<<
Back to Region X
Idaho Construction General Contractor/Construction Manager Partnership Renewal Agreement October 1, 2001
U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration
1150 North Curtis Rd, Suite 201
Boise, Idaho 83706
Telephone: (208) 321-2960 or 1-800-482-1370
Fax: (208) 321-2966
BOISE AREA OFFICE INSTRUCTION CPL 2.1.1A
October 1, 2001
SUBJECT: Idaho Construction General Contractor/Construction Manager
Partnership Program
- Purpose.
This Instruction provides the background
and procedures for a local emphasis partnership program for Idaho General
Contractors and Construction Managers.
- Scope.
This Instruction applies to the Boise Area
Office.
- Cancellation.
Boise Area Office Instruction CPL
2.1.1, dated July 1, 1996.
- References.
- Boise Area Office Instruction CPL 2.1.2 Idaho
Construction Specialty Trades Partnership Program.
- OSHA Instruction CPL 2.102 Procedures for Experimental
Programs.
- OSHA Instruction CPL 2.103 Field Inspection Reference
Manual (FIRM).
- OSHA Instruction CPL 2.25I Scheduling system for
Programmed Inspections, paragraph B.1.a(2(b)4.
- OSHA Instruction STD 3-1.1 Citation Policy Regarding 29
CFR 1926.20, 29 CFR 1926.21 and Related General Safety and Health Provisions,
Appendix A.
- Policy Memorandum dated August 22, 1994 for Regional
Administrators from James W. Stanley, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Subject:
Guidance to Compliance Officers for Programed Construction Inspection,
Construction Safety Referral Inspections, and Construction Fatality or Complaint
Inspections (FOCUSED Inspections).
- OSHA’s Safety and Health Program Management Guidelines
published in the Federal Register dated January 26, 1989.
- ANSI A10.38-1991 Safety and Health Program Guidelines.
- Action.
The Boise Area Office will carry out the
project following the procedures described in this instruction.
- Background.
On July 1, 1996, the Boise Area Office initiated the Idaho Construction
Targeting and Partnership Project for general contractors and construction
managers (noted in paragraph C above). The partnership has led to significant
improvements in more effective safety and health programs at construction sites
managed by the general contractors/construction managers who partnered with
OSHA. An important aspect of the contractor’s safety and health program under
the partnership has been the worksite audits they conduct, in which they
identify violations of OSHA workplace standards at the site and get them
corrected. The Idaho construction contractor partnership program has been a
popular one and has served to highlight both employers’ ability and willingness
to effectively manage workplace safety and health, and OSHA’s willingness to
support that effort. In addition to improvements in the partnered contractors’
programs and those of their subcontractors, OSHA has observed many contractors
who are striving to improve their safety and health programs with the goal of
becoming a partner. The diligence and hard work of the partnered contractors,
and the overall positive response from the construction industry, are believed
to have contributed directly to the significant reduction in Idaho construction
injuries and fatalities over the last several years. The fatality rate over the
last five years has been cut in half, and the total worker’s compensation cases
filed over the past 5 years has been reduced by 10 percentage points. And, from
July 31, 1999 to May 8, 2001, the construction industry in the State of Idaho
did not experience any construction related fatalities. OSHA, as well as the
partnered general contractor construction managers feel that continuing this
partnership program is in the best interest of construction employees, general
contractors/construction managers and OSHA.
- Goals and Objectives.
This project promotes
contractor partnerships with OSHA under which contractors must adhere to strict
requirements for managing site safety and health, and demonstrate this in
advance to OSHA through a comprehensive written program and effective site
enforcement. The Area Office will also verify that partnership requirements are
met and program goals are being attained, by reviewing evidence of regular and
effective safety audits, accident investigations and injury/illness data. The
project goals are:
- To continue to reduce construction worker injuries and
illnesses in Idaho through OSHA inspection actions and through development of
effective partnerships with qualifying general contractors/construction manger
under this program and for qualifying specialty contractors under reference D.1.
- To continue to improve employer safety and health
programs.
- To better utilize Boise Area Office resources by using a
partnership tool to reduce the need for some on-site visits, while still
achieving worker safety and health.
- Provide maximum leverage of inspection resources by
promoting more active employer action and responsibility in safety and health
management.
- Selection of Partnership Contractors for OSHA Inspection:
- Programmed inspections - general. The selection of partnership companies for
programmed OSHA inspections will be made from the standard construction planning
guide list developed for programmed construction inspections. However, because
partnership contractors have committed to conduct regular safety audits to
enforce safety and health requirements at the site, the Area Office will conduct
fewer programmed inspections among partnership contractors than if they were not
making the partnership commitment. While all non-partnership companies that
appear on a list will be inspected, only one in every five partner companies
will be selected.
- Development of programmed inspection lists. The lists will be developed in
accordance with OSHA Instruction CPL 2.25I and the construction project
information system of the Construction Resource Analysis (CRA) Group at the
University of Tennessee. The number of sites selected for a monthly construction
planning guide inspection list is usually about 15 per month. This number can be
raised or lowered depending upon other priorities and resources.
- Selection of sites from the lists. The sites on the construction planning
guide list will be arranged to place the non-partnership contractors first,
followed by those companies that have entered into a successful partnership with
the Boise Area Office. Once an inspection list is opened, all non-partnership
sites must be inspected and every fifth (5th) partnership company. The count of
partnership companies made to identify every fifth one is a running or
continuous count that carries over from list to list.
- Scope of programmed partner inspections. Inspections of partner sites will be
conducted as a focused inspection as directed in reference D.6, with a review on
fall hazards, struck-by hazards, caught by/pinched by hazards, trenching and
excavation hazards, and electrical hazards. If the Compliance Safety and Health
Officer (CSHO) determines during the walkaround that the number or the nature of
hazards found on the project indicates that the safety program is inadequate or
is not effectively implemented, the scope of the inspection will be expanded.
The CSHO will not be required to review the written programs prior to conducting
a focused inspection. A partnership contractor is subject to citations in
accordance with the agency’s policy as described in reference D.3. However,
“Other-than-serious” violations identified and corrected during the inspection
and verified as abated by the CSHO, will not be cited.
- Complaints, fatalities and catastrophes. Fatalities, catastrophes and formal
complaints (signed by a current employee) will be inspected in accordance with
reference D.3. This partnership grants no special provision with regard to
inspections initiated as the result of a fatality, catastrophic event, or a
formal complaint. Non-formal complaints will normally be handled by phone and
FAX.
- Referrals. The area director or his designee will determine on a case-by-case
basis the response to be taken on referrals of saefy and health hazards made by
law enforcement, fire departments, emergency response agencies, safety and
health professionals, and the media. The Boise Area Office may conduct an
on-site inspection in accordance with reference D.3, or it may investigate the
matter by requiring that the employer promptly review and respond formally to a
description of the hazards provided by OSHA in a phone call and FAXed letter.
- Inspection Protocol and Citation policy: Inspections list will be conducted
in accordance with guidance provided in OSHA Instructions CPL 2.103, CPL 2.25I,
STD 3-1.1 and the Policy Memorandum dated August 22, 1994 (references D.3 to D.6
of this instruction). Nothing in the partnership program exempts the general
contractor/construction manager from their obligation to control the site and to
promptly remove employees at the site from safety and health hazards. The
general contractor/construction manager may be subject to citation in accordance
with the agency's multi-employer citation policy outlined in paragraph D.3 of
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.103.
- General Eligibility.
- Business age. The company must have been in business for
three or more years.
- Insurance Mod Rate. In general, the company’s most recent
industrial insurance experience modification rate factor must be 1.0 or less. A
copy of the most recent mod rate notice must be provided when applying to the
partnership program.
- Exception. Companies with a mod rate that exceeds 1.0
will be considered if the modification is being driven by a single loss greater
than $5,000 which occurred in the last four years, and, the company’s most
recent calendar year lost work day injury/illness (LWDII) rate at or below the
most current rate for the type of construction published by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics. The most recent published rate is for CY 1999, and is 3.7 lost
workday injuries/illnesses per 100 workers for general building contractors and
3.8 for heavy construction.
An employer’s LWDII rate for the most recently ended calendar year, is
calculated as follows1:
- Review the appropriate OSHA-200 log to assure that the entries in columns 2
and 9 correctly include all the injuries/illnesses that involve days away from
work or days of restricted work activity.
-Add columns 2 and 9 to obtain the total number of lost workday injuries and
illnesses.
-Calculate the total number of hours worked during the calendar year by all
employees (omitting paid hours that are not hours worked, such as sick and
vacation hours).
lwdii rate = total of columns 2 & 9 multiplied by 200,000
the number of hours worked.
Note: multiplying by 200,000–the full-time equivalent workhours of 100
workers, is necessary to produce a rate of injuries/illness per 100 workers.
- OSHA Citation History. OSHA will review the employer’s
citation history in both Federal OSHA states and in State Plan states (e.g.,
Oregon and Washington). Employers who have received an OSHA citation classified
as “Willful” or Failure-to-Abate” which became a final order within the last
three years, are not eligible for the partnership. Employers who have received a
“Repeat” violation or a “High-Gravity Serious” violation in the same period may
apply, but may be deemed ineligible at the discretion of the Boise Area
Director, following his office’s review of the nature of the violation. Those
employers may re-apply three years after the final order date of such a
violation.
- Partnership Application and On-Site Evaluation,
Candidates for a partnership with OSHA will complete a copy of the
Self-Evaluation Questionnaire included as Appendix A of this instruction,
provide a copy of their current safety and health programs and provide a list of
construction sites that will be active during the next 90 days.
- Written Safety and Health Programs. The general
contractor/construction manager applying for the partnership program must have
written safety and health programs, and must provide a copy of these programs
with the application.
- Self-Evaluation Questionnaire. Appendix A is a
self-evaluation questionnaire that employers are to complete to evaluate their
safety and health programs. This self-evaluation serves as the partnership
program application, and employers should complete the document, certify that
the information is true and correct to the best of the employer’s knowledge, and
provide it to OSHA.
The employer may, at his discretion, have his safety and health programs and the
self-evaluation questionnaire reviewed in advance by another party such as a
safety consultant, employer association or insurance carrier. This will not
affect the level of OSHA’s review.
- Site Visit. The employer is to provide a list of
construction sites that will be active during the next 90 days. OSHA will select
a site and conduct an evaluation inspection to determine if the employer’s
safety and health program is operating effectively and meets the partnership
qualifications. The visit will be recorded as a partial scope OSHA inspection.
- Requirements for partnership:
A partnership is a
written agreement under which the contractor makes a commitment to maintain an
effective comprehensive written safety and health program and conducts regular
safety audits to enforce safety and health requirements at the site. In return,
the Area Office will provide safety and health program advice and support and
will conduct fewer programmed inspections among partnership contractors than if
they were not making the partnership commitment.
NOTE: Nothing in the partnership program exempts the general
contractor/construction manager from their obligation to control the site and to
promptly remove employees at the site from safety and health hazards. The
general contractor/construction manager may be subject to citation in accordance
with the agency's multi-employer citation policy outlined in paragraph D.3 of
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.103.
- Requirement for Written Safety and Health Program:
General Contractors must have a written safety and health program. The program
will be reviewed by the Boise Area Office staff before the partnership is
approved. The evaluation of this program will be in accordance with the
guidelines in OSHA Instruction STD 3-1.1, as well as the guidelines listed
below. The Self-Evaluation Questionnaire provided as Appendix A is to be
prepared and submitted by the general contractor/ construction manager and will
be reviewed by the OSHA representative. The OSHA representative will make any
appropriate comments or recommendations based upon their document review and a
site audit.
- Training Requirements for Managers: All job site
supervisors and foremen of a partnered general contractor/construction manager
will receive the OSHA 10 hour construction course or equivalent training.
Equivalent training will vary for each construction activity and for the scope
of a supervisor or foreman duties. Training provided in-house will often exceed
the scope of the training provided by the OSHA 10-hour course. Equivalent
training should include accident prevention training which has been tailored to
the scope of the supervisor or foremen duties.
- Training Requirements for Employees: Employees will be
trained in hazard recognition, OSHA standards, company safety policies and
employee rights and responsibilities under the OSH Act of 1970. The guidance for
this training will be the OSH Act, OSHA regulations, OSHA Pamphlet 3021 -
“Employee Workplace Rights,” and any other training material/guidelines deemed
appropriate by the general contractor/construction manager. The goal of this
training is to ensure that employees and employers work together to reduce
workplace hazards. In addition, 25% of the non-management employees should
complete the OSHA 10-hour construction course or be provided equivalent training
as discussed above under Supervisory Training.
- Site Safety Audits: Site management will conduct an
informal site audit daily by focusing on fall hazards, struck-by hazards,
caught-in/between hazards, electrical hazards, and trenching and excavation
hazards. They will also include other areas of high hazard when appropriate,
such as but not limited to confined spaces and chemical hazards. Where serious
hazards are noted during the informal site audit, they will be appropriately
documented. On at least a weekly basis, a documented inspection of the work site
will be conducted by a person competent in the safety and health issues
applicable to the job at its current stage of construction.
- Subcontractor Enforcement: General
contractors/construction managers will establish an effective policy for dealing
with non-complying sub-contractors. The general contractor/construction manager
will document hazards with videos or still cameras and keep track of date, time,
exposed employee name(s), and what they did to get the non-complying
sub-contractor to comply and the name(s) of management spoken to. If partnered
company deems that OSHA enforcement action against the subcontractor is the only
way to ensure future compliance, a management representative from the partnered
contractor can make a referral to OSHA. The partnered company must ensure that
the employees are removed from the hazard, and the condition is abated prior to
allowing the employees to return to work, even when the general
contractor/construction manager has elected to notify OSHA.
- Subcontractor Safety and Health Requirements: Partnership
companies will agree to maintain a copy of the subcontractor's safety and health
plan, hazard communication program, and fall protection plan. The general
contractor/construction manager can require all subcontractors to follow their
programs in lieu of individual subcontractor plans.
- Annual Reporting. The partner general
contractor/construction manager will complete and provide an annual report to
OSHA on or before February 15 each year so that OSHA can evaluate the program
and can determine whether the contractor continues to qualify for partnership.
Appendix B is the format for the report. Partner companies must review report
topics in advance, to be sure that they are maintaining the information needed
for year-end reporting.
- Partnership Banner. General contractors/construction
managers who partner with OSHA may display a sign or banner at their
construction sites advertising their partnership. They may also advertise the
partnership on company letterhead or on information sheets submitted with bid
proposals.
- Outreach:
The Boise Area Office will carry out various outreach activities to introduce
this project and to promote comprehensive employer safety and health programs
through cooperative partnerships with general contractors/construction managers
administered in accordance with this instruction and subcontractors administered
in accordance with reference D.1. Efforts will be made to contact all general
contractors/construction managers that may qualify. These activities may
include:
- Speeches by Boise Area Office staff to the construction
industry on the merits of this program.
- A press release to the Idaho Construction News.
- Enlisting the support and help of various organizations
to promote the awareness of the project. Such organizations shall include, but
not be limited to, The Idaho Construction News, the Associated General
Contractors and the Associated Builders and Contractors.
- Providing safety and health resources/guidance at the
Boise Area Office level to assist employers in the development of effective
safety and health programs.
- Seeking the support of several partner general
contractors/construction managers to offer their support concerning this
project.
- Seeking qualified general contractors/construction
managers who have demonstrated excellent commitment to safety and health to
participate in this program.
- Partnership Agreements and Renewal
- Partnership Agreement. Paragraphs I, J and K of this
instruction identify the eligibility and program requirements for the
partnership, including the requirement for the applicant’s safety and health
program self-evaluation, and the requirement for an annual report. Appendix C
provides a sample copy of the partnership agreement that would be signed by OSHA
and the general contractor/construction manager.
- Renewal. Partnership agreements will require renewal
action every three years. General contractors/ construction managers will be
evaluated by OSHA to assure that they continue to meet the partnership
requirements identified paragraph K. of this instruction. The Boise Area
Director may extend the three year period somewhat if resources to conduct the
renewal evaluation are not immediately available at the three year anniversary.
- Disqualification:
As indicated in paragraph I.4., OSHA will review applicant’s violation history
with OSHA and with State programs (e.g., Oregon-OSHA and Washington’s WISHA) and
may disqualify applicants in advance. In addition, citations received by a
partner contractor subsequent to partnership may result in termination of the
partnership agreement:
- a “Willful” or “Failure-to-Abate” citation received
subsequent to partnership will always result in termination of the partnership
agreement.
- a “Repeat” violation may result in termination of the
partnership, agreement depending on the circumstances of the repeat violation.
- an OSHA inspection resulting in numerous violations or
in high gravity “Serious” violations may also result in termination of the
partnership agreement.
- Recording in OSHA’s Integrated Management Information
System (IMIS):
The activities and hours for this program’s partnership inspection, evaluation
and compliance assistance activities are to be recorded in IMIS using the Local
Emphasis Code IDCON.
- An OSHA 1 Inspection Report will be completed for on-site
evaluation of the partner’s safety and health program, and for all subsequent
inspections. In most cases the scope of the inspection will be ‘partial’. Mark
these as a Local Emphasis Program inspection with the code IDCON in block 25C.
- Program evaluations, discussions, and paper reviews
conducted prior to the site evaluation, and compliance assistance outreach
activities, are to be recorded on an OSHA-55 with the LEP code IDCON (or the
successor compliance assistance Web-form).
- Evaluation of the Project:
By March 15 of each year that this project remains active, an evaluation of the
project shall be conducted by the Boise Area Office.
NOTE: If the project is determined to be ineffective after the above evaluation
it will be discontinued. In this case, the general contractor/construction
manager who has entered into a partnership with OSHA will be formally notified
in writing.
//original signed//
Ryan E. Kuehmichel
Area Director
CONCURRENCE:
//original signed//
Richard S. Terrill
Regional Administrator
APPENDIX A
GENERAL CONTRACTOR/CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
SELF EVALUATION AND APPLICATION/RENEWAL
Auditor Name ________________________________________ Date ______________
Company Name ______________________________________ Tel. # _____________
Physical Address______________________________________ FAX # ____________
City __________________________ State _____________ Zip ______________
Mailing Address __________________________________________________________
City __________________________ State _____________ Zip ______________
Submitted by ___________________ Title _____________ Tel. # ____________
Type of Contractor _________________________________
|
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS |
YES |
NO |
| 1.
Appendix A has been appropriately completed? |
|
|
|
2. A current copy of each safety & health program is attached? |
|
|
3. A list of active construction sites for the next 90 days is attached?
NOTE: The list will contain a project description, estimated date of
completion
and the dollar amount of the project. |
|
|
|
PRE-QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS: |
YES |
NO |
NA |
1.
Have you had a willful citation within the last three years?
If yes, you may not apply at this time. |
|
|
|
2. Have you had a repeat citation within the last three years?
If yes you may apply; however, please attach a brief statement explaining why
this repeat citation should not prevent you from applying. |
|
|
|
3. Have you been in business for three or more years?
If no, you may not apply at this time. |
|
|
|
|
MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT: |
YES |
NO |
NA |
| 1.
Does management participate in the safety program? |
|
|
|
|
2. Does management set objectives for safety? |
|
|
|
|
3. Does management budget for and provide necessary funds? |
|
|
|
4. Does management require feedback on safety program?
NOTE: Management that does not participate in their safety program, has a
hands-off approach, or leaves safety to the safety coordinator or supervisory
personnel fails to meet the minimum acceptable level for management
commitment. |
|
|
|
|
MANAGEMENT POLICY STATEMENT ON SAFETY: |
YES |
NO |
NA |
| 1.
Does a policy exist? |
|
|
|
|
2. Is the policy in writing? |
|
|
|
|
3. Has the policy been explained to all employees? |
|
|
|
|
4. Do all employees know the policy? |
|
|
|
|
5. Does the policy set boundaries for the safety and health program? |
|
|
|
|
6. Does the policy emphasize management’s approach to safety? |
|
|
|
|
7. Is the policy signed by the owner or the president of the company? |
|
|
|
8. Does the policy authorize employees to participate in the company’s safety
and health program?
NOTE: If no policy exists the company fails to meet the minimum acceptable
level for management policy statement on safety. |
|
|
|
|
RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAFETY DEFINED: |
YES |
NO |
NA |
| 1.
Is the responsibility for safety defined for all levels of the company? |
|
|
|
|
2. Is it in writing and made a part of the safety and health manual? |
|
|
|
3. Do operating supervisors have key responsibilities for safety incorporated
in their job descriptions?
NOTE: If the only person who has responsibility for the results of safety
program is the safety coordinator, if the operating supervisors look to the
safety coordinator to perform all safety activities, or the responsibility for
safety has not been defined within the firm the company fails to meet the
minimum acceptable level for responsibility for safety. |
|
|
|
|
EXPERIENCE MODIFICATION RATE (EMR): |
YES |
NO |
NA |
| 1.
Is the EMR at 1.0 or below? |
|
|
|
|
2. Is a copy of the insurance document documenting the company’s EMR attached? |
|
|
|
|
SAFETY BUDGET: |
YES |
NO |
NA |
| 1.
Does the contractor have a site specific safety budget established? |
|
|
|
2. Is the budget based on planned activities for the specific project?
NOTE: In order to satisfy this element, the company must allocate funding to
ensure that personal protective equipment is provided and that equipment is
maintained and used in a safe manner. |
|
|
|
|
SAFETY PROGRAM GOAL SETTING: |
YES |
NO |
NA |
1.
Are safety goals and objectives set to be achieved through the safety
program (based on needs or problems)? |
|
|
|
|
2. Are the goals and objectives published? |
|
|
|
|
3. Has a strategy been developed to accomplish the safety program goals? |
|
|
|
|
4. Does the safety program require feedback from those responsible for
achieving safety results? |
|
|
|
|
5. Are results discussed at least annually? |
|
|
|
|
6. Are audits conducted to measure the performance of the goals? |
|
|
|
|
7. Are long term and short term goals considered in the safety program? |
|
|
|
|
MANAGEMENT SUPERVISORY MEETINGS: |
YES |
NO |
NA |
1.
Are meetings held by management with supervisors where safety is on the
agenda? |
|
|
|
|
2. Does management give an overview of safety activities? |
|
|
|
|
3. Is information given to supervisors on safety? |
|
|
|
|
4. Do supervisors give a status report on job site safety activities? |
|
|
|
|
5. Are serious accidents and near misses reviewed in these meetings? |
|
|
|
|
PRE-PLANNING FOR JOB-SITE SAFETY: |
YES |
NO |
NA |
| 1.
Is pre-job safety planning required at the bid stage? |
|
|
|
|
2. Is pre-job safety planning required prior to mobilization for every job? |
|
|
|
|
3. Is a check list used by the supervisor to assure that safety requirements
for the job site are considered? |
|
|
|
|
4. Is necessary equipment provided? |
|
|
|
|
5. Are job supervisors trained in pre-job safety and health planning? |
|
|
|
|
EMPLOYEE PARTICIPATION: |
YES |
NO |
NA |
| 1.
Is an employee participation program in place? |
|
|
|
|
2. Are employees encouraged to participate in activities? |
|
|
|
|
3. Are employees required to participate in: tool box talks, hazard
recognition/reporting, site inspections, new hire & formal safety training? |
|
|
|
|
4. Are employees encouraged to participate in safety rule development/revision
and accident investigations? |
|
|
|
|
5. Is there an employee suggestion/comment program in place? |
|
|
|
|
NEW HIRE ORIENTATION: |
YES |
NO |
NA |
| 1.
Is a formal orientation program in effect for all new or transferred
employees? |
|
|
|
|
2. Are records maintained showing: date, person conducting orientation, areas
covered, and signature of the employee and the person conducting the training? |
|
|
|
|
3. Does the new hire orientation include training on: safety and health rules,
hazard communication, possible safety and health hazard exposure on the job,
emergency reporting procedures, and personal protective equipment? |
|
|
|
|
4. During the new hire orientation, is the company’s disciplinary policy for
violating safety and health rules clearly communicated? |
|
|
|
|
5. Is management concern for safe job performance communicated? |
|
|
|
|
SAFETY RULES: |
YES |
NO |
NA |
| 1.
Are the safety rules published? |
|
|
|
|
2. Does management make all employees aware of the safety rules? |
|
|
|
|
3. Are copies of the rules posted at the work site? |
|
|
|
|
4. Are the safety rules concise and easy to understand? |
|
|
|
|
5. Are rules enforced equally among all employees? |
|
|
|
|
6. Are rules updated on a regular basis? |
|
|
|
|
7. Are safety rules reviewed on annual basis for possible updating? |
|
|
|
|
EMPLOYEE SAFETY TRAINING: |
YES |
NO |
NA |
| 1.
Does management conduct a work force safety training needs assessment? |
|
|
|
2. Is formal safety and health training provided (when required) in the areas
such as, but not limited to:
a) hazard recognition?
b) first aid/CPR?
c) hazard communication and material safety data sheets?
d) fall protection?
e) confined space entry?
f) safe equipment operation?
g) industrial truck operations?
h) electrical safety?
i) lockout/tagout ?
j) personal protective equipment?
k) trade speciality safety and health?
|
|
|
|
3. Is there documentation that training is provided? If yes, does it show:
a) date?
b) signature of person conducting the training?
c) qualification of the person conducting the training?
d) areas covered?
e) signature of the employee?
|
|
|
|
|
4. Is employee training comprehension/understanding of training verified and
documented? |
|
|
|
|
SAFETY TOOL BOX MEETINGS: |
YES |
NO |
NA |
| 1.
Are meetings held at least weekly? |
|
|
|
|
2. Are these meetings conducted by a supervisor? |
|
|
|
|
3. Are records kept showing attendance and topics presented? |
|
|
|
|
4. Do employees participate in the meetings? |
|
|
|
|
5. Are employees asked to present safety topics at the meetings? |
|
|
|
|
INSPECTIONS: |
YES |
NO |
NA |
| 1.
Are job site inspections conducted daily? |
|
|
|
|
2. Are these inspections conducted by a site supervisor? |
|
|
|
|
3. During these inspections are critical safety items identified and checked? |
|
|
|
|
4. Are safety and health deficiencies documented? |
|
|
|
|
5. When possible, are safety and health deficiencies corrected immediately? |
|
|
|
|
6. When safety and health deficiencies are not corrected immediately, are
interim controls initiated to ensure no employee exposure to the hazard? |
|
|
|
|
SUPERVISORY TRAINING: |
YES |
NO |
NA |
| 1.
Does the company provide supervisory training? |
|
|
|
|
2. Are all levels of supervisors trained? |
|
|
|
|
3. Are supervisors trained in first aid/CPR? |
|
|
|
|
4. Are supervisors trained in hazard recognition? |
|
|
|
|
5. Are supervisors trained in emergency reporting procedures? |
|
|
|
|
6. Do supervisors receive the OSHA 10 hour or 30 hour construction course? |
|
|
|
|
7. Are supervisors (when required) trained in respiratory protection? |
|
|
|
|
8. Are supervisors (when required) trained in confined space entry? |
|
|
|
|
9. Are supervisors (when required) trained in scaffold safety? |
|
|
|
|
10. Are supervisors (when required) trained in ladder safety? |
|
|
|
|
11. Are supervisors (when required) trained in trench and excavation safety? |
|
|
|
|
12. Are supervisors (when required) trained in monitoring the atmosphere for
toxic, flammable mixtures, and/or oxygen levels? |
|
|
|
13. Are supervisors (when required) trained in fall protection requirements?
|
|
|
|
14. Is there documentation that training is provided?
If yes, does it show:
a) date?
b) signature of person conducting the training?
c) qualification of the person conducting the training?
d) areas covered?
e) signature of the employee?
|
|
|
|
|
ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION: |
YES |
NO |
NA |
| 1.
Are all accidents and near misses immediately investigated? |
|
|
|
|
2. Are reports completed on all accidents and near misses? |
|
|
|
|
3. Does the owner, president or other corporate officer review the accident
investigation report? |
|
|
|
|
4. Does management try to determine the cause of the accident? |
|
|
|
5. Does the accident investigation focus on what deficiency in the company’s
safety and health program may have allowed this accident to occur, i.e.,
management commitment, hazard identification/determination, hazard
elimination/control, emergency response planning, first aid/medical, or
training?
NOTE: Simply stating it was an unsafe act by the employee or unsafe condition
does not meet the requirements for this element. If it is an unsafe condition,
what element of your program allowed it to exist or be created? If it is an
unsafe act, why did the employee perform this unsafe act. Was he or she not
trained, or was it employee misconduct? If it was employee misconduct, what
disciplinary actions were taken? |
|
|
|
|
6. Is there a follow-up system in place to assure corrective action has been
taken to prevent another similar accident? |
|
|
|
|
7. Is the information learned from an accident shared with all other job sites
to help prevent further accidents? |
|
|
|
|
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE): |
YES |
NO |
NA |
| 1.
Does the company conduct an analysis to determine the PPE requirements? |
|
|
|
|
2. Is the employee informed on what PPE is required? |
|
|
|
|
3. Are employees trained in the use and maintenance of the PPE? |
|
|
|
|
4. Does the company provide the PPE? |
|
|
|
|
5. Has the employee been made aware of disciplinary consequences for not using
the required PPE? |
|
|
|
|
SUBSTANCE ABUSE POLICY: |
YES |
NO |
NA |
| 1.
Does the company have a policy regarding drug or alcohol abuse? |
|
|
|
|
2. Are supervisors trained in the hazards of drugs and alcohol on the job? |
|
|
|
|
3. Is drug testing conducted for pre-hire, post accident, and cause? |
|
|
|
|
RECORD KEEPING: |
YES |
NO |
NA |
1.
Does the company (when required) maintain an OSHA 200 log of injuries and
illnesses?
NOTE: Use OSHA Forms 300 and 300A beginning with calendar year 2002 |
|
|
|
2. Does the company maintain an OSHA 101 or equivalent workers compensation
form for the first report of the injury?
NOTE: Use OSHA Form 301 or equivalent beginning with calendar year 2002 |
|
|
|
|
3. Does the company maintain accident investigations? |
|
|
|
|
4. Does the company maintain records of the hazards noted during self
inspections? |
|
|
|
|
5. Does the company maintain copies of written reports they have made on
multi- employer job sites concerning hazards that were not created by your
company? |
|
|
|
|
6. Were the reports above forwarded to the creating and controlling employers? |
|
|
|
7. Are cranes used on the construction site?
If yes, are the following records must be maintained for each crane on site:
o) Is a copy documenting a thorough annual inspection by either a
competent person or a person recognized by the U.S. Department of Labor
maintained on site?
p) Are copies of the daily to monthly inspections maintained on site?
q) Is a copy of the operators and maintenance manual maintained on site for
each crane in service?
|
|
|
|
-Appendix B-
ANNUAL REPORT
FOR
IDAHO GENERAL CONTRACTOR/CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PARTNERSHIP PROJECT
DUE BY 15 FEBRUARY EACH YEAR
1, Company name submitting this report: ________________
15. This report is for calendar year: ________________
15. Have you had any lost time accidents, property damage YES NO NA
exceeding $5,000 or near misses?
15. List the name of the company(s) involved in these incidents:
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
15. If your answer to question number 3 is yes, have you attached a
copy of each accident investigation? YES NO NA
15. Transfer the previous year’s summary totals from your OSHA 200
log to the following table:
OSHA 200 LOG
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOURS WORKED IN PREVIOUS YEAR: _______________
15. Insurance Experience Modification Rate: _______________
15. Number of sites audited during the previous year: _______________
15. Number of audits conducted during the previous year: _______________
15. Number of violations found by your audits during the _______________
previous year:
15. Number of subcontractors who worked for you during the ______________
previous year:
15. Top three reoccurring violations corrected during the previous year:
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
15. Non-compliance letters were issued to the following contractors
during the previous year:
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
15. Warning were given to the following contractors during the
previous year:
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
15. The following contractors were shut down due to safety and
health violation during the previous year:
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
15. The following contractors were removed from the site for safety
and health violations during the previous year:
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________ _______________
Signature Date
APPENDIX C
PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNDERSIGNED
GENERAL CONTRACTOR/CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND OSHA
The undersigned parties mutually agree to the goals and objectives described
in paragraph F of this instruction. We are committed to employee safety and
health through the proper implementation of this agreement. The undersigned
parties agree to operate within the scope of this instruction. The undersigned
general contractor agrees to meet the requirements of paragraph H of this
instruction to qualify for a partnership.
The undersigned parties understand that this agreement can be canceled by either
party by written notice (in accordance with paragraph J of this instruction). In
addition, the undersigned parties understand that this agreement will require
renewal action every three years (in accordance with paragraph J of this
instruction). The undersigned general contractor is aware of the
disqualification clause specified in paragraph M of this instruction.
General Contractor: Union (if applicable): OSHA Area Director:
______________________ __________________________ ________________________
Date: __________ Expiration date: __________
1For 2002 rates and thereafter: OSHA has replaced the OSHA-200 log
effective January 1, 2002 with a revised form OSHA 300 and 300A. Accordingly,
when calculating the lwdii rate from injuries and illnesses recorded on the 300
forms, use the total of columns H and I in lieu of columns 2 and 9.
|