US Dept of Labor

Occupational Safety & Health AdministrationWe Can Help

Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents
• Standard Number: 1910.1200

August 18, 1986

Paul W. Willard, Ph.D.
Manager, Product Regulatory
Toxicology
3M Center
St. Paul, Minnesota 55144

Dear Dr. Willard:

This is in response to your letter of June 25 concerning the requirements for listing multiple exposure limits on material safety data sheets under the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) Hazard Communication Standard (HCS).

It is the intent of the standard that employees and manufacturing users have a fundamental right to know the existing exposure limits of the substances with which they work. OSHA therefore encourages chemical manufacturers and importers to disclose all known exposure limits on the material safety data sheets.

From a compliance standpoint the material safety data sheet must contain the OSHA permissible exposure limit (PEL), and any more protective exposure limit, if one or more exists. Failure to include a less protective exposure limit, other than the OSHA PEL, will be considered a de minimis violation and will not result in the issuance of a citation.

Please feel free to contact us again if further assistance is needed.

Sincerely,



John B. Miles, Jr., Director
Directorate of Field Operations




June 25, 1986

Mr. John Miles
U.S. Department of Labor
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20210

Re: MSDS - Exposure Limits

Dear Mr. Miles:

At 3M we have established a policy of placing the most conservative exposure limit and the source, i.e. ACGIH, OSHA, on the Material Safety Data Sheet. We do not customarily list all TLVs, PELs, etc. We believe this practice is prudent, since it is not confusing to those reading the MSDS and does not cloud the primary objective of clear, effective hazard communication and well-founded precautionary information. In addition, this is good practice for averting liability claims.

I understand from Mr. Gibbs that OSHA Region 5 has already adopted this policy. We would like to see acceptance of this policy in all OSHA regions. We are requesting concurrence from Federal OSHA that we are required to designate only one exposure limit which will be the most conservative.

Sincerely,



Paul W. Willard, Ph.D.
Manager, Product Regulatory Toxicology
Diplomat of the American Board of Toxicology


Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close