Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents
• Standard Number: 1926.500
• Status: Archived

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

July 28, 1981

Mr. A. J. Weaver
Safety Director
Miller & Long Co., Inc.
Concrete Construction
4824 Rugby Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20014

Dear Mr. Weaver:

This is in response to your letter of July 15, 1981, concerning perimeter protection at building slab edges. Your letter addressed to Mr. James Concannon was forwarded to this office for response.

Normally steel bands are not acceptable as top rails or intermediate rails of a guardrail system because the edges of the band constitute a potential hazard to hands and other portions of the body exposed to the bands. However, steel bands well flagged for easy identification with sufficient strength to meet design criteria in 29 CFR 1926.500(f)(1)(vi)(a)(b)(c) and (d) and with the edges protected could be used as guardrails. In addition, your system will be maintained by regularly inspecting the metal banding and replacing any that exhibit rust, corrosion, or deflects more than three inches when two hundred pounds pressure or less is applied to it.

Your request for a variance for the above method of perimeter protection is unnecessary because your guardrail system, as described, using steel banding would comply with the 29 CFR 1926.500(f)(1)(vi).

If I may be of further assistance, please feel free to call or write.

Sincerely,



John K. Barto Chief,
Division of Occupational Safety Programming


Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.


Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents