US Dept of Labor

Occupational Safety & Health AdministrationWe Can Help


Hazard

Worker was exposed to the hazard of being struck by a moving railcar on a terminal.

Process

Stacking containers on a string of railcars.

Activity at time of incident:

A longshore worker was placing locking cones into container corners prior to a top loader setting a second container on top of the existing container in a line of "double stacked" railcars in the yard.

Incident Description

Setting:

In this On-Dock-Rail operation, a longshore worker was placing locking cones on the top four corners of each lower container on a rail gondola car. A top loader would then stow a second container on the railcar. The worker would then lock the cones and move to the next railcar. The rail crew was working on Track 4 and the adjacent Track 3 was inactive. Electrical power was energized throughout the yard and engines were working a nearby facility, but the worker and rail crew did not anticipate any railcar movement on Tracks 3 or 4.

Incident:

While working on Track 4, a worker ran out of locking cones. He climbed on top of the adjacent string of railcars on Track 3 to get additional locking cones to continue his work on Track 4. Unknown to the worker and rail crew, a switch had been incorrectly thrown which caused the locomotive engine to proceed down Track 3. As the worker was gathering the cones from a railcar on Track 3, the railcars were struck by the incorrectly routed engine. The worker was knocked down between two railcars and he was run over and killed.

Relevant Factors:

  • There was a lack of communication between the terminal, operation supervisors, and workers.
  • There were no signs or signals to warn workers of possible movement of railcars within the yard.
  • There were no mechanical means of preventing railcar movement on certain tracks.
Applicable Standards and Control Measures
  • 29 CFR 1917.17(d): Railcars shall be chocked or otherwise prevented from moving.
Other Relevant Standards and/or Control Measures

These hazards could have been prevented if the driver:

  • Ensuring that the supervisor communicates with the driver and provides confirmation to enter the terminal (before a train enters a terminal facility).
  • Ensuring that supervisors communicate to workers that rail movements were taking place in the yard and making sure that the operation and safety instructions were confirmed.
  • Providing suitable warning signs or other protective means to protect workers from stepping in front of moving railcars or trains.
  • Ensuring that supervisors give safety talks at the beginning of each shift. Topics should have included: layout of yard, projected rail activity, and individual responsibilities.
  • Locking out switches to ensure that locomotives would follow the intended track routing.

This type of incident was the basis for locking out switches.

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor’s Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close