US Dept of Labor

Occupational Safety & Health AdministrationWe Can Help

Investigation of the December 19, 2008 Collapse of Atlanta Botanical Garden Canopy Walkway During Construction in Atlanta, GA

Attachment A Lab Report


May 29, 2009

Mr. Benjamin Ross

Assistant Regional Administrator for Enforcement Programs

U.S. Department of Labor - OSHA

Atlanta Regional Office

61 Forsyth Street SW, Room 6T50

Phone: 404-562-2300

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Email: Ross.Benjamin@dol.gov

Subject:

Report for Material Testing Services

W10 and W8 Steel shoring beams

Atlanta Botanical Gardens Incident

Atlanta, Georgia

TEC Services Project No. TEC 09-0429.01

Dear Ross:

Testing, Engineering, and Consulting Services Inc. (TEC Services Inc.) is pleased to submit this report of our materials testing performed for the subject project. The purpose of our work was to perform chemical and physical materials testing of select shoring beams to determine yield and ultimate strength of the steel for compliance with ASTM A36 and /or ASTM A992 specifications. This report briefly presents background information and the results of our materials testing. Our services were performed in accordance with our OSHA contract.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

TEC Services was contacted by Michael Shea of OSHA regarding the subject project. We understand that OSHA requests materials testing of selected W8 and W10 steel beams that were used as shoring beams for the subject project. We understand that these beams were removed from the project site after a collapse during a concrete pour.

TEC Services was original contacted by Hardin representatives to perform selected testing. However, it was decided by the project team for TEC Services to perform the materials testing directly for OSHA. In an e-mail on April 17, 2009, Mr. Shea and Mr. Mohammad Ayub of OSHA requested a specific scope of materials testing be performed on 6 selected beams. The purpose of this testing is to determine if the steel materials satisfy the ASTM A36 and/or ASTM A992 specification.

FIELD OBSERVATIONS

On May 5, 2009 Mr. Philip Bender of TEC Services met with Mr. Marvin Sasser (Hardin Construction) and Mr. Americo Pagan (OSHA) at the Powder Springs warehouse to perform field measurements and obtain approximate 3 foot long samples from the six selected W8 and W10 beams. Field measurements of the selected beams were performed near the ends and middle of each member. Beam depth and flange width were obtained by steel rule and web and flange thickness measurements were obtained by ultrasonic thickness gauge. Field measurements were compared to AISC published values and ASTM A6-04. Some flange thickness dimensions were as much as 10% less than AISC published values. Our filed dimensions are included in Table 1 attached.

Six approximate 3 foot long beam samples were removed and returned to Lawrenceville, Georgia laboratory for further testing. Samples for testing were removed from beams labeled 6SX02, 6SX03, 6SX09, 7SX08, 7SX09, and 8SX03. A gas powered cut off saw was used to remove the samples from one end of each beam. Mr. Bender brought beam samples to the TEC Services Laboratory for testing.

LABORATORY MATERIALS TESTING

Select material properties were tested and compared to ASTM specifications to determine the grade of steel used in the six selected W8 and W10 shoring beams. TEC Services performed tensile testing of the specimens to determine yield strength, ultimate strength and elongation of the material in substantial compliance with ASTM A370-05. IMR Test Labs performed chemical testing in accordance with ASTM A36-08. Per request, TEC Services also reviewed the results of the chemical testing and compared them to the chemical requirements for ASTM A992-06. The IMR Test Labs cover letter with chemical analysis test results is included as an attachment to this report.

The results of the chemical testing indicate the shoring beams tested (6SX02, 6SX03, 6SX09, 7SX08, 7SX09, and 8SX03) meet the requirements of ASTM A36 and ASTM A992 steel. The results of the physical tensile testing indicate the material meets the requirements of ASTM A36 steel (minimum yield strength of 36 ksi, ultimate strength 58 ksi to 80 ksi, and minimum elongation of 21%). Two of the six beams tested (6SX03 and 8SX03) do not meet the physical requirements of ASTM A992 steel (yield 50 ksi to 65 ksi, minimum ultimate testing strength of 65 ksi, and minimum elongation of 21%.) A summary of our physical testing results is included in Table 2 attached.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our physical and materials testing, the provided beams meet the requirements of ASTM A36 steel. Four of the six beams tested also meet the requirements of ASTM A992 steel (6SX02-W10x19, 6SX09-W10x12, 7SX08-W8x10, and 7SX09-W10x19). Two of the six beams tested do not meet the requirements of ASTM A992 (6SX03-W10x12 and , 8SX03-W8x10). Some section flange thickness measurements were less than AISC published dimensions.

We appreciated the opportunity to provide our professional services to you and the management team on this important project. Should questions arise concerning this proposal or if we may be of further service please contact us at 770-995-8000.

Sincerely,

TESTING, ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.

Signature on file

 

Philip J. Bender

Project Engineer

Signature on file

 

Kurt W. Heinrichs, P.E.

Principal Engineer

GA Registration No. 18741

Attachments

Table 1. Beam Measurements with Nominal Designation

Table 2. Summary of Physical Test Results

IMR Cover Letter with Chemical Analysis Results

Instron Stress vs. Strain Curves

IMR Logo

IMR Logo

IMR Test Labs - Charleston

4500 Leeds Avenue, Suite 306, Deck 70

Charleston, SC 29405

 

Phone 843.740.2901 Fax 843.745.1165

Email imr@imrcharleston.com

PO Number

2009110

Date Received

May 7, 2009

Description

I-Beam Samples

TEC Project # 09-0429

Sample ID

6SX02 A

6SX03 A

6SX09 A

7SX08 A

7SX09 A

8SX03 A

Material

Carbon Structural Steel

Specifications

ASTM A36-08

TEST REPORT

IMR Report Number 90470

 

 

 

SUMMARY

Six samples measuring approximately 1.5" by 2.5" - 3" and labeled by the client were received for chemical composition analysis. Figure 1 shows the samples as received.

The samples meet the chemical composition requirements of ASTM A36-08 for all structural steel shapes.

Results are provided on the follow page(s).

Reviewed by

Signature on file

Michael Carroll

Metallurgist

Reviewed by

Signature on file

Wil Barwick

Lead Analytical Chemist

All procedures were performed in accordance with the IMR Quality Manual, current revision, and related procedures. The information contained in this test report represents only the material tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of IMR Test Labs. IMR Test Labs - Charleston maintains a quality system in compliance with the ISO/IEC 17025 and is accredited by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA), certificates #740.01 and #740.02. IMR Test Lab's liability to the customer or any third party is limited to the amount charged for services provided. All samples will be retained for a minimum of 1 month and may be destroyed thereafter unless otherwise specified by the customer. The recording of false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or entries on this document may be punished as a felony under federal statutes.

TEC Services

Page 1 of 2

IMR # 90470

IMR Test Labs • 4500 Leeds Avenue, Suite 306 • Charleston, SC 29405

RESULTS              
Element Beam Samples (wt. %)

Requirements for

all 1Shapes

(wt.%)

6SX02A 6SX03A 6SX09A 7SX08A 7SX09A 8SX03A
Carbon 0.08 0.14 0.10 0.16 0.08 0.21 0.26 max
Manganese 0.84 0.68 0.83 0.93 0.83 0.71 Not Specified
Phosporus 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04 max
Sulfur 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 max
Silicon 0.19 0.23 0.25 0.18 0.16 0.06 0.04 max
Chromium 0.02 0.13 0.05 0.13 0.03 0.05 Not Specified
Copper 0.10 0.21 0.27 0.31 0.16 0.02
Molybdenum 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.01 < 0.01
Nickel 0.04 0.10 0.14 0.10 0.05 0.03

1Unless copper steel is specified or the flange thickness is over 3 inches

Method(s): ASTM E415-08

Figure 1: Samples as received

Figure 1: Samples as received

TEC Services
Page 2 of 2
IMR # 90470
TEC Logo
TEC SERVICES
Testing Engineering Consulting
TESTING, ENGINEERING & CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.
JOB NAME:   OSHA  
JOB NUMBER:   09-0429.1  
BY: Philip J. Bender DATE: 5/20/2009
CHECKED BY: Kurt W. Heinrichs DATE: 5/20/2009

Table 1. Beam Measurements with AISC Nominal Designation

  Field Measurements  
Beam Label   Flange   AISC Reported
Nominal Designation
Depth, d Width, bf Thickness, tf Thickness, tw
(in) (in) (in)* (in)*
6SX02 10 1/4 4 0.357 0.262 W10x19
10 1/4 4 0.352 0.260
10 1/4 4 0.349 0.262
AISC** 10/1/4 4 0.395 0.250
6SX03 9 15/16 4 0.200 0.202 W10x12
9 15/16 4 0.201 0.199
9 15/16 4 0.194 0.204
AISC** 9 7/8 4 0.210 0.190
6SX09 9 15/16 3 15/16 0.225 0.193 W10x12
10 3 15/16 0.226 0.192
10 3 15/16 0.227 0.190
AISC** 9 7/8 4 0.210 0.190
7SX08 7 15/16 4 0.213 0.174 W8x10
7 15/16 4 0.203 0.174
7 15/16 4 0.207 0.176
AISC ** 7 7/8 4 0.205 0.170
7SX09 10 3/8 4 1/16 0.386 0.274 W10x19
10 3/8 4 1/8 0.367 0.267
10 3/8 4 1/16 0.367 0.271
AISC** 10 1/4 4 0.395 0.250  
8SX03 8 3 15/16 0.204 0.175 W8x10
7 15/16 3 15/16 0.203 0.177
8 3 15/16 0.209 0.177
AISC** 7 7/8 4 0.205 0.170

* - Measured with Ultrasonic Thickness Gauge
** - AISC 2005 Edition Published Dimensions

 
- Indicates dimension below AISC published dimension

TEC Logo
TEC SERVICES
Testing Engineering Consulting
TESTING, ENGINEERING & CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.
JOB NAME:   OSHA  
JOB NUMBER:   09-0429.1  
BY: Philip J. Bender DATE: 5/20/2009
CHECKED BY: Kurt W. Heinrichs DATE: 5/20/2009

Table 2. Summary of Physical Tests

Sample ID Yield Strength
(0.2%, offset),
Fy

Ultimate Strength,
Fu
Modulus, E Elongation
(ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (%)
6SX02-W1 59 69 29,059 36%
6SX02-W2 58 69 29,050 36%
6SX02-F1 57 68 28,873 36%
6SX02-F2 56 67 28,981 36%
         
6SX03-W1 48 68 29,062 34%
6SX03-F1 46 66 29,377 29%
6SX02-F2 47 66 29,224 27%
         
6SX09-W1 53 68 29,329 34%
6SX09-F1 51 67 29,340 33%
6SX09-F2 52 66 29,031 31%
         
7SX08-W1 57 76 29,098 30%
7SX08-F1 55 76 29,131 28%
7SX08-F2 55 76 29,458 30%
         
7SX09-W1 62 71 29,125 35%
7SX09-F1 56 67 29,078 36%
7SX09-F2 60 70 29,051 33%
         
8SX03-W1 53 71 29,080 31%
8SX03-F1 47 68 28,470 27%
ASTM A36 36 (min) 58 -80 N/A 21% (min)
ASTM A992 50 -65 65 (min) N/A 21% (min)

    - Does not meet ASTM A992 Specification Tensile Requirements
Chart 1. Specimen Identification: 6SX02-F1, 6SX02-W1, 6SX02-W2, 6SX02-F1

Chart 1. Specimen Identification: 6SX02-F1, 6SX02-W1, 6SX02-W2, 6SX02-F1

Chart 2. Specimen Identification: 6SX03-F1, 6SX03-W1, 6SX02-F2

Chart 2. Specimen Identification: 6SX03-F1, 6SX03-W1, 6SX02-F2

Chart 3. Specimen Identification: 7SX08-F1, 7SX08-W1, 7SX08-F2

Chart 3. Specimen Identification: 7SX08-F1, 7SX08-W1, 7SX08-F2

Chart 4. Specimen Identification: 6SX09-F1, 6SX09-W1, 6SX09-F2

Chart 4. Specimen Identification: 6SX09-F1, 6SX09-W1, 6SX09-F2

Chart 5. Specimen Identification: 7SX09-F1, 7SX09-W1, 7SX09-F2

Chart 5. Specimen Identification: 7SX09-F1, 7SX09-W1, 7SX09-F2

Chart 6. Specimen Identification: 8SX03-F1, 8SX03-W1

Chart 6. Specimen Identification: 8SX03-F1, 8SX03-W1


*Accessibility Assistance: Contact OSHA's Directorate of Construction at (202) 693-2020 for assistance accessing PDF materials.

All other documents, that are not PDF materials or formatted for the web, are available as Microsoft Office® formats and videos and are noted accordingly. If additional assistance is needed with reading, reviewing or accessing these documents or any figures and illustrations, please also contact OSHA's Directorate of Construction at (202) 693-2020.

**eBooks - EPUB is the most common format for e-Books. If you use a Sony Reader, a Nook, or an iPad you can download the EPUB file format. If you use a Kindle, you can download the MOBI file format.

Back to Top

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close