Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents|
| Standard Number:||1910.309|
December 3, 1979
MEMORANDUM FOR: CURTIS A. FOSTER REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR THRU: ROGER CLARK Field Coordinator FROM: GROVER C. WRENN Director, Federal Compliance and State Programs SUBJECT: National Electrical Code Interpretation
As you indicated in your July 27, 1979 memorandum, the National Electrical Code provides the requirements for a Class I, Division II area, but gives no specific criteria as far as distance is concerned, as to where a Class I, Division II area stops. Article 500-4(b) of the National Electrical Code provides the necessary criteria for properly evaluating a Class I, Division II location. It is not practical or possible for this office to replace the performance requirements with specification type (dimensional) requirements in regard to the distance that should be used on the ground level of a refinery in calculating where a Class I, Division II, area stops and where the nonclassified area begins. The complex variables involved in both cases does not permit the approach you have suggested. Compliance officers will have to use professional judgment and the performance standards to assess hazardous location requirements on a case by case basis.
|Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents|
The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.