Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents|
| Standard Number:||1926.500|
July 28, 1981
Mr. A. J. Weaver
Miller & Long Co., Inc.
4824 Rugby Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20014
Dear Mr. Weaver:
This is in response to your letter of July 15, 1981, concerning perimeter protection at building slab edges. Your letter addressed to Mr. James Concannon was forwarded to this office for response.
Normally steel bands are not acceptable as top rails or intermediate rails of a guardrail system because the edges of the band constitute a potential hazard to hands and other portions of the body exposed to the bands. However, steel bands well flagged for easy identification with sufficient strength to meet design criteria in 29 CFR 1926.500(f)(1)(vi)(a)(b)(c) and (d) and with the edges protected could be used as guardrails. In addition, your system will be maintained by regularly inspecting the metal banding and replacing any that exhibit rust, corrosion, or deflects more than three inches when two hundred pounds pressure or less is applied to it.
Your request for a variance for the above method of perimeter protection is unnecessary because your guardrail system, as described, using steel banding would comply with the 29 CFR 1926.500(f)(1)(vi).
If I may be of further assistance, please feel free to call or write.
John K. Barto Chief,
Division of Occupational Safety Programming
|Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents|
The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.