Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents|
| Standard Number:||1926.451(g); 1926.453(b)(2)(v); 1926.502(d)|
February 18, 1999
Mr. Steven D. Claypool
15516 Budge St.
San Leandro, CA 94579
RE: 1926.451(g), 1926.453, 1926.502(d);
Dear Mr. Claypool:
This is in response to your letter dated July 31, 1998 to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), in which you express concern over the use of personal fall arrest systems to protect employees when working from aerial lifts. Your specific concern is that aerial lifts may tip over from the arresting forces generated when a worker falls while wearing a personal fall arrest system.
A provision in OSHA's aerial lift standard for construction, §1926.453(b)(2)(v), requires fall protection for employees in aerial lifts. An employer can comply with that requirement by using either a restraint system or a personal fall arrest system. A restraint system consists of a body belt or harness, lanyard and anchor. The system is arranged so that the worker is prevented from falling any distance.
A system that exposes a worker to a fall, but stops the fall within
specified parameters, is a personal fall arrest system. The criteria for
fall arrest systems are in 29 C.F.R. §1926, subpart M. Section
1926.502(d)(15) provides that "anchorages used for attachment of personal
fall arrest equipment shall be . . . capable of supporting at least
When using a personal fall arrest system, that system must not be anchored to an aerial lift unless the aerial lift is capable of withstanding the loads imposed by an arrested fall. Under §1926.502(d)(16)(iii), the maximum distance a worker is allowed to fall is 6 feet. Some aerial lifts may not be designed to withstand the impact of a 6 foot arrested fall. However, if the fall arrest system is set up to limit the fall to less than 6 feet, the impact forces will be lessened (the strength requirements for the anchorage are met as long as it has a safety factor of two). That may bring the arresting forces within the capabilities of some of those aerial lifts. If this cannot be achieved, then a restraint system must be used. Note that if a restraint system is used, there is no need to provide for prompt rescue under §1926.502(d)(20), since there would not be an arrested fall.
You ask if we are aware of any studies where the capability of aerial equipment to withstand the forces of arrested falls were tested; we are not aware of any such tests. You also ask if there is a procedure for petitioning for an amendment to the standard to address this problem. You may send a request to us asking that a particular change in a standard be placed on OSHA's Regulatory Agenda. We are currently preparing an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on a variety of fall protection issues.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us again by writing to: USDOL-OSHA, Directorate of Construction, Office of Construction Standards, Room N3621, 200 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20210.
Russell B. Swanson, Director
Directorate of Construction
|Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents|
The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.