1. General Discussion
1.1 Background
1.1.1 History of procedure
The OSHA Technical Center has received many requests for a sampling and analytical procedure for o-sec-butylphenol (OSBP). OSHA promulgated an exposure standard for o-sec-butylphenol in January, 1989, at a level of 5 ppm.
OSHA method 32 recommends collection of phenol and cresol on XAD-7 tubes and
desorption with methanol (Ref. 5.1). OSBP is related to these compounds, so this
means of collection and analysis was tried and found to be successful. The
desorption, retention and storage studies all had recoveries above 94.9%.
1.1.2 Potential workplace exposure (Ref. 5.2)
OSBP is used as a chemical intermediate, and in the manufacture of resins,
plasticizers, and surface active agents.
1.1.3 Toxic Effects (This section is for information purposes and should not be
taken as the basis for OSHA policy.) (Ref. 5.3)
OSBP is a skin and eye irritant. In reported occupational exposures, OSBP was a
mild respiratory irritant. Skin exposures resulted in burns.
1.1.4 Physical properties (Re. 5.2):
| Compound: |
 |
| Synonyms: |
2-sec-butylphenol |
| Molecular weight: |
150.24 |
| Melting point: |
12ºC |
| Boiling point: |
226ºC |
| Flash point: |
107ºC
(225ºF)(closed cup) |
| Odor: |
phenolic |
| Color: |
colorless to light yellow liquid |
| Molecular formula: |
C10H140 |
| CAS: |
89-72-5 |
| IMIS: |
B705 |
| RTECS: |
SJ8920000; 56581 |
| DOT: |
UN2228 |
1.2 Limit defining parameters
1.2.1 The detection limit of the analytical procedure is 1 µg o-sec-butylphenol.
This is the smallest amount that could be detected under normal operating
conditions.
1.2.2 The overall detection limit is 0.008 ppm. (All ppm amounts in this study
are based on a 20 liter air volume.)
1.3 Advantages
1.3.1 The sampling procedure is convenient.
1.3.2 The analytical
method is reproducible and sensitive.
1.3.3 Reanalysis of samples is possible.
1.3.4 It may be possible to analyze other compounds at the same time.
1.3.5 Interferences may be avoided by proper selection of column and GC
parameters.
1.4 Disadvantages
None known.
2. Sampling technique
2.1 Apparatus
2.1.1 A calibrated personal sampling pump, the flow of which can be determined
within ± 5% at the recommended flow.
2.1.2 XAD-7 tubes containing 15/50 mesh XAD-7 with a 100 mg adsorbing section
with a 50 mg backup section separated by silanized glass wool plug, with a
silanized glass wool plug before and at the back of the backup section. The
ends are flame sealed and the glass tube containing the adsorbent is 8 cm
long, with a 8 mm O.D. and 6 mm I.D., SKC tubes or equivalent.
2.2 Sampling technique
2.2.1 Open the ends of the XAD-7 tubes immediately before sampling.
2.2.2 Connect the XAD-7 tubes to the sampling pump with flexible tubing.
2.2.3 Place the tubes in a vertical position to minimize channeling, with the
smaller section towards the pump.
2.2.4 Air being sampled should not pass through any hose or tubing before
entering the XAD-7 tubes.
2.2.5 Seal the XAD-7 tubes with plastic caps immediately after sampling. Seal
each sample lengthwise with OSHA Form-21 sealing tape.
2.2.6 With each batch of samples, submit at least one blank tube from the same
lot used for samples. This tube should be subjected to exactly the same
handling as the samples (break ends, seal & transport) except that no air is
drawn through it.
2.2.7 Transport the samples (and corresponding paper work) to the lab for
analysis.
2.2.8 Bulks submitted for analysis must be shipped in a separate container
from other samples.
2.3 Desorption efficiency
Six tubes were spiked with loadings of 59.9
µg (0.487 ppm), 300 µg (2.44 ppm), and 599 µg (4.87 ppm) OSBP. They were
allowed to equilibrate overnight at room temperature. They were opened, each
section placed into a separate 2 mL vial, desorbed with 1 mL of methanol with
1 µL/mL dimethyl formamide internal standard for 30 minutes with occasional
shaking, and analyzed by GC-FID. The overall average was 94.9%. (Table 1)
Table 1
Desorption Efficiency
|
| Tube# |
59.9 µg |
% Recovered
300 µg |
599 µg |
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
average |
95.2
95.3
96.0
94.0
95.9
97.6
95.7 |
96.1
95.3
94.4
95.5
94.6
95.6
95.3 |
93.4
93.8
93.7
94.5
93.3
94.0
93.8 |
| |
|
|
|
overall average 94.9
standard deviation ± 1.13 |
|
2.4 Retention efficiency
Six tubes were spiked with 599 µg (4.87 ppm) OSBP, allowed to equilibrate
overnight, and then had 20 liters humid air (89% RH) pulled through them. They
were opened desorbed and analyzed by GC-FID. The retention efficiency averaged
99.7%. There was no OSBP found on the backup portions of the tubes. The
results were corrected for desorption efficiency. (Table 2)
Table 2
Retention Efficiency
|
| Tube # |
% Recovered
"A" |
% Recovered
"B" |
Total |
|
1
2
3
4
5
6 |
101
100
99.3
101
97.7
99.2 |
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0 |
101
100
99.3
101
97.7
99.2 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
average 99.7 |
|
2.5 Storage
Tubes were spiked with 599 µg (4.87 ppm) OSBP and stored at room temperature
until opened and analyzed. Since OSBP may decompose in light, half of the
tubes were stored under room light, and half were stored in darkness. The
samples were found to be stable under both conditions. Results were corrected
for desorption efficiency. The recoveries averaged 98.5% for the 14 days
stored. (Table 3)
Table 3
Storage Study
|
| Day |
% Recovered light |
% Recovered dark |
|
7
7
7
14
14
14 |
100
96.6
lost
97.5
96.9
96.1 |
100
101
101
98.0
98.1
98.5 |
| |
|
|
| overall average 98.5 |
|
|
2.6 Precision
The precision was calculated using the area counts from six injections of each
standard at concentrations of 59.9, 300, 599, and 1198 µg/mL o-sec-butylphenol
in the desorbing solution. The pooled coefficient of variation was 0.00382
(Table 4)
Table 4
Precision Study |
|
Injection
Number |
59.9 µg/mL |
300 µg/mL |
599 µg/mL |
1198 µg/mL |
|
1
2
3
4
5
6 |
18818
18754
18932
18933
18661
18844 |
94167
93814
93727
93357
93463
94214 |
188787
188507
188052
189711
189578
189002 |
382116
383068
383614
383533
383214
382807 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Average |
18824 |
93790 |
188940 |
383059 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Standard
Deviation |
±105 |
352 |
633 |
549 |
| CV |
0.00558 |
0.00375 |
0.00335 |
0.00143 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Pooled CV |
0.00382 |
|
|
|
|
where:
| |
standard deviation |
| CV (Coefficient of Variation) = |
|
| |
average |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pooled CV = /\ |
|
|
|
|
|
/ |
A1(CV1) ^ 2 +
A2 (CV2) ^ 2 + A3(CV3) ^ 2 + A4(CV4) ^ 2 |
| |
\ |
|
|
|
/ |
|
------------------------------------------------------------ |
| |
|
\ |
|
/ |
|
|
A1 + A2 + A3 + A4 |
| |
|
|
V |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A(1), A(2), A(3), A(4) = # of injections at each level
CV1, CV2, CV3, CV4 = Coefficients at each level |
2.7 Air volume and sampling rate studied
2.7.1 The air volume studied is 20 liters.
2.7.2 The sampling rate studied is 0.2 liters per minute.
2.8 Interferences
Suspected interferences should be listed on sample data sheets.
2.9 Safety precautions
2.9.1 sampling equipment should be placed on an employee in a manner that does not interfere with work performance or safety.
2.9.2 Safety glasses should be worn at all times.
2.9.3 Follow all safety practices that apply to the workplace being sampled.
3. Analytical method
3.1 Apparatus
3.1.1 Gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector. A HP 5890 gas chromatograph was used in
this study.
3.1.2 GC column capable of separating the analyte and an internal standard from any interferences. The column used in this study
was a 30 meter DB-225 capillary column, 0.25 µ d.f., and 0.32 mm I.D. An
alternate column is a 60 meter DB-1 capillary column, 1.0 µ d.f., and 0.32 mm
I.D.
3.1.3 An electronic integrator or some other suitable method of measuring peak
areas.
3.1.4 Two milliliter vials with Teflon-lined caps.
3.1.5 A 10 µL syringe or other convenient size for sample injection.
3.1.6 Pipets for dispensing the desorbing solution. The Glenco 1 mL dispenser
was used in this method.
3.1.7 Volumetric flasks - 5 mL and other convenient sizes for preparing
standards.
3.2 Reagents
3.2.1 Purified GC grade nitrogen, hydrogen, and air.
3.2.2 o-sec-Butylphenol, Reagent grade
3.2.3 Methanol, HPLC grade
3.2.4 Dimethyl formamide, Reagent grade
3.2.5 Desorbing solution is 1 µL/mL dimethyl formamide internal standard in
methanol.
3.3 Sample preparation
3.3.1 Sample tubes are opened and the front and back section of each tube are placed in separate 2-mL vials, and the front glass woll was
placed in the vial containing the front section.
3.3.2 Each section is desorbed with 1 mL of the desorbing solution.
3.3.3 The vials are sealed immediately and allowed to desorb for 30 minutes with occasional shaking.
3.4 Standard preparation
3.4.1 Standards are prepared by diluting a known quantity of OSBP with the desorbing solution.
3.4.2 At least two separate stock standards should be made. Dilutions of the stock standards are prepared to bracket the samples.
For this study standards ranged from 1 to 1198 µg/mL.
3.5 Analysis
3.5.1 Gas chromatograph conditions DB-225 capillary column.
| Flow rates (mL/min) |
|
Temperature (°C) |
| Nitrogen (makeup) |
:30 |
Injector |
: 240 |
| Hydrogen (carrier) |
:1.5 |
Detector |
:240 |
| Air |
:450 |
Column |
:110°-1 min |
| Hydrogen (detector) |
:30 |
|
4°C/min-160°C |
| Injection size |
:1 µL |
|
|
| Elution time |
:7.827 min |
|
|
| Chromatogram |
:(See Figure 1) |
|
3.5.2 Gas chromatograph conditions DB-1 capillary column.
| Flow rates (mL/min) |
Temperature (°C) |
| Nitrogen (makeup) |
:30 |
Injector |
:220 |
| Hydrogen (carrier) |
:1.5 |
Detector |
:240 |
| Air |
:450 |
Column |
:80°-0 min |
| Hydrogen (detector) |
:30 |
|
10°C/min-220°C |
| Injection size |
1 µL |
|
|
| Elution time |
14.58 min |
|
|
| Chromatogram |
:(See Figure 2) |
|
|
3.5.3 Peak areas are measured by an integrator or other suitable means.
3.6 Interferences (analytical)
3.6.1 Any compound having the general retention time of the analyte or the internal standard used is an interference.
Possible interferences should be listed on the sample data sheet. GC parameters should be adjusted if necessary so these
interferences will pose no problems
3.6.2 Retention time data on a single column is not considered proof of chemical identity. Samples over the target concentration should be
confirmed by GC/Mass Spec or other suitable means.
3.7 Calculations
3.7.1 A curve with area counts versus concentration is calculated from the calibration standards.
3.7.2 The area counts for the samples are plotted with the calibration curve to obtain the concentration of OSBP in solution.
3.7.3 To calculate the concentration of analyte in the air sample the following formulas are used:
| (µg/mL) (desorption volume) |
|
mass of analyte in sample |
|
= |
| (desorption efficiency) |
|
| (mass of analyte in sample) |
|
number of moles of analyte |
|
= |
| molecular weight |
|
(number of moles)
of analyte |
(molar volume)
at 25ºC & 760mm |
= |
volume the analyte will occupy at 25ºC |
| (volume analyte occupies) (106)
* |
|
|
|
= |
ppm |
| (air volume) |
|
|
* All units must cancel.
3.7.4 The above equations can be consolidated to form the following formula.
To calculate the ppm of analyte in the sample based on a 20 liter air sample:
| (µg/mL) (DV) (24.45) (106) |
|
(g) |
|
(mg) |
= |
ppm |
|
X |
|
X |
|
| (20 L)(DE)(MW) |
|
(1000mg) |
|
(1000µg) |
| µg/mL |
= |
concentration of analyte in sample or standard |
| 24.45 |
= |
Molar volume (liters/mole) at 25°C and
760 mm Hg. |
| MW |
= |
Molecular weight |
| DV |
= |
Molecular weight (g/mole) |
| 20 L |
= |
20 liter air sample |
| DE |
= |
Desorption efficiency |
3.7.5 This calculation is done for each section of the sampling tube and
the results added together.
3.8 Safety precautions
3.8.1 All handling of solvents should be done in a hood.
3.8.2 Avoid skin contact with all chemicals
3.8.3 Wear safety glasses, gloves and a lab coat at all times.
4. Recommendations for further study
Collection study should be performed.
 |
| Figure 1. An analytical standard of 300 µg/mL
o-sec-butylphenol in methanol with 1 µL/mL dimethyl formamide internal
standard analyzed on a 30 meter DB-225 capillary column. |
 |
| Figure 2. An analytical standard of 300 µg/mL o-sec-butylphenol
in methanol with 1 µL/mL dimethyl formamide internal standard analyzed on
a 60 miter DB-1 capillary column. |
5. References
5.1 Cummins, K., Method 32, "Phenol and Cresol," Organic Methods Evaluation Branch, OSHA Salt Lake Technical Center, 1986.
5.2 Sax, N., Lewis, R., "Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary," Eleventh Edition, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, 1987, p. 190.
5.2 "Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure
Indices," Fifth Edition, American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists Inc., Cincinnati, OH, 1986 p. 84.
|