Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents|
February 25, 1994
MEMORANDUM FOR: JOHN B. MILES, JR. REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR THROUGH: H. BERRIEN ZETTLER, DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS FROM: ROY F. GURNHAM, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF CONSTRUCTION AND MARITIME COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE SUBJECT: Capping of Rebar to Prevent Impalement (OSHA 2202)This is in response to your memorandum concerning the statement in the Construction Industry Digest (OSHA publication 2202) addressing the use of plastic caps on protruding reinforcing steel to eliminate the hazard of impalement.
The little plastic caps refered to in the Construction Industry Digest as not preventing impalement are the type used to cap pipe or conduit and not the larger mushroom type caps commonly accepted by OSHA as impalement protection. The small caps have never been recognized as appropriate impalement protection and this policy has not changed.
We agree that the admonition in the Digest is confusing and we will work to correct the statement in future publications. For your information, the California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board recently published standards addressing reinforcing steel guarding (copy enclosed). Rebar guarded in accordance with Section 1712 of the California Code of Regulations should be deemed to be in compliance with 1926.701(b).
If you have any further questions please contact me or Dale Cavanaugh of my
staff at (202) 219-8136.
|Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents|
The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.