Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents|
| Standard Number:||1910.147|
March 3, 1992
MEMORANDUM FOR: JOHN T. PHILLIPS REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR FROM: PATRICIA K. CLARK, DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS SUBJECT: Request for Concurrence with an Interpretation of 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii) - Lockout DevicesThis is in response to your memorandum of April 19, 1991 asking if the use of a lock, which had been assigned to an authorized employee for use as a lockout device, and was also being used to lock tool boxes, was a violation of the standard. Please accept our apologies for the extreme delay in responding.
The answer is yes. It is a violation of the standard to use a lockout device for other purposes. If the lock is intended for use as a lockout device under the standard, but is also being used to lock tool boxes, then this is a violation of 1910.147(c)(5)(ii). This confirms a conversation on June 11, 1991 between Jeff Finch, formally of our staff, and Jonas Miniatas of your Office of Technical Support.
We hope this helps to clarify your concerns.
|Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents|
The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.