Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents|
| Standard Number:||1926.500; 1926.501; 1926.502; 1926.503|
August 28, 1995
Mr. J. Nigel Ellis
Dynamic Scientific Controls
P.O. Box 445
Wilmington, Delaware 19899-0445
Dear Mr. Ellis:
This is in response to your letter of April 4 to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in which you expressed your concerns with Appendix C, Paragraph 1.(b)(3), in the 29 CFR 1926.500-503 fall protection standards, which states that the frequency response of the load measuring system when testing fall arrest equipment should be set at 500 Hz.
We agree that 100 Hz is more appropriate and would be consistent with other current American (ANSI Z359.1-1192) and Canadian (CSA Z259.11-M92) standards. Since Appendix C of the fall protection standards is a non-mandatory appendix, no citations will be issued if 100 Hz is used instead of 500 Hz for the frequency response of the load measuring system when testing fall arrest equipment.
We have provided our standards-setting personnel with a copy of your letter for possible adjustment of the appendix.
If you have any questions, please call me or Dale Cavanaugh of my staff at (202)219-8136.
Roy F. Gurnham, P.E., J.D.
Office of Construction and Maritime
|Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents|
The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.