|
|
| Standard Number: | 1910.269 |
|
August 23, 1995
Mr. Enoch F. Nicewarner Dear Mr. Nicewarner: This is in response to your January 2 letter requesting clarification of the electric power generation, transmission, and distribution standard, 29 CFR 1910.269. Please accept our apology for the delay in responding. Your question and our reply follow. Question: Does "buzzing" the line constitute a sufficient test to determine the absence of "nominal Voltage" before grounds can be installed? Reply: The preferred method of testing line conductors to be sure they are deenergized (dead) before protective grounds are installed is using a high-voltage detector (voltmeter). However, paragraph 1910.269(n)(5) permits a circuit to be tested by "fuzzing (buzzing)" but that method should be used only when a high-voltage detector (voltmeter) is not available and when the presence of nominal voltage on the lines or equipment can be detected reliably in consideration of actual workplace conditions. Fuzzing procedures are considered unreliable in detecting voltages of less than 13.2 Y/ 7.62 kV. Fuzzing procedures are discussed in "The Lineman's and Cableman's Handbook, Eighth Edition, published by McGRAW-HILL, INC., ISBN 0-07-035695-5. We appreciate your interest in employee safety and health. If we can be of further assistance, please contact Mr. Ronald Davies of my staff, telephone #202-219-8031, extension 110.
Sincerely,
Raymond E. Donnelly, Director Dear Mr. Donnelly,
Please clarify the intent of the word "tested" in 29 CFR Part 1910.269
paragraph (n)(5). Does "buzzing" the line constitute a sufficient test to
determine the absence of "nominal voltage" before grounds can be installed?
|
|
|

Newsletter
RSS Feeds
Print This Page
Text Size
