|
|
| Record Type: | Instruction |
| Directive Number: | CSP 02-01-002 |
| Old Directive Number: | TED 3.9 |
| Title: | Information Dissemination System for Consultation Visits Resulting in Significant Benefits |
| Information Date: | 12/30/1987 |
|
OSHA Instruction TED 3.9 DEC 30, 1987 Office of Consultation Programs Subject: Information Dissemination System for Consultation Visits Resulting in Significant Benefits A. Purpose. This instruction establishes procedures for collecting and disseminating information relative to specific consultation visits which have resulted in significant benefits to employees and their employees. B. Scope. This instruction applies OSHA-wide. C. Action. Regional Administrators shall ensure that the Policy and Procedures established in this instruction are adhered to by all 7(c)(1) consultation projects. D. Federal Program Change. This instruction describes a Federal program change which affects States providing consultation under Section 23(g) funding. Each Regional Administrator shall:
OSHA Instruction TED 3.9 DEC 30, 1987 Office of Consultation Programs E. Background. Over 25,000 onsite consultation visits are conducted nationwide each year. Valuable data relative to hazard identification and hazard control are collected and routinely placed in case files and shared only with the employer concerned. This potentially valuable information is infrequently, if ever, shared with other employers, interested groups or other parties. Likewise, invaluable information on the benefits to the employer and employees from having participated in the total consultative process, including having taken advantage of the training and education and/or safety and health program assistance services, rarely is shared with others. This instruction is intended to provide for the collection and wide dissemination of this information to interested parties and organizations outside of OSHA and within OSHA. As a by-product of this activity, the consultation program will accrue additional tangible evidence of the value of its services which can be made available to employers and other interested parties. F. Procedures. Consultation Project Managers will be responsible for the development of brief, written summaries of selected consultation cases and for their transmission to the appropriate Regional Office. Specific guidelines to be followed are set forth below:
OSHA Instruction TED 3.9 DEC 30, 1987 Office of Consultation Programs
OSHA Instruction TED 3.9 DEC 30, 1987 Office of Consultation Programs
John A. Pendergrass Assistant Secretary Distribution: National and Regional Offices State Designees 7(c)(1) Project Managers
OSHA Instruction TED 3.9 DEC 30, 1987 Office of Consultation Programs
Project Record Only Firm Name: Address: Contact: Phone: Request Number: Public Information Request (Purpose/Problem): Type of Business (Include SIC): Size of workforce: Visit Type: Hazard(s) Identified (Standard/Classification): Correction Period (actual Time to Correct):
OSHA Instruction TED 3.9 DEC 30, 1987 Office of Consultation Programs
__________________________________________________________________________
EMPLOYER REQUESTED A GENERAL SAFETY SURVEY TO MAKE SURE THAT HE WAS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE OSH ACT. TRANSFORMER MANUFACTURER This small employer (75 employees) manufacturers transformers for the electronics industry. The process includes tube and bobbin winding operations; hand soldering/varnishing; and electrical testing. The assembly type operations require repetitive motions with the wrist, hands and fingers being in a deviated or stressful position. CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME (CTS) COMMON As a result of a records review of the OSHA 200 Form, the safety consultant noticed that 6 of the 8 illnesses recorded on the 1985 Form were carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) with 3 illnesses already recorded for the first 3 months of 1986. CONSULTANT'S ANALYSIS Areas identified by the consultant which could lead to carpal tunnel syndrome were: (1) the manual hammering operations in which an operator uses a ball pean hammer to drive a rivet type screw into place; (2) the screwdriver operator must force the tool into position and lean against the tool to keep correct placement on the screws; (3) straight handled soldering irons which require the wrist to be in a deviated position. RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations were made to the employer to replace the manual hammering operations with a machine that does the same work; to redesign the work station for the screwdriver operator with a device which allows sideways and in-out movement of the screwdriver (forcing screwdriver into place and leaning against it to keep correct placement on the screws); to replace the straight soldering irons with ones which have been ergonomically designed; and to rotate employees periodically so that they do not constantly work in an area which requires repetitive wrist motions. RESULTS: CTS COMPLAINTS DOWN, PRODUCTION UP The employer was contacted 6 months after the survey. They have replaced the manual hammering operations with an air press which they designed in house; replaced the screwdriver and few of the soldering irons. He reported that he has only received 1 complaint of CTS since he made the change; that his production was increased by the use of the air press; and that once the operators got used to the new soldering irons, they liked them. He intends to replace the remaining soldering irons within the next few months.
|
|
|

Newsletter
RSS Feeds
Print This Page
Text Size
