|
November 8, 1988
| MEMORANDUM FOR: |
FRANK STRASHEIM |
| |
Regional Administrator |
| |
| THRU: |
LEO CAREY, Director |
| |
Directorate of Field Programs |
| |
| FROM: |
THOMAS J. SHEPICH, Director |
| |
Directorate of Compliance Programs |
| |
| SUBJECT: |
Interpretation of Fall Protection Requirements |
| |
on Construction Sites. |
In response to acting Deputy Regional Administrator, Thomas Marple, I am
providing a clarification of the circumstances where a safety monitor may be
used in lieu of a motion-stopping-safety system (MSS system) on construction
sites.
Under current OSHA regulations the only place where a safety monitor
may be used in lieu of a MSS is during built-up roofing operations on low
pitched roof perimeters. The record is clear that the safety monitor was not
the preferred means of protection and was intended only for circumstances
where it was not possible to provide other means of physical fall protection.
Although the standard does permit a monitor for built-up roofing work,
employers are also required to provide specific training for employees
engaged in the work to enable them to recognize and avoid the hazard of
falling. The safety monitor system was intended to apply in special cases as
referenced in 29 CFR 1926.500(g)(1)(ii) and 29 CFR 1926.500(g)(1)(iii). In
fact, 29 CFR 1926.500(g)(5) required a MSS system under those conditions
where it is anticipated employees will be required to work at the immediate
edge of the roof such as when employees are engaged in roof edge materials
handling and material storage.
With regard to the question of whether or not an employee working alone can
be his own monitor, the standard does not address this issue. The
supplemental information makes it clear that, although an employee may have
other duties in addition to monitoring, the work cannot be such that it would
cause the monitoring function to be encumbered.
If we can provide further guidance on this matter please let me know.
|