Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents|
| Standard Number:||1904|
June 21, 1993
Mr. Neil H. Wasser
Constangy, Brooks & Smith
230 Peachtree Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1557
Dear Mr. Wasser:
Thank you for your letter dated June 2, requesting interpretations on several OSHA injury and illness recordkeeping issues. I will respond by first restating your question and then answering it. Whenever possible, I will reference the Recordkeeping Guidelines for Occupational Injuries and Illnesses by citing the appropriate page and Q&A numbers.
Q1 Part 1904.2 of the Code of Federal regulations (CFR) provides, in pertinent part, that an employer may maintain the OSHA 200 Log by means of data-processing equipment if at each establishment "there is available a copy of the log which reflects separately the injury and illness experience of that establishment complete and current to a date 45 calendar days." (Emphasis added).
As you know, many companies now maintain their OSHA 200 Log on computers located at each establishment. Will OSHA consider the Logs to be sufficiently "available" if they can be produced by simply entering a print command into the computer whenever a request is made to review the Log, or must the establishment have an actual hard copy of the Log on hand at all times?
A1 If the establishment is capable of printing the Log immediately upon request, it will be considered to be within compliance of 29 CFR 1904.2.
Q2 Assume that an employee incurs a work related injury that is recordable as a result of "medical treatment." Assume further that the employee is required to periodically visit the treating physician for follow-up observation and/or treatment. If the employee is involved in an automobile accident resulting in medical treatment and/or lost workdays while driving to the doctor, are the injuries resulting from the automobile accident "work related" for OSHA recordkeeping purposes? Does it make any difference if the employee is leaving for the doctor's appointment from home versus from work?
A2 The scenario outlined above would not be considered work related. Additional injury or illness that results from direct consequences of a previous work related case (without additional workplace events or exposures) should be attributed to the original case (page 45, Q&A F-17). This includes situations such as adverse reactions to medications, time lost due to case related elective surgery, or complications during surgery, etc. On the other hand, additional injury or illness sustained from circumstances which are secondary to the original case (such as driving the car in the above scenario) is not considered work related and therefore should not be attributed to the original case.
I hope you find this information helpful. If you have any further questions, please contact my staff at Area Code (202) 219-6463.
Stephen A. Newell
Office of Statistics
|Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents|
The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.