Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents|
| Standard Number:||1904|
October 19, 1992
Darryl S. Addington, M.D.
Eastman Chemical Company
Post Office Box 1975
Kingsport, Tennessee 37662
Dear Dr. Addington:
Thank you for your letters dated October 7 and 9 requesting interpretations for several injury and illness recordkeeping issues. I will address each issue separately, and when possible, cite the enclosed Recordkeeping Guidelines for Occupational Injuries and Illnesses.
If a worker is exposed to noise levels in excess of an 85 dB 8-hour time-weighted average, as found in the hearing conservation standard, any hearing loss is presumed to be work related. This presumption may be rebutted only with medical evidence that shows the entire shift in hearing was caused by non-occupational factors. A physician's written opinion stating that the loss was not caused, contributed to, or aggravated by the work environment is required. Documentation of the employee wearing proper hearing protection at all times in the high noise areas would not be enough to rebut the presumption. It must be shown that the shift was totally due to non-work factors.
A company that records a work related Standard Threshold Shift (STS) (defined as 10 dB or higher) would be in complete compliance with the injury and illness recordkeeping requirements. However, for federal enforcement purposes, a company will only be cited for not recording a cumulative shift of 25 dB or greater.
Non-pinhead work related second degree burns and all occupational third degree burns are recordable, regardless of the type of treatment given. As found on page 42 of the Guidelines, a non- minor injury is one that results in damage to the physical structure of a nonsuperficial nature. Second degree burns which are larger than a pinhead and all third degree burns are considered nonsuperficial for recordkeeping purposes. All work related non-minor injuries must be recorded.
The general rule is that all injuries and illnesses that occur to employees on the employer's premises are presumed to be work related. If an employee falls within the work environment, whether caused by a non-work related preexisting condition or not, any resulting injury from the fall would be considered work related. If the injury requires medical treatment, as per your example, the case would be recordable. Please see Q&A B-14 on page 31 and Q&A C-7 on page 34 of the Guidelines.
I hope you find this information useful. If you have any further questions, please contact my staff at Area Code (202) 219-6463.
Stephen A. Newell
Office of Statistics
October 7, 1992
Mr. Dave Schmidt
U.S. Department of Labor
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20210
Dear Mr. Schmidt:
Thank you for the fax and your help. Please give me an answer to the following cases.
1. Second or third degree burns - are they recordable by diagnosis alone or does medical treatment have to be rendered? If medical treatment is necessary, what constitutes medical treatment? Application of an antiseptic or antibiotic? Application of dressing? Does size of the burn make a difference?
2. An employee has a seizure; coughs and falls; has a hypoglycemic problem and falls; slips for no reason and sustains a laceration requiring sutures. Is this recordable?
Darryl S. Addington, M.D.
|Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents|