Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents|
| Standard Number:||1910.1200|
January 19, 1989
Mr. Paul W. Davis
Western Suppliers Association
Suite 204 1777 Borel Place
San Mateo, California 94402
Dear Mr. Davis:
This is in response to your letter of November 8, 1988, regarding the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) Hazard Communication Standard (HCS). Please accept my apology for the delay in response.
The HCS requires distributors to ensure that material safety data sheets (MSDS) and updated information are provided to other distributors and employers. The standard requires distributors to provide MSDS with the first shipment of hazardous chemicals to employers after September 23, 1987. Non-manufacturing employers were to be in compliance with all provisions of the standard, including having a MSDS for each hazardous chemical they use by May 23, 1988. OSHA extended the enforcement date, however, to August 1, 1988, as a result of a United States Court of Appeals decision which was unclear as to the extent of a granted stay of enforcement of the HCS. The court eventually clarified the application of the stay of enforcement only to the construction industry. Distributors were not obligated to provide MSDS during the stay. With the lifting of the stay distributors were again required to provide MSDS with next shipment of hazardous chemicals to employers on or after August 1, 1988, if a material safety data sheet had not previously been sent.
The HCS does not prohibit distributors for asking their customers to pay for the cost of providing MSDS. The standard states that distributor shall ensure that material safety data sheets are provided to other distributors and employers. However, a distributor cannot break the established link between the requirement to provide A MSDS and the shipment of a hazardous chemical. Distributors that have shipped hazardous chemicals to downstream employers, therefore, are required to have provided the employer a MSDS. Failure of a distributor to send MSDS for hazardous chemicals previously shipped to downstream employers would result in a citation for non-compliance and abatement would require the distributor to provide the MSDS to the customers at no cost. As a result, it is the Agency's interpretation that distributors cannot charge their customers for MSDS for hazardous chemicals previously shipped. If a hazardous chemical has not yet been shipped the standard does not prohibit a distributor from charging a customer for the MSDS.
If we can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact us again.
Thomas J. Shepich, Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs
|Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents|
The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.