<< Back to Sampling and Analytical Methods
For problems with accessibility in using figures, illustrations and PDFs in this method, please contact the SLTC at (801) 233-4900.
These procedures were designed and tested for internal use by OSHA personnel. Mention of any company name or commercial product does not constitute endorsement by OSHA.
Pyridine
[81 KB PDF, 10 pages]
Related Information: Chemical Sampling - Pyridine
| Method no.: |
PV2295 |
| |
|
| Control number: |
T-PV2295-01-9112-CH |
| |
|
| Matrix: |
Air |
| |
|
| Target concentration: |
5 ppm (15 mg/m3) |
| OSHA PEL: |
5 ppm (15 mg/m3) |
| |
|
| Procedure: |
Samples are collected by drawing a known volume of air through two
XAD-7 tubes connected in series. Samples are desorbed with methanol
and analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) using a flame ionization
detector (FID). |
| |
|
Air volume and sampling rate:
|
100 min at 0.1 L/min (10 L) |
| |
|
| Status of method: |
Partially validated method. This method has been partially evaluated
and is presented for information and trial use only. |
| |
|
| December 1991 |
Wayne Potter |
| |
|
Organic Methods Evaluation Branch
OSHA Salt Lake Technical Center
Sandy UT 84070-6406 |
1 General Discussion
1.1 Background
1.1.1 History of procedure
The OSHA laboratory periodically receives samples collected on charcoal with requested analysis for pyridine (NIOSH 1613).The NIOSH method recommends a maximum of 150 liters of air be sampled at 1.0 L/min. However, the samples the laboratory receives usually have only 10 liters of air sampled. This is a problem because at low loadings of pyridine the desorption efficiency from charcoal is low and not constant.The goal of this evaluation was to develop a sampling and analytical procedure for pyridine which has high and constant desorption efficiency at low loadings which would permit 10 liters of air to be sampled.
1.1.2 Toxic effects (This section is for information purposes only and should not be taken as the basis for OSHA policy.)
Vapor from pyridine is irritating to mucous surfaces, causing eye and nasal irritations. Exposures at levels from 15 - 330 ppm cause nausea, headache, insomnia, and nervousness. (Ref. 5.1). Small oral doses (2 to 3-mL) in humans produce mild anorexia, nausea, fatigue, and mental depression. Ingestion of several ounces causes severe vomiting, diarrhea, hyperpyrexia, delirium, and death (Ref. 5.2).
1.1.3 Potential workplace exposure
No potential workplace exposure data could be found. However, the major use of pyridine is in the synthesis of vitamins and drugs, solvent waterproofing, rubber chemicals, denaturant for alcohol and anti-freeze mixtures, dyeing assistant in textiles, and fungicides (Ref. 5.3).
1.1.4 Physical properties:
| CAS: |
110-86-1 |
| RTECS: |
UR 8400000; 70423 |
| IMIS: |
2220 |
| Compound: |
Pyridine |
| Molecular weight: |
79.10 |
| Density: |
0.9780 (25/4 °C) |
| Boiling point: |
115.5 °C |
| Freezing point: |
- 42.0 °C |
| Odor: |
Nauseating odor |
| Color: |
Slightly yellow or colorless liquid |
| Solubility: |
Soluble in water, alcohol, ether, benzene, ligroin, and fatty oils. |
| Molecular formula: |
C5H5N |
| Flash point: |
68 °F (20 °C) (closed cup) |
| Structure: |

|
1.2 Limit defining parameters
The detection limit of the analytical procedure is 0.87 pg per injection (1.0 µL injection).This is the smallest amount of analyte which will produce a peak 5 times the baseline noise (See Figure 1).
1.3 Advantages
1.3.1 The sampling procedure is convenient.
1.3.2 The analytical method is reproducible and sensitive.
1.3.3 Reanalysis of samples is possible.
1.3.4 It may be possible to analyze other compounds at the same time.
1.3.5 Interferences may be avoided by proper selection of GC column and parameters.
2 Sampling procedure
2.1 Apparatus
2.1.1 Samples are collected using a personal sampling pump calibrated to within ±5% at the recommended flow rate with the sampling tubes in-line.
2.1.2 Samples are collected with two solid sorbent sampling tubes containing XAD-7 connected in series.Each tube consists of two sections of adsorbent separated by a glass wool plug.The front section contains 100 mg of adsorbent and the back section 50 mg.The sections are held in place with glass wool plugs in a glass tube 110-mm × 6-mm o.d.For this evaluation, SKC XAD-7 tubes (catalog no. 226-95) were used.
2.2 Technique
2.2.1 Immediately before sampling, break off the ends off the adsorbent tube.All tubes should be from the same lot. Connect both tubes with a small piece of flexible tubing.
2.2.2 Connect the sampling tubes in series to the sampling pump with flexible tubing. Position the tubes so that sampled air passes through the 100-mg section first.
2.2.3 Air being sampled should not pass through any hose or tubing before entering the sampling tube.
2.2.4 Place the sampling tubes vertically (to avoid channeling) in the employee's breathing zone.
2.2.5 After sampling, separate the tubes and seal them with plastic end caps. Wrap samples lengthwise with a Form OSHA-21 seal.
2.2.6 Submit at least one blank sampling tube with each sample set. Blanks should be handled in the same manner as samples (break ends, seal, and transport), except no air is drawn through them.
2.2.7 Record sample air volumes (in liters of air) for each sample, along with any potential interference.
2.2.8 Ship bulk sample(s) in a container separate from the air samples.
2.3 Desorption Efficiency
Three sets of six tubes each were liquid spiked at three separate loadings. The average desorption efficiency for pyridine from XAD-7 is 99.8% over the range of 0.1 to 1 times the target concentration.(Table 2.3)
|
Table 2.3
Desorption Efficiency |
|
sample
# |
% desorption
|
0.1 ×
16.3 µg |
0.5 ×
81.5 µg |
1 ×
163.0 µg |
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
average |
99.0
96.4
95.0
96.4
99.0
99.6
97.6 |
98.9
99.4
99.0
98.9
100.3
100.0
99.4 |
101.4
101.8
100.6
102.4
104.4
103.6
102.4 |
|
standard
deviation |
±1.89 |
±0.636 |
±1.41 |
|
overall average = 99.8% |
2.4 Retention Efficiency
The front glass wool plug for six sets of two XAD-7 tubes connected in series was spiked at the target concentration with pyridine.Ten liters of humid air (78% RH) were drawn through the tubes at 0.1 L/min.The XAD-7 tubes were stored for several hours and then desorbed with 1 mL of methanol containing 1.0 µL/mL N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) as the internal standard.The samples were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) with a flame ionization detector (FID).The average retention efficiency was 100% (Table 2.4).
|
Table 2.4
Retention Efficiency |
|
tube
# |
air
volume |
µg
spiked |
%
recovered |
|
1
2
3
4
5
6 |
10 L
10 L
10 L
10 L
10 L
10 L |
163.0
163.0
163.0
163.0
163.0
163.0 |
100.3
100.7
99.1
98.7
101.2
99.7 |
|
average = 100% |
2.5 Storage
Storage samples were generated by spiking twelve XAD-7 adsorbent tubes with pyridine at the target concentration.Half of the tubes were stored at ambient temperature (about 23 °C) and the other half were stored in a freezer (-12 °C).Three samples from each set were analyzed approximately every three days.The average recovery for ambient storage was 97.9%; for freezer storage, it was 99.9% (Table 2.5).
Table 2.5
Storage Study |
|
days
stored |
% recovered
(ambient) |
% recovered
(freezer) |
|
0
5
11 |
101.4
98.8
94.6 |
101.8
96.9
94.8 |
100.6
98.1
94.2 |
102.4
99.0
97.3 |
104.4
97.0
97.2 |
103.6
101.0
97.3 |
|
2.6 Precision
Precision is measured by the pooled coefficient of variation (CV) from repeated injections of three standards prepared at levels from 0.5 × to 2 × the PEL. The pooled CV is 0.002569 (Table 2.6).
Table 2.6
Precision Study |
|
injection
number |
0.5 ×
81.5 µg |
1 ×
163.0 µg |
2 ×
326.1 µg |
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
average |
80.774
80.185
80.469
80.866
80.218
80.396
80.485 |
164.055
163.650
163.513
163.759
163.793
164.157
163.821 |
325.927
325.887
326.564
325.057
326.314
327.311
326.177 |
|
standard
deviation
CV |
±0.282
0.00351 |
±0.243
0.00149 |
±0.752
0.00230 |
|
pooled CV = 0.002569 |
Where:
| CV (Coefficient of Variation) |
= |
(standard deviation)
|
| |
|
average |
| |
|
|
|
| Pooled CV |
= |
 |

A1 ( CV1 )2 + A2 ( CV2 )2 + A3 ( CV3 )2
|
| |
|
A1 + A2 + A3 |
A1, A2, A3 = number of injections at each level
CV1, CV2, CV3 = Coefficients of variation at each level
2.7 Air volume and sampling rate studies
2.7.1 The air volume studied was 10 liters.
2.7.2 The sampling rate studied was 0.1 L/min.
2.8 Interferences
Suspected interferences should be listed on sample data sheets.
2.9 Safety precautions
2.9.1 Sampling equipment should be placed on the employee in a manner that does not interfere with work performance or safety.
2.9.2 Safety glasses should be worn at all times.
2.9.3 Follow all safety practices that apply to the workplace being sampled.
3 Analytical method
3.1 Apparatus
3.1.1 Gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and an automatic sample injector.
3.1.2 GC column capable of separating the analyte and an internal standard from any interference. A 60-m x 0.32-mm i.d. (with 1.0 µm df Stabilwax-DB) fused silica capillary column was used in this evaluation.
3.1.3 An electronic integrator or some other suitable method of measuring peak areas. A Hewlett-Packard 3396A integrator was used in this evaluation.
3.1.4 Two-milliliter vials with PTFE-lined caps.
3.1.5 A 10 µL syringe and other convenient sizes for standard preparations.
3.1.6 Pipettes for dispensing the desorbing solution.The Glenco 1-mL dispenser was used in this evaluation.
3.1.7 Volumetric flasks - 5 mL and other convenient sizes for preparing standards.
3.2 Reagents
3.2.1 Purified GC grade nitrogen, hydrogen, and air.
3.2.2 Methanol, Reagent grade.
3.2.3 N,N-Dimethylformamide, Reagent grade.
3.2.4 Internal standard solution; 1.0 µL/mL N,N-dimethylformamide in methanol.
3.3 Sample preparation
3.3.1 Sample tubes are opened and the front and back section of each tube are placed in separate 2-mL vials.
3.3.2 Each section is desorbed with 1 mL of internal standard solution.
3.3.3 The vials are immediately sealed with PTFE-lined caps and allowed to desorb for 60 minutes with occasional shaking.
3.4 Standard preparation
3.4.1 Standards are prepared by diluting a known quantity of pyridine with the internal standard solution.
3.4.2 At least two separate standards should be made.
3.5 Analysis
3.5.1 Gas chromatograph conditions.
| Flow rates |
(mL/min) |
Temperature |
( °C) |
|
| Nitrogen (make-up): |
30 |
Injector: |
200 |
| Hydrogen (carrier): |
3.0 |
Detector: |
250 |
| Hydrogen (detector): |
30 |
Column: |
60 -160 |
| Air: |
350 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Injection size: |
1.0 µL (with a 5:1 split) |
| Elution time: |
13.5 minutes |
| Chromatogram: |
(See Figure 2) |
| Column: |
60-m x 0.32-mm i.d. (with 1.0 µm df Stabilwax-DB) fused silica capillary. |
3.5.2 Peak areas are measured by an integrator or other suitable means.
3.6 Interferences (analytical)
3.6.1 Any compound having the general retention time of the analyte or the internal standard used is an interference. GC parameters may be adjusted to eliminate interferences.
3.6.2 Retention time data on a single column is not considered proof of chemical identity. Pyridine in samples containing greater than the OSHA PEL should be confirmed by GC/Mass Spectrometry or other suitable means.
3.7 Calculations
3.7.1 The mass of pyridine found on each section of the sampling train is added together for reporting purposes. If the backup section of tube "B" contains a mass of pyridine equal to or greater than 25% of the mass in the front section of that tube, the sample should be labeled as possibly saturated.
3.7.2 The analyte concentration for samples is obtained from the following formula.If any analyte is found on the backup sections, the concentration of each section is calculated separately and then added to the amount found on the front section.
| mg/m3 |
= |
(µg/mL, blank corrected) (desorption volume, mL)
|
| |
|
(air volume, L) (desorption efficiency, decimal) |
| ppm |
= |
(mg/m3)(24.46)
|
| |
|
(MW) |
where 24.46 = molar volume (liters/mole) at 760 mmHg and 25 °C.
MW = molecular weight = 79.10 for pyridine.
3.8 Safety precautions
3.8.1 All handling of solvents should be done in a hood.
3.8.2 Avoid skin contact with all chemicals.
3.8.3 Wear safety glasses, disposable gloves and a lab coat at all times in lab areas.
4 Recommendations for further study
Further work should be done to fully validate the method.
5 References
5.1 "Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices." 5th ed. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 1986.
5.2 Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge."Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products." 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.
5.3 "Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary", 11th edition; Sax, N.I., Lewis, R.J., ed.; Van Norstrand Reinhold Company, New York, 1987; p. 982.
Figure 1. Chromatogram of Detection Limit of Pyridine

Figure 2. Chromatogram of Pyridine Standard
|