Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents|
| Standard Number:||1926.500(d)(1)|
|MEMORANDUM FOR:||JAMES W. STANLEY|
REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR, II
|FROM:||PATRICIA K. CLARK, DIRECTOR |
DIRECTORATE OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS
|SUBJECT:||Review Commission Decisions|
This Commission reversed the ALJ's decision, affirming a serious and repeated violation of 1926.500(d)(1) with a penalty of $800. The greater hazard defense was knocked down because the company failed to prove all three elements.
The Commission made the order conditional to give the employer time to prepare arguments addressing the characterization of the violation and assessed penalty.
|Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents|
The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.