By Andrew B. Cecala1, Robert J. Timko2, and Alexander D Prokop3
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bruce Babbitt, Secretary

BUREAU OF MINES
Rhea Lydia Graham, Director
International Standard Serial Number
ISSN 1066-5552
|
|
CONTENTS
Abstract
Introduction
Background
Testing equipment and procedures
Evaluation site 1
Testing
Results
Evaluation site 2
Testing
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
Appendix. Test Results
ILLUSTRATIONS
-
Respirable quartz exposure by occupation in mineral processing facilities for 1988-92
-
Schematic of B&BCD
-
Test layout of evaluation site 1
-
Gravimetric dust concentrations with and without B&BCD at evaluation site 1
-
Reduction in RAM-1 dust concentrations with B&BCD at evaluation site 1
-
Product removed from exterior of bags with and without the B&BCD at evaluation site 1
-
Test layout of evaluation site 2
-
Increase in dust concentrations inside B&BCD at evaluation site 2
-
Reduction in RAM-1 dust concentrations with B&BCD device at evaluation site 2
-
Dust liberated from squeezing process of palletizer unit at evaluation site 2
-
Product removed from exterior of bags with and without B&BCD at evaluation site 2
TABLES
A-1. Gravimetric results at field evaluation site 1: Normal system
A-2. Gravimetric results at field evaluation site 1: B&BCD
A-3. Results of RAM-1 dust monitor at site a sample locations
A-4.
Plant 1: Vacuum testing of bags to determine reduction in product on outside of bags
A-5.
Site 2: Results of RAM-1 dust monitor at sample locations
| UNIT OF MEASURE ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS REPORT |
| |
| Metric Units |
| A |
Ampere |
m3/s |
cubic meter per second |
| g |
gram |
min |
minute |
| kg |
kilogram |
mg/m3 |
milligram per cubic meter |
| kPa |
kilopascal |
mg/min |
milligram per minute |
| L/min |
liter per minute |
mm |
millimeter |
| m |
meter |
µm |
micrometer |
| m3/min |
cubic meter per minute |
µg/m3 |
microgram per cubic meter |
| |
| U.S. Customary Units |
| cfm |
cubic foot per minute |
psi |
pound per square inch |
| ft |
foot |
scfm |
standard cubic foot per minute |
| lb |
pound |
V |
volt |
| pct |
percent |
|
|
ABSTRACT
The U.S. Bureau of Mines has designed and tested a
system called the Bag and Belt Cleaner Device (B&BCD) to reduce dust
levels in and around the bag conveying and stacking process. The
device physically cleans either 22.7 kg (50 lb) or 45.4 kg (100 lb) paper
bags by using a combination of bushes and air jets. It is completely
self-contained and is kept under negative pressure by a baghouse to ensure
that dust and product removed from the bags during cleaning does not flow
into the work environment and contaminate workers. The bags travel
through the device on a chain conveyor, which permits any product or dust
cleaned from the bags to fall into a hopper at the bottom of the device
and be recycled back into the process via a screw conveyor. Once
exiting the B&BCD, the outside of the bags and the conveyor are
essentially product and dust free.
The B&BCD was evaluated at two mineral
processing plants to determine reductions with the device in use.
The results of both field evaluations showed that the amount of product
removed from the outside of the bags varied from 77 to 93 pct.
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this study was to determine a cost-effective way to
lower respirable dust levels in and around the bag-stacking function at
mineral processing operations. In mineral processing facilities, the
bag loading and stacking processes are the highest dust exposure job
categories in the metal/nonmetal mining industry.
Figure 1
shows the
respirable quartz exposure level of different job classifications at
mineral processing facilities; the highest worker exposures are for bag
operators and bag stackers.4
The U.S. Bureau of Mines (USBM) has worked on
several different research projects to reduce worker exposure during bag
stacking. One study dealt with lowering dust concentrations when
loading bags on wooden pallets within enclosed railcars or trailer trucks.
A flexible snake conveyor expedited the stacking of bags inside these
vehicles. Individuals working in the vehicles, referred to as
"stackers," were exposed to extremely high respirable dust
concentrations during this palletizing process. At times, respirable
dust concentrations were 40 to 50 times higher than the worker's threshold
limit value (TLV) for the workday. The dust generated inside these
enclosed vehicles during the bag-stacking process was not exiting the
vehicle or being diluted with fresh air. The USBM examined various
methods to effectively ventilate these vehicles and thus lower respirable
dust concentrations. The goal was to remove the dust generated
during the bag-stacking process and to keep it from contaminating the
workers while being exhausted from the vehicle. The most effective
design was a system built onto the flexible snake conveyor that was
retreated from the vehicle as it was being loaded. The inlet to the
exhaust system extended beyond the loading area and pulled dust toward the
front of the vehicle and away from the bag stackers. A small exhaust
port was also located at the last transfer pint to capture the dust
liberated at this locations. Respirable dust concentrations were
reduced between 65 and 95 pct in and around the bag-stacking location
using this system (1)5.
The USBM also developed an effective method to lower
dust levels at conventional pallet loading operations; those sites where
the pallet loading process is always performed at the exact same location.
When a pallet is fully loaded, a fork lift carries it away. The
cycle is then repeated by positioning a new pallet in the same locations
as the previous one. The USBM performed an in-depth laboratory
analysis investigating various ventilation methods to minimize the bag
stacker's dust exposure. The final design used a push-pull
ventilation technique to capture dust generated during bag stacking.
A low-volume, high-velocity blower system operating at approximately 4.3 m3/min
(150 cfm) generated a stream of air over the top layer of bags on the
pallet. As this air stream traveled across the top of the stacked
bags, it entrained dust generated during the bag-stacking process.
The exhaust ventilation system pulled approximately 70.8 m3/min
(2,500 cfm) of air and dust through the exhaust hood. This exhaust
air was filtered through a baghouse or another device before being
discharged outside the mill. There was a 70-pct reduction in the bag
stacker's dust exposure during laboratory testing and a 76-pct reduction
at the first field evaluation. This system has proven itself to be
effective and reliable from a dust control, ergonomic, and production
standpoint(2).
The previous research looked at specific types of
pallet loading applications and investigated effective techniques to
control the dust generated at these locations. The intent of the
current research is to clean both the bags and the belt before they reach
the bag-stacking location. This reduces the worker's respirable dust
exposure regardless of the bag-stacking method used.
When this work was initiated, an in-depth literature
search was performed to determine existing research and technology in this
area. There was a significant amount of work performed on conveyor
cleaning techniques (3-5). This previous research was
beneficial in evaluating different methods for cleaning the bags of
product.
This research was aimed at designing a system that
would have wide application and could be used regardless of the stacking
method or location. The B&BCD was designed to be placed in-line
between the bag loading and the bag-stacking process. The system was
able to handle paper bags between 22.7kg (50lb) and 45.4 kg (100 lb), but
with minor modifications, it could probably handle most bag sizes.
Product removed or cleaned from the bags and belt is collected in a hopper
at the bottom of the device and recycled back into the process
periodically via a screw conveyor. By removing the product and dust
from the exterior of the bags and the conveyor belt, dust liberation is
greatly reduced while the bags are transported to the bag-stacking
location. The ultimate goal of this research was to improve the
health of workers by reducing respirable dust concentrations during the
bag-stacking process. Dust exposure is reduced for the bag stacker,
other workers in and around the area, as well as the end user of the
bagged material.
BACKGROUND
In an effort to clean the bags of product material
as they move through the device, the B&BCD uses a combination of both
stationary and rotating brushes, along with air nozzles. The
B&BCD is 3.1m (10ft) long and is installed as part of the belt line.
Figure 2 shows a schematic of the B&BCD. As bags enter the
device, they travel through flexible plastic stripping doors into an air
lock chamber. Inside this air lock is a stationary brush on a swing
arm that starts the cleaning process on the front and top of each bag.
The bag then travels through a second plastic stripping door, exits the
air lock chamber and enters the main section of the device.
Once in the main cleaning chamber, the bag travels
under a rotating circular brush that further cleans the top of the bags.
This brush rotates opposite to the travel direction of the bags, creating
additional friction and improving the cleaning action. The sides of
the bags are cleaned by a stationary brush positioned on each side of the
chamber. An air nozzle was located at the end of each of these
brushes. The bags should always travel through the device with the
valve on the same side. The valve side of the bag is normally
much more contaminated with product than the nonvalve side. This
contamination occurs as product spews from the fill nozzle during the fill
cycle. Because of this contamination, the bag valve side needs more
air to clean the bag than the nonvalve side. On the nonvalve side of
the bag, a flat fan airjet delivered approximately 0.08m3/min
(3.0 scfm) of air. On the valve side of the bag, a plastic airjet
nozzle delivered approximately 0.57 mg/min (20 scfm) of air. This
nozzle effectively removes product from the another portion of the bag
valve area. A dust cloud from the bag valve occurs each time a bag
travels past the nozzle. On the nonvalve side of the bag, the high
volume airjet nozzle was not cost-effective due to the additional expense
of providing pneumatic air.
An air filter cleans all compressed air.
Nozzle air pressure is adjusted with a pressure regulator. The
optimal pressure to operate these nozzles is approximately 276 kPa (40 psi).
The last cleaning process involves the bag traveling
over a rotating circular brush located beneath the bag. In this
case, the brush rotation is in the same direction as the bag movement.
Although the movement is in the same direction as the bags, there is
acceptable cleaning action because the weight of each bag forces it down
on the bristles of the rotating brush. The bag then exits the device
by going through another air lock chamber, again having two sets of
flexible plastic stripping doors.
A chain conveyor is used for the entire length of
the device to allow product removed from the bags to fall into the hopper.
Product cleaned from the bags is recycled back into the process.
Initially, a high pressure air stream released from the slotted device,
known as an air knife, was located at the far side of each of the rotating
brushes to provide additional cleaning and to keep the brushes clean.
These air knives provided very little, additional cleaning over the
rotating brushes and tended to place the device under positive pressure.
Because of this, air knives are not recommended as part of the B&BCD.
The B&BCD is a self-contained system with three
hookup requirements. The first is 440 V, three-phase electrical
power. The device is protected by a 30-A breaker and requires
approximately of A of current during normal operation. The second
requirement is compressed air. Compressed air powers two air jets
and two pneumatic cylinders. The two air nozzles need approximately
0.65 m3/min of compressed air at 276 kPa. A minimum quantity of air is
necessary to periodically change the spacing of the stationary side
brushes for 22.7 or 45.4 kg bags. The last requirement is to provide
an exhaust air volume of approximately 34 m3/min to keep the
system at a negative pressure relative to the surrounding atmosphere.
This prevents dust generated within the B&BCD from flowing out of the
unit and contaminating the work environment.
The final recommended design of the B&BCD cost
between $9,000 and $10,000 to fabricate. Approximately one-third of
this cost was attributed to the chain conveyor portion. The other
two-thirds would be additional cost for the various techniques to clean
the bags and belt and to contain the dust and material removed within the
device. The 34 m3/min of exhaust air volume to a baghouse
is not included in this cost. It is also estimated that fabrication
time was approximately 120 employee-hours.
1Mining engineer.
2Physical scientist.
3Mechanical engineer technician
Pittsburgh Research Center, U.S. Bureau of Mines, Pittsburgh, PA.
4Watts, W. F., Jr., and D. R. Parker. Quartz exposure Trends
in Metal and Nonmetal Mining. International Report. U.S. Bureau of Mines. Twin
Cities Research Center.
5Italic numbers in parentheses refer to items in the list of
references preceding the figures.
|