|

| DIRECTIVE NUMBER: DIR 01-01 (TED 3.5C) |
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 7, 2001 |
| SUBJECT: Interim Guidance for Consultation Programs |
ABSTRACT
| Purpose: |
To provide guidance to 21(d) Consultation Projects on implementing
programmatic and regulatory changes to the Consultation Program. |
| |
| Scope: |
This Direction applies OSHA-wide. It applies to all States or institutions operating a Cooperative Agreement under Section 21(d) of the OSH Act. |
| |
| Expiration Date: |
This Direction expires on June 30, 2001. |
| |
| Action Offices: |
Regional Offices (see Paragraph V. A. 1.) and States operating Cooperative Agreements under Section 21(d) of the OSH Act (see Paragraph V. B. 2.). |
| |
| Federal Program Change: |
This direction does not require a Federal Program Change for State Plans. Federal Program Changes related to matters covered in this Direction will be specified in Revised Consultation Policies and Procedures Manual (TED 3.5C) to be issued in FY 2001. |
| |
| Originating Office: |
Directorate of Federal State Operations. |
| |
| Contact: |
E. Tyna Coles at 202-693-2212
N3700 FPB
200 Constitution Ave.
Washington, DC 20210 |
By and Under the Authority of
R. Davis Layne
Acting Assistant Secretary
Purpose. To provide guidance to 21(d) Consultation Projects on implementing programmatic
and regulatory changes to the Consultation Program.
Scope. This Direction applies OSHA-wide. It applies to all States or institutions operating a
Cooperative Agreement under a Section 21(d) of the OSH Act.
Effective Date. The requirements of this Direction are effective upon the date of its publication.
Expiration Date. This Direction expires on June 30, 2001.
Action Information
Responsible Office. Directorate of Federal State Operations, Office of Cooperative Programs.
Action Offices
Regional Offices. Regional Offices are required to provide technical assistance
to the Consultation Projects and are responsible for monitoring the effectiveness
and implementation of the policies set forth in this Direction.
States. States or institutions operating Cooperative Agreements under Section
21(d) of the OSH Act are required to implement the changes required by this
Direction.
Federal Program Change. This Direction does not require a Federal Program Change for State Plans. Federal Program Changes related to matters covered in this Direction will be specified in Revised Consultation Policies and Procedures Manual (TED 3.5C) that is planned for publication in FY 2001.
Major Changes
Posting the List of Hazards. The employer must agree to post the List of Hazards, as it was received from the Consultation Project, for either three working days or until
the serious hazards are corrected, whichever is later. Agreed-upon modifications or
extensions of correction due dates must also be posted. Posting must be in a prominent
place where it is readily observable by all affected employees. The employer may post
the List of Hazards by electronic means if each employee is equipped with an electronic
communication device and electronic transmission is the employer's normal means of
providing notices to employees. Failure to post the List of Hazards will result in the
termination of the Consultation "Visit in Progress" status.
Confidentiality of the Report to the Employer. The employer's name and
the results of the onsite visit will remain confidential from State or Federal enforcement,
except in situations where imminent dangers or serious hazards are not corrected as agreed
upon, or where the employer participates in a State's inspection deferral or recognition and
exemption program. If an enforcement inspection occurs, the employer is not required
to inform the CSHO of the consultation onsite visit or furnish a copy of the results,
except to the extent that disclosure of information contained in the Report to the
Employer is required by 29 CFR 1910.1020, or other standards.
Consultation Visit in Progress. A consultation visit is in progress from the beginning of
the opening conference to the end of the correction due dates (including extensions). A
consultation Visit in Progress takes precedence over a Programmed OSHA Inspection.
The Directorate of Compliance Programs is drafting more detailed procedures to
implement this provision.
Employee Participation in Onsite Consultation Visits. Employee participation
is required in all site visits. Requirements vary according to whether the site is unionized,
as explained in the following table.
| If: |
then: |
| the site is unionized, |
an employee representative(s) of affected employees must be
afforded an opportunity to participate in the opening and closing
conferences and to accompany the consultant and the employer's
representative during the physical inspection of the workplace. The
consultant should encourage joint opening and closing conferences. If
there is an objection to a joint conference, the consultant must
conduct separate conferences with the employer and the employee
representatives. The consultant may increase the number of employee
participants in the physical inspection if he or she determines that
additional participants will improve the quality of the visit. The
consultant may confer privately with the employee representative(s). |
| the site is non-unionized, |
the consultant must confer with individual employees during the course
of the visit in order to identify and judge the extent of particular
hazards within the scope of the employer's request and to evaluate
the employer's safety and health management system. The employer
must agree to permit such contact in order for the visit to proceed. |
Safety and Health Achievement Recognition Program (SHARP). Each state operating
a Consultation Program under Section 21(d) of the OSH Act must operate a
recognition and exemption program. The Federal Program is known as the Safety and
Health Achievement Recognition Program (SHARP). Program operating in States with
approved State Plans may be known by other names. The following changes have
been made in the criteria and requirements for SHARP participation:
Employers participating in SHARP must have fewer than 250 employees at the
site and fewer than 500 employees corporation-wide.
Illness data are calculated in the data collected, so that the Lost Workday
Injury and Illness (LWDII) rate and Total Recordable Case Rate (TRCR)
replace the Lost Workday Injury rate and the Injury and Illness rate in the
criteria for SHARP participation.
A qualifying employer must have reduced the Lost Workday Injury and Illness
Incidence (LWDII) rate and Total Recordable Case Rate to below the industry
average.
After one year of participation, SHARP participants may be eligible to be
exempted from Programmed Inspections for a period of two years. The
employer must submit OSHA 200 Log data and a self-evaluation report during
the interim year.
In calculating the LWDII rate and TRCR of an applicant who is renewing
SHARP status, a multi-year calculation method must be used. See Appendix
A and Appendix B for the calculation methods and examples.
SHARP participants planning to relocate their facilities must notify the
Consultation Project Manager sixty days in advance of the move, and a
consultant must visit the new site within thirty days after the new site becomes
operational to ensure that the safety and health management system is operating
effectively.
Employers participating in SHARP must have implemented a safety and health
management system addressing, at a minimum, the elements of the 1989 Safety
and Health Program Management Guidelines:
- Management leadership and employee involvement
- Worksite analysis
- Hazard prevention
- Safety and health training
In the case of a fatality or catastrophe at a SHARP site, the employer must
notify the OSHA Area Office within eight hours of the incident. The Area
Director must notify the Consultation Project Manager as soon as possible after
notification of the incident. Until all enforcement considerations are resolved,
Consultation personnel must not discuss with the employer any issues related to
the fatality or catastrophe. After all enforcement considerations are resolved,
the Consultation Project Manager must evaluate the SHARP status of the
worksite using the following criteria:
If an inspection is conducted and no citation is issued, an onsite visit
must be conducted to ensure that all elements of the safety and health
management system are still operating effectively.
If an inspection is conducted and a serious or repeat violation is issued,
an onsite visit must be conducted to ensure that the safety and health
management system is still operating effectively. If the consultant
believes there is a connection between a serious citation and reduced
effectiveness in the safety and health management system, the
Consultation Project Manager must recommend that the SHARP
employer withdraw from the program. If there is no connection, the
employer must be counseled on how to prevent a recurrence.
If an inspection is conducted and a willful citation is issued, the SHARP
employer must be asked to withdraw from the program. The employer
may reapply 12 months after withdrawing from the program. The
Consultation Project Manager must notify the employer of termination
in writing and also inform the Area Office of the termination.
If the enforcement action uncovered evidence that the site's application
or annual self-evaluations were falsified, participation in SHARP must
be terminated.
Pre-SHARP Inspection Deferral. If a Consultation Project Manager determines that an
employer has agreed to participate in SHARP, has corrected all serious hazards
identified, and has begun to implement the action plan agreed upon with the consultant,
then the Consultation Project Manager may recommend to the Regional Administrator
or State Designee that the employer be deferred from General Schedule inspections
while working toward SHARP status. The deferral period recommended by the
Consultation Project Manager must not exceed 18 months from the final correction due
date(s). All of the following criteria must be met in order for deferral to be granted:
Employer's Obligations and Employees' Rights. The employer must:
a) Post the list of hazards identified by the consultant.
b) Provide information on all hazards identified by the consultant to employees
and inform employees when hazards are corrected.
c) Correct all serious hazards identified by consultants.
d) Show evidence of having the foundation of a safety and health management
system that includes the required elements of the 1989 Safety and Health
Program Management Guidelines.
e) Implement an Action Plan that includes the required elements of the 1989
Safety and Health Program Management Guidelines and is approved by the
Consultation Project Manager.
f) Post a notice of intention to participate in SHARP. At unionized sites, the
employer must notify the employee representative(s) of the employer's intention
to participate in SHARP and involve the union in the process.
g) Implement the Action Plan, provide progress reports to the Consultation
Project Manager and meet other state or project-specific requirements.
h) Agree to full service comprehensive visit by consultants at the end of the
deferral period.
i) Agree to notify the Consultation Project Manager prior to making any
changes in working conditions or work processes that might introduce new
hazards into the workplace
j) Involve employees in the safety and health management system, including the
implementation of the action plan.
k) Be capable of reducing the site's Lost Workday Injury and Illness (LWDII)
Rate and Total Recordable Case Rate (TRCR) to below the industry national
average within the deferral period.
Consultation Project Manager's Responsibilities. The Consultation Project
Manager must:
a) Conduct an onsite follow-up visit to verify correction of all hazards (serious
and other-than-serious) and compliance with requirements to post the list of
hazards and other employee information requirements.
b) Approve the Action Plan developed by the consultant and to be
implemented by the employer.
c) Determine if the employer is capable of meeting all SHARP requirements
within the deferral period, including the LWDII and TRCR requirements.
d) Provide a signed notice of intent to participate in SHARP, to be posted by
the employer. If, at a unionized site, the union representative(s) objects to the
site's involvement in SHARP, the Consultation Project Manager must advise
the employer that the application cannot go forward until labor and management
agree on the issue.
e) Recommend a deferral period (not to exceed 18 months from the end of the
correction due dates) to the Regional Administrator or State Designee.
Regional Administrator's or State Designee's Responsibilities. The Regional
Administrator or State Designee may grant an Inspection Deferral for the
period recommended by the Consultation Project Manager and notify the
appropriate Area Office of the deferral. Prior to granting a deferral, the
Regional Administrator or State Designee must ensure that:
a) The LWDII and TRCR requirements have been met or are likely to be met.
b) The Action Plan adequately addresses the required elements of a safety and
health management system as outlined in the 1989 Safety and Health Program
Management Guidelines and that there is reasonable expectation that the
employer will qualify for SHARP status by the end of the deferral period.
Interim Guidance
List of Hazards. Projects should be aware that regulatory hazards will only be included
on the list if they have been coded as serious. Software for the NCR was released in
December, 2000 and is in development for the Stand Alone Application. The
consultant is required to provide a description of the hazard, including its location, in a
data block associated with each Standard Element Paragraph (STEP) located in the
NCR "notebook." Whatever is entered into this data block will be written to the List of
Hazards. The List of Hazards will be created when the report to the employer is
assembled. If the STEPs have been moved to a local directory, the Project Manager
will need to contact the Office of Management Data Systems (OMDS) Help Desk for
assistance in creating the List of Hazards.
Projects that do not use the NCR or the Stand Alone application to assemble the
report to the employer must create the List of Hazards. These projects are responsible
for creating their own method of generating the List. The List of Hazards produced
independently by any Project must contain exactly the same information as the List of
Hazards produced on the NCR. See Appendix C for a sample List of Hazards in the
preferred format.
Below are two paragraphs that must be included in the transmittal letter accompanying
the Report to the Employer.
Accompanying this report is a List of Hazards which includes a description
of the serious hazard(s) and the date by which we mutually determined
that the hazard(s) would be corrected. This List of Hazards must be
posted, unedited, in a prominent location where it is readily observable by
all employees for three working days or until the hazard(s) have been
corrected, whichever is later. If we approve an extension to the
correction due dates, a new List of Hazards will be sent to you showing
the revised date(s).
During the time that you are working on correcting these hazard(s), OSHA
may not conduct a scheduled inspection at your work site, provided that:
a) you are within the correction due dates, b) interim protection is in place
and c) the List of Hazards is posted. Should these conditions not be met,
an OSHA compliance inspection may be conducted.
Where employers need an extension of the correction due date(s), they should be
advised by consultation personnel to request the extension before the expiration of the
correction due date in order to maintain "Visit in Progress" status.
The recently released software for the List of Hazards includes a routine for granting
extensions. However, it recompiles the List including those hazards which have been
corrected and are closed. Project Managers may write the word, "closed" on the area
of the correction due date prior to sending the revised list to the employer, if information
has been received verifying the correction of the hazard.
Employers must be told that in addition to posting the List of Hazards, employees also
have the right to review the other-than-serious hazards and the proposed corrective
action (which are included in the report to the employer). The employer must make
these available in a separate file.
When visiting a union site, the name and address of the union representative must be
obtained for the purpose of mailing a copy of the List of Hazards to the representative.
Recognition and Exemption Programs. Promotional material developed by
Consultation Project Managers in Federal States must include information about
SHARP.
Appendix A
Lost Workday Injury and Illness Rate (LWDII)
The annual LWDII rate is calculated according to the following formula:
| LWDII Rate = |
# lost workday injuries and illnesses x 200,000
# employee hours worked |
Where:
# Lost workday injury and illnesses = sum of Column 2 and Column 9 from the OSHA
Log in the reference year.
# employee hours worked = sum of employee hours worked (including all employees
whose injuries/illnesses are recorded on the log, minus exempt and temporary workers'
hours) in the reference year.
200,000 = base for 100 full-time workers working 40 hours per week, 50 weeks per
year
Sample One-Year LWDII Rate Calculation:
In calculating the LWDII rate of an establishment scheduled for inspection in October 1999, injury and
illness cases and employment data for the preceding calendar year is used.
# LWDIIs in 1998 = 5
# workers employed in 1998 = 54
# employee hours worked in 1998 = 54 workers x 40 hours x 50 weeks = 108,000
| LWDII Rate |
= |
5 x 200,000 108,000 |
| |
= |
1,000,000 108,000 |
| |
= |
9.26 (rounded to 9.3)
|
Sample Two-Year LWDII Rate Calculation:
An establishment scheduled for inspection in October 2000 employed an average of 50 workers in
1999 and 54 workers in 1998. The injury and illness cases and employment data for the two preceding
calendar years will be used.
# LWDIIs in 1998 = 5
# LWDIIs in 1999 = 6
# employee hours worked in 1998 = 108,000
# employee hours worked in 1999 = 100,000
Two-Year LWDII Rate =
| 5 [Year 1 # LWDII] + 6 [Year 2 #LWDII] x 200,000 |
|
| 108,000 [Year 1 # employee hours worked] + 100,000 [Year 2 # employee hours worked] |
| = |
(5 + 6) x 200,000 108,000 + 100,000 |
| = |
2,200,000 208,000 |
| = |
10.58 (rounded to 10.6) |
Three-Year LWDII Rate Calculation:
When determining the rate for an employer who has been in SHARP for two or more years, calculate
the LWDII Rate as in the two-year sample above, but include the third year's data.
Appendix B
Total Recordable Case Rate (TRCR)
The Total Recordable Case Rate (TRCR) is the rate of total non-fatal injuries and
illnesses for the calendar year reviewed. The TRCR is compared to the rate in the
column of Total Cases that most precisely corresponds to the Standard Industrial
Classification (SIC) code of the site under review. The column of Total Cases is
found in the table of Incidence Rates as reported in the annual BLS Data on Occupational
Injuries and Illnesses.
The annual TRCR is calculated according to the following formula:
| TRCR = |
(# recordable injuries + # recordable illnesses) x 200,000 # employee hours worked |
Where:
# recordable injuries = sum of Column 2 and Column 6 from the OSHA Log in the
reference year.
# recordable illnesses = sum of Column 9 and Column 13 from the OSHA Log in the reference year.
# employee hours worked = sum of employee hours worked (including all employees
whose injuries/illnesses are recorded on the log, minus exempt and temporary workers'
hours) in the reference year.
200,000 = base for 100 full-time workers working 40 hours per week, 50 weeks per year
Sample One-Year TRCR Calculation:
An establishment scheduled for inspection in October 1999 employed an average of 54
workers in 1998. Therefore, injury and illness cases and employment data for the preceding
calendar year will be used.
# recordable injuries = 9
# recordable illnesses = 4
# employee hours worked in 1998 = 54 workers x 40 hours x 50 weeks = 108,000
| TRCR |
= |
(9 + 4) x 200,000 108,000 |
| |
= |
2,600,000 108,000 |
| |
= |
24.07 (rounded to 24.1) |
Sample Two-Year TRCR Calculation:
An establishment scheduled for inspection in October 2000 employed an average of 50
workers in 1999 and 54 workers in 1998. The injury and illness cases and employment
data for the two preceding calendar years will be used.
In calendar year 1998:
# recordable injuries = 9
# recordable illnesses = 4
# employee hours worked = 108,000
In calendar year 1999:
# recordable injuries = 14
# recordable illnesses = 7
# employee hours worked = 100,000
Two-Year TRCR =
| 9 + 4 [Year 1 recordable data] + 14 + 7 [Year 2 recordable data] x 200,000 |
|
| 108,000 [Year 1 # employee hours worked] + 100,000 [Year 2 # employee hours worked] |
| = |
(9 + 4 + 14 + 7) x 200,000 108,000 + 100,000 |
| = |
6,800,000 208,000 |
| = |
32.69 (rounded to 32.7) |
Three-Year TRCR Calculation:
When determining the rate for an employer who has been in SHARP for two or more
years, calculate the TRCR as in the two-year sample above, but include the third
year's data.
Appendix C
Sample List of Hazards in the Preferred Format
LIST OF HAZARDS(1)
This List of Hazards must be posted, unedited, in a prominent place where it is readily
observable by all affected employees for three (3) days, or until the hazards are corrected,
whichever is later.
VISIT NUMBER: 515196904
VISIT DATE(S): 01/17/01
Wilson Eye Center
435 Pine Street
Dallas, TX 75003
This is a notification of serious hazards identified during the consultation visit.
This notification is not a citation. The Wilson Eye Center is a
voluntary participant in the consultation program and has agreed to correct the
hazards on this list within the correction due date(s) specified. The Wilson Eye
Center has also agreed to make information on other-than-serious hazards as well
as corrective action proposed by the consultant available to you upon request.
| ITEM |
0001 |
STANDARD |
1910.0132(d)(01) |
| INSTANCE |
A |
CORRECTION DUE DATE: |
02/23/01 |
DESCRIPTION: A list of job titles, any potential hazards
associated with the job and what personal protective equipment, if any, would be
needed to protect the employee from the hazard or hazards.
|
| ITEM |
0002 |
STANDARD |
1910.0151(c) |
| INSTANCE |
A |
CORRECTION DUE DATE: |
02/23/01 |
DESCRIPTION: The eyewash station is placed correctly; however,
only hot water can be accessed which would cause further injury to the eye(s). An
eliminator valve plumbed into the system would eliminate this problem.
|
| ITEM |
0003 |
STANDARD |
1910.1030(d)(02)(i) |
| INSTANCE |
A |
CORRECTION DUE
DATE: |
02/23/01 |
DESCRIPTION: New types of engineering controls are on the
market that can help eliminate sharps (needle) injuries. The facility needs to
be evaluating these and moving toward the use of any system that would be feasible
for their type of practice.
|
| ITEM |
0004 |
STANDARD |
1910.1200(e)(01)(i) |
| INSTANCE |
A |
CORRECTION DUE DATE: |
02/23/01 |
DESCRIPTION: A list of hazardous chemicals that are onsite needs to be added to the written HAZARD COMMUNICATION PROGRAM.
|
If you have any questions regarding this list of hazards which cannot be answered
by our employer, please contact the state consultation program at (555) 693-2231 or
(555) 693-1671.
Footnote (1) The first page of the List of Hazards should be printed on the Consultation Project's letterhead. (Back to Text)
|