Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents
• Standard Number: 1926.500(d)(1)
• Status: Archived

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.


June 18, 1991

MEMORANDUM FOR: JAMES W. STANLEY
REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR, II

FROM: PATRICIA K. CLARK, DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS

SUBJECT: Review Commission Decisions


The following Review Commission Decision(s) are being forwarded to you for your information and reference should further legal action result.

Spancrete Northeast, Inc., Docket No. 86-521
This Commission reversed the ALJ's decision, affirming a serious and repeated violation of 1926.500(d)(1) with a penalty of $800. The greater hazard defense was knocked down because the company failed to prove all three elements.

The Commission made the order conditional to give the employer time to prepare arguments addressing the characterization of the violation and assessed penalty.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.


Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents