Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents|
| Standard Number:||1910.212(a)(3)(vi)(f)|
August 12, 1975
Mr. Arthur L. Herold
Webster, Kilcullen and Chamberlain
1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
Dear Mr. Herold:
This is in response to your letter of April 17, 1975, requesting an interpretation of 29 CFR 1910.212(a) with the regard to the application of that paragraph to chain saws. In addition, this letter confirms the phone call of a member of my staff, Mr. Jeff Campbell, apologizing for the loss of the file, thus causing a delay in our answer.
The source standard for 29 CFR 1910.212 is established in Federal Standard 41 CFR 50-204.5. The intent of Part 50-204.5 Machine Guarding is to apply all machines. This is substantiated by the list of machines in 50-204.5(c)(4) or 1910.212(a)(3)(iv).
There is no specific Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standard that covers the guarding of chain saws. In this situation, according to 29 CFR 1910.5, the general industry standard 29 CFR 1910.212 would apply.
When a chain blade guard would prevent an employee from using the chain saw for the particular work function assigned or the blade guard presents a hazard itself, a chain blade guard would not be required. The omission of a chain blade guard under these conditions would not be a violation of 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii).
In certain intended uses, it would be feasible to have the saw blade guarded. For example, a one direction movement of the saw with no other obstructions to the guard, in which the operation exposes an employee to injury, would require that a saw blade be guarded. Otherwise, an apparent violation of 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii) would exist.
This interpretation does not exempt the use of protective equipment or of applying other applicable standards.
If I may be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me.
Barry J. White
Secretary for Regional Programs
|Standard Interpretations - (Archived) Table of Contents|