|
<<< Back to Sampling and Analytical Methods |
Printing Instructions |
For problems with accessibility in using figures, illustrations and PDFs in this method, please contact
the SLTC at (801) 233-4900. These procedures were designed and tested for internal use by OSHA personnel.
Mention of any company name or commercial product does not constitute endorsement by OSHA. |
Benzyl Acetate
Related Information: Chemical Sampling -
Benzyl Acetate
|
| Method no.: |
PV2124 |
| |
| Control no.: |
T-PV2124-01-0306-CH |
| |
Target concentration:
ACGIH TLV: |
10 ppm (61 mg/m³)
10 ppm (61 mg/m³) |
|
| Procedure: |
Samples are collected by drawing a known volume of air through glass
sampling tubes containing 4-tert-butylcatechol (TBC) coated charcoal.
Samples are extracted with carbon disulfide and analyzed by GC using a
flame ionization detector(FID). |
|
Recommended air volume
and sampling rate: |
100 min at 0.1 L/min (10 L) |
|
| Reliable Quantitation limit: |
52.1 ppb
0.009 mg/m³ |
|
| Status of method: |
Partially evaluated method. This method has been subjected to established evaluation
procedures of the Method Development Team and is presented for information and trial use. |
|
|
| June 2003 |
Yogi C. Shah |
|
Chromatography Team
Industrial Hygiene Chemistry Division
OSHA Salt Lake Technical Center
Salt Lake City UT 84115-1802
|
1. General Discussion
1.1 Background
1.1.1 History
ACGIH TLV for benzyl acetate is 10 ppm (61 mg/m³). This work was performed because no
method was available. Analysis by gas chromatography with a flame ionization detector
was chosen. Charcoal tubes did not give good recovery when 10 L humid air was drawn
thru the tubes, TBC charcoal tubes were selected for better recovery. Carbon disulfide was
selected for the extraction solvent and was found to give an extraction efficiency of 97.3%.
The retention efficiency when 10 L humid air drawn was 94.3% and the storage stability was
98.6% recovery on Day 14.
1.1.2 Toxic effects (This section is for information only and should not be taken as the basis of
OSHA policy.)1
If ingested benzyl acetate can cause gastrointestinal (G.I.) irritation with vomiting and
diarrhea. It also is irritating to skin, eyes and respiratory tract.
1.1.3 Workplace exposure2
Benzyl acetate is used in artificial jasmine and other perfumes, soap perfume, flavoring,
natural and synthetic resins, oils, lacquers, polishes, printing inks and varnish removers.
1.1.4 Physical properties and other descriptive information3, 4
| CAS number: |
140-11-4 |
IMIS4: |
B508 |
| RTECS number: |
AF 5075000:1738 |
molecular weight: |
150.17 |
| melting point: |
-51°C |
boiling point: |
213°C |
| appearance: |
clear liquid |
molecular formula: |
C9H10O2 |
| odor: |
pear like |
flash point: |
102°C (216°F)(cc) |
autoignition
temperature: |
|
density: |
1.05 |
| 460°C |
|
|
| synonyms: |
Acetic acid phenylmethyl ester; acetic acid benzyl ester |
| solubility: |
ether, alcohol |
|
|
| structural formula: |
 |
|
|
This method was evaluated according to the OSHA SLTC “Evaluation Guidelines for Air Sampling Methods
Utilizing Chromatographic Analysis”5. The Guidelines define analytical parameters, specify required laboratory
tests, statistical calculations and acceptance criteria. The analyte air concentrations throughout this method
are based on the recommended sampling and analytical parameters.
1.2 Detection Limit of the Overall procedure (DLOP) and Reliable Quantitation Limit (RQL).
The DLOP is measured as mass per sample and expressed as equivalent air concentrations, based
on the recommended sampling parameters. Ten samplers were spiked with equal descending
increments of analyte, such that the highest sampler loading was 3.2 µg benzyl acetate. This is the
amount spiked on a sampler that would produce a peak approximately 10 times the response for a
sample blank. These spiked samplers were analyzed with the recommended analytical parameters,
and the data obtained used to calculate the required parameters (standard error of estimate and
slope) for the calculation of the DLOP. The slope was 1997 and the SEE was 104.2. The RQL is
considered the lower limit for precise quantitative measurements.
It is determined from the regression line parameters obtained for the calculation of the DLOP,
providing 75% to 125% of the analyte is recovered. The DLOP and RQL were 0.157µg and 0.521
µg, respectively.
Table 1.2
Detection Limit of the Overall Procedure
for benzyl Acetate
|
mass per sample
(µg) |
area counts
(µV-s) |
|
0.00
0.32
0.64
0.96
1.28
1.60
1.92
2.24
2.56
2.88
3.20 |
0
809
1366
2189
2816
3429
3969
4523
5142
5836
6522 |
|
|

Figure 1.2.1 Plot of data to determine the DLOP/RQL for benzyl acetate. (Y = 1997X + 95.8) |
Below is chromatogram of the RQL level. |
|

Figure 1.2.2. Chromatogram of the RQL of benzyl acetate. (1, 5, and 6 = impurity; 2 (doublet)= carbon disulfide; 3=
benzene (contaminant in the carbon disulfide); 4 = p-cymene; and 7 = benzyl acetate) |
|
2. Sampling Procedure
All safety practices that apply to the work area being sampled should be followed. The sampling equipment
should be attached to the worker in such a manner that it will not interfere with work performance or safety.
2.1 Apparatus
2.1.1 Samples are collected using a personal sampling pump calibrated, with the sampling device
attached, to within ±5% of the recommended flow rate.
2.1.2 Samples are collected with 7-cm × 4-mm i.d. × 7-mm o.d. glass sampling tubes packed
with two sections (100/50 mg) of TBC Coated charcoal. The sections are held in place and
separated with glass wool plugs. For this evaluation, commercially prepared sampling tubes
were purchased from SKC, Inc. (catalog no. 226-73).
2.2 Reagents
None required.
2.3 Technique
2.3.1 Immediately before sampling, break off the ends of the flame-sealed tube to provide an
opening approximately half the internal diameter of the tube. Wear eye protection when
breaking ends. Use tube holders to minimize the hazard of broken glass. All tubes should
be from the same lot.
2.3.2 The smaller section of the adsorbent tube is used as a back-up and is positioned nearest
the sampling pump. Attach the tube holder to the sampling pump so that the adsorbent
tube is in an approximately vertical position with the inlet facing down during sampling.
Position the sampling pump, tube holder and tubing so they do not impede work
performance or safety.
2.3.3 Draw the air to be sampled directly into the inlet of the tube holder. The air being sampled
is not to be passed through any hose or tubing before entering the sampling tube.
2.3.4 After sampling for the appropriate time, remove the adsorbent tube and seal it with plastic
end caps. Seal each sample end-to-end with an OSHA-21 form as soon as possible.
2.3.5 Submit at least one blank sample with each set of samples. Handle the blank sampler in
the same manner as the other samples except draw no air through it.
2.3.6 Record sample air volumes (liters), sampling time (minutes) and sampling rate (mL/min) for
each sample, along with any potential interferences on the OSHA-91A form.
2.3.7 Submit the samples to the laboratory for analysis as soon as possible after sampling. If
delay is unavoidable, store the samples at refrigerator temperature. Ship any bulk samples
separate from the air samples.
2.4 Extraction efficiency
The extraction efficiency was determined by liquid-spiking TBC Coated charcoal tube with benzyl
acetate at 0.1 to 2 times the target concentration. These samples were stored overnight at ambient
temperature and then extracted for 30 minutes with occasional shaking, and analyzed. The mean
extraction efficiency over the studied range was 97.3%. The wet extraction efficiency was determined
at 1 times the target concentration by liquid spiking the analyte onto TBC Coated charcoal tubes
which had 10 L humid air (absolute humidity of 15.9 mg/L of water, about 80% relative humidity at
22.2°C) drawn through them. The mean recovery for the wet samples was 94.6%.
Table 2.4
Extraction Efficiency (%) of Benzyl Acetate
|
| level |
|
sample number |
|
|
× target
concn |
mg per
sample |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
mean |
|
0.1
0.25
0.5
1.0
2.0
1.0(wet) |
0.06
0.15
0.31
0.61
1.22
0.61 |
97.9
99.1
97.3
97.2
95.8
97.3 |
99.1
98.6
92.7
95.8
95.6
93.9 |
97.9
99.2
98.7
96.5
93.2
93.2 |
99,2
100.2
98.4
100.2
94.8
94.4 |
96.3
99.1
97.3
97.4
96.2
94.2 |
98.1
99.1
96.9
97.4
95.1
94.6 |
|
2.5 Retention efficiency
Six TBC Coated charcoal tubes were spiked with 1.22 mg (20 ppm) of benzyl acetate and allowed
to equilibrate for 6 h. The tubes had 10 L humid air (absolute humidity of 15.9 mg/L of water, about
80% relative humidity at 22.2°C) pulled through them at 0.1 L/min. The samples were extracted and
analyzed. The mean retention recovery was 94.3%. There was no analyte found on the backup
section of any of the tubes.
Table 2.5
Retention Effeciency (%) of Benzyl Acetate
|
|
|
|
sample number |
|
|
|
| section |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
mean |
|
front
rear
total |
94.3
0.0
94.3 |
94.1
0.0
94.1 |
96.8
0.0
96.8 |
93.7
0.0
93.7 |
93.8
0.0
93.8 |
93.1
0.0
93.1 |
94.3
0.0
94.3 |
|
2.6 Sample storage
Nine TBC Coated charcoal tubes were each spiked with 0.61 mg (10.0 ppm) of benzyl acetate. They
were allowed to equilibrate for 6 h, then 10 L of air, with an absolute humidity of 15.7 milligrams of
water per liter of air (about 80% relative humidity at 22.2°C), was drawn through them. Three
samples were analyzed immediately, and the rest were sealed and stored at room temperature.
Three more were analyzed after 7 days of storage and the remaining three after 14 days of storage.
The amounts recovered, which are corrected for retention efficiency, indicate good storage stability
for the time period studied.
Table 2.6
Storage Test for Benzyl Acetate (% Recovery)
|
|
sample number |
|
| time(days) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
mean |
|
0
7
14 |
99.4
99.5
98.3 |
96.9
98.8
98.7 |
96.2
99.7
98.8 |
97.5
99.3
98.6 |
|
2.7 Recommended air volume and sampling rate.
Based on the data collected in this evaluation, 10-L air samples should be collected at a sampling
rate of 0.1 L/min for 100 minutes.
2.8 Interferences (sampling)
2.8.1 There are no known compounds that will severely interfere with the collection of benzyl
acetate.
2.8.2 Suspected interferences should be reported to the laboratory with submitted samples.
3. Analytical Procedure
Adhere to the rules set down in your Chemical Hygiene Plan. Avoid skin contact and inhalation of
all chemicals and review all appropriate MSDSs.
3.1 Apparatus
3.1.1 A gas chromatograph equipped with an FID. For this evaluation, a Hewlett-Packard 6890
Series Gas Chromatograph equipped with a 6890 Automatic Sampler was used.
3.1.2 A GC column capable of separating benzyl acetate from the desorption solvent, internal
standard and any potential interferences. A 60-m × 0.32-mm i.d. capillary STABILWAX with
a 0.5 µm df (Restek Corporation) was used in the evaluation.
3.1.3 An electronic integrator or some other suitable means of measuring peak areas. A Waters
Millennium32 Data System was used in this evaluation.
3.1.4 Glass vials with poly(tetrafluoroethylene)-lined caps. For this evaluation 2-mL vials were
used.
3.1.5 A dispenser capable of delivering 1.0 mL of desorbing solvent to prepare standards and
samples. If a dispenser is not available, a 1.0-mL volumetric pipet may be used.
3.1.7 Volumetric flasks - 10-mL and other convenient sizes for preparing standards.
3.1.8 Calibrated 10-µL syringe for preparing standards.
3.2 Reagents
3.2.1 Benzyl acetate, reagent grade. Aldrich 99% (lot 08515DS) was used in this evaluation.
3.2.2 Carbon disulfide, reagent grade. Omni-Solv 99.99% (lot 34279) was used for this
evaluation.
3.2.3 p-Cymene, reagent grade. Aldrich 99% (lot 11703TR) was used in this evaluation.
3.2.4 The extraction solvent was 0.25 µL/mL p-cymene in carbon disulfide.
3.2.5 GC grade nitrogen, air, and hydrogen.
3.3 Standard preparation
3.3.1 Prepare working analytical standards by injecting micro liter amounts of benzyl
acetate into volumetric flasks containing the extraction solvent. An analytical standard at a
concentration of 1.22 mg/mL (1.16 µL/mL) is equivalent to 20.0 ppm based on a 10-liter air volume.
3.3.2 Bracket sample concentrations with working standard concentrations. If sample
concentrations are higher than the concentration range of prepared standards, prepare and
analyze additional standards, at least as high a concentration as the highest sample, to
ascertain the linearity of response, or dilute the sample with extracting solvent to obtain a
concentration within the existing standard range. The range of standards used in this study
was from 0.00032 to 1.22 mg/mL.
3.4 Sample preparation
3.4.1 Remove the plastic end caps from the sample tubes and carefully transfer the adsorbent
sections to separate 2-mL vials. Discard the glass tube and glass wool plug.
3.4.2 Add 1.0 mL of extraction solvent to each vial using the same dispenser as used for
preparation of standards.
3.4.3 Immediately seal the vials with poly(tetrafluoroethylene)-lined caps.
3.4.4 Shake the vials vigorously by hand several times during the next 30 minutes.
3.5 Analysis
3.5.1 Analytical conditions
GC conditions
|
|

Figure 3.5.1 A chromatogram of 610 µg/mL benzyl acetate in carbon disulfide with 0.25 µL/mL p-cymene internal
standard. Key: (1) and (2) carbon disulfide; (3) benzene contaminant in the carbon disulfide; (4) p-cymene; (5) benzyl
acetate. |
| Injector: |
250°C |
| Detector: |
250°C |
| run time: |
14 min |
| column gas flow: |
2.5 mL/min
(hydrogen) |
| septum purge: |
1.9 mL/min
(hydrogen) |
| injection size: |
1.0 µL (15:1 split) |
| column: |
60-m × 0.32-mm i.d. capillary STABILWAX (0.5-µm df) |
retention times: |
2.53 min (carbon disulfide); 2.81 min (benzene contaminate in the
carbon disulfide); 4.68 min (p-cymene); 8.41 min (benzyl acetate) |
FID conditions
|
|
|
| hydrogen flow: |
38 mL/min |
|
| air flow: |
450 mL/min |
|
| makeup flow: |
50 mL/min (nitrogen) |
|
3.5.2 Peak areas are measured by an
integrator or other suitable means.
3.5.3 An internal standard (ISTD) calibration
method is used. A calibration curve can be constructed by plotting ISTD-corrected response
of standard injections versus milligrams of analyte per sample. Bracket the samples with
freshly prepared analytical standards over a range of concentrations.

Figure 3.5.3 Calibration curve of Benzyl Acetate.
(Y = 694x - 336) |
3.6 Interferences (analytical)
3.6.1 Any compound that produces a GC response and has a similar retention
time as the analyte is a potential interference. If any potential
interferences were reported, they should be considered before
samples are extracted. Generally, chromatographic conditions can be
altered to separate an interference from the analyte.

Figure 3.6.1 The mass spectrum of benzyl acetate. |
3.6.2 When necessary, the identity or purity of an analyte peak may be
confirmed by mass spectrometry or by another analytical procedure. The
mass spectrum in Figure 3.6.2 was from the NIST spectral library.
3.7 Calculations
The amount of analyte per sampler is obtained from the appropriate calibration curve in terms of
micrograms per sample, uncorrected for extraction efficiency. This total amount is then corrected
by subtracting the total amount (if any) found on the blank. The air concentration is calculated using
the following formulas.
|
|
where: |
CM is concentration by weight (mg/m³)
M is micrograms per sample
V is liters of air sampled
EE is extraction efficiency, in decimal form |
|
|
where: |
CV is concentration by volume (ppm)
VM is molar volume at 25°C and 1 atm = 24.46
CM is concentration by weight
Mr is molecular weight = 150.17 |
4. Recommendations for Further Study
Several other tests need to be performed to make this a validated method.
1. The Merck Index, 11th Edition Merck & Co..Inc .Rawhay, N.J. 1989, p 176.
2. The Condensed Chemical Dictionary, Thirteenth Ed. Gessner G. Hawley. Von Nostrand Reinhold: New York, 1997, p 129.
3. The Condensed Chemical Dictionary, Thirteenth Ed. Gessner G. Hawley. Von Nostrand Reinhold: New York, 1997, p 129.
4. OSHA Chemical Sampling Guide, http://www.osha.gov/dts/chemicalsampling/toc/toc_chemsamp.html (01/05/2003 accessed)
5. Burright, D.; Chan, Y.; Eide, M.; Elskamp, C.; Hendricks, W.; Rose, M. C. Evaluation Guidelines for Air Sampling
Methods Utilizing Chromatographic Analysis; OSHA Salt Lake Technical Center, U.S. Department of Labor: Salt Lake City,
UT, 1999.
|
| |
|