, periodic workplace monitoring, and regular respirator
maintenance, inspection, and cleaning. The implementation of an
adequate respiratory protection program (including selection of
the correct respirator) requires that a knowledgeable person be
in charge of the program and that the program be evaluated
regularly. For additional information on the selection and use
of respirators and on the medical screening of respirator users,
consult the latest edition of the NIOSH Respirator Decision
Logic [NIOSH 1987b] and the NIOSH Guide to Industrial
Respiratory Protection [NIOSH 1987a].
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
Workers should use appropriate personal protective clothing and
equipment that must be carefully selected, used, and maintained to be
effective in preventing skin contact with western red cedar dust.
The selection of the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE)
(e.g., gloves, sleeves, encapsulating suits) should be based on the
extent of the worker's potential exposure to western red cedar dust.
To evaluate the use of PPE materials with western red cedar dust,
users should consult the best available performance data and
manufacturers' recommendations. Significant differences have been
demonstrated in the chemical resistance of generically similar PPE
materials (e.g., butyl) produced by different manufacturers. In
addition, the chemical resistance of a mixture may be significantly
different from that of any of its neat components.
Any chemical-resistant clothing that is used should be periodically
evaluated to determine its effectiveness in preventing dermal
contact. Safety showers and eye wash stations should be located close
to operations that involve western red cedar dust.
Splash-proof chemical safety goggles or face shields (20 to 30 cm
long, minimum) should be worn during any operation in which a
solvent, caustic, or other toxic substance may be splashed into the
eyes.
In addition to the possible need for wearing protective outer apparel
(e.g., aprons, encapsulating suits), workers should wear work
uniforms, coveralls, or similar full-body coverings that are
laundered each day. Employers should provide lockers or other closed
areas to store work and street clothing separately. Employers should
collect work clothing at the end of each work shift and provide for
its laundering. Laundry personnel should be informed about the
potential hazards of handling contaminated clothing and instructed
about measures to minimize their health risk.
Protective clothing should be kept free of oil and grease and should
be inspected and maintained regularly to preserve its effectiveness.
Protective clothing may interfere with the body's heat dissipation,
especially during hot weather or during work in hot or poorly
ventilated work environments.
REFERENCES
ACGIH [1991]. Documentation of the threshold limit values and
biological exposure indices. 6th ed. Cincinnati, OH: American
Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
ACGIH [1994]. 1994-1995 Threshold limit values for chemical
substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices.
Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists.
ATS [1987]. Standardization of spirometry -- 1987 update. American
Thoracic Society. Am Rev Respir Dis 136:1285-1296.
CFR. Code of Federal regulations. Washington, DC: U.S. Government
Printing Office, Office of the Federal Register.
Genium [1987]. Material safety data sheet No. 376. Schenectady, NY:
Genium Publishing Corporation.
Lewis RJ, ed. [1993]. Hawley's condensed chemical dictionary. 12th
ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Mickelsen RL, Hall RC [1987]. A breakthrough time comparison of
nitrile and neoprene glove materials produced by different glove
manufacturers. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 48(11): 941-947.
Mickelsen RL, Hall RC, Chern RT, Myers JR [1991]. Evaluation of a
simple weight-loss method for determining the permeation of organic
liquids through rubber films. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 52(10):
445-447.
NIOSH [1987a]. NIOSH guide to industrial respiratory protection.
Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public
Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 87-116.
NIOSH [1987b]. NIOSH respirator decision logic. Cincinnati, OH:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service,
Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 87-108.
NIOSH [1989]. Registry of toxic effects of chemical substances:
Western red cedar dust. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease
Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
Division of Standards Development and Technology Transfer, Technical
Information Branch.
NIOSH [1992]. Recommendations for occupational safety and health:
Compendium of policy documents and statements. Cincinnati, OH: U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service,
Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 92-100.
NIOSH [1994a]. NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards. Cincinnati,
OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health
Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94-116.
NIOSH [1994b]. NIOSH manual of analytical methods. 4th ed.
Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public
Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94-113.
OSHA [1994]. Computerized information system. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
USC. United States code. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing
Office.
|